Disclaimer: I usually charge for this type of information.
Elliot waves and Don Kruger equilibria theory dictate for every sharp decline in the stochastic variable, there will be a sharp over turn equal in magnitude at minimum (theta = 1.33, phi = 1.73).
Clearly we are heading to $100,000 per BTC based on this theory. See image for proof.
Other urls found in this thread:
gr8b8m8 8/8
>I usually charge for this type of information.
>Post it for free in some anime fart fetish board
>Charting on CMC
>Charging money for this shit
that is the iluminator triangle. nice find op. i can sleep now.
Deahtly hollows formation
You need to read don Kruger’s theory on stochastic variables, deterministic probabilistic models on uncertainty on supply and demand. Please come back once you do so we can have a real conversation.
I love harry potter too!
what purpose does drawing a circle serve?
Major brainlet alert. Minimum 110 IQ to post in this thread.
Can you eli5 so I don't have to turn my brain on
This was obvious to me but then again I am Exceptional.
In stochastic approximation, the cost function cannot be computed explicitly as the distribution is assumed to be unknown. Instead, one has access to a sequence of independent observations, which we collect in and around the sample data of interest region of a random variable, and draw a unit circle of magnitude 1.33*root(3).
In essence, it essentially provides the trader with local minimum and maximum trajectories for momentum based movement, it is very useful in markets based on essentially 100%, such as Bitcoin.
100% sentiment**
True but BTC needs to hit $2500 first. Timing might take another year, but for those that hold on, the rewards should be nice. Or something, I don't know.
If you have to ask... never gonna make it.
the circle looks like it's in an arbitrary location. Why isn't the pinnacle of the triangle the peak BTC price?
Local minimum and maximum values are nice to know, however, this theory used key support and resistances in between to asses momentum, buying / selling pressure, and overall flow and movement of volume.
we're reaching levels of cope here that shouldn't even be possible.
Can you show a real-life example of this happening? Sounds interesting but I'm too brainlet to add anything to discussion
See
this is accurate, but the reason this is accurate is wrong. the past is not an indicator of future performance.
if i had to guess i'd say bitcion prices hit 600 usd again
>Guess.
in english doc...
That light green id tho...
You keep erasing your tripcode to shitpost in other threads huh?
Anyways no clue about anything you're saying. Have no $ and genuinely wish you luck.
>Don Kruger
Will xmr follow?
It’s happening
thank sir, I like this
>buy and sell instruments with my friend
>oh look it made a teacup it has to go up noe
>oh wow it his "resistance" it cant go higher
You TA fags should kys. Im pissing myself
"100k by end of 2018" kek
100k by 2020...1k by eom
this is what Is more likely IMO
timeframe?
Based on the input parameters, its looking like mid-2019 for a reversal of 61.8% fibonacci from the bottom.
your stupid and possibly a latent homosexual. sticks took a hit pretty much across the board AND crypto was hit
where did the money go ? you dont keep money as currency you invest . lets talk volume. do you even know how much wealth vanished from all the major sources? look at the markets
no crypto will be worth having mid next year. stop playing dickbutt for 5 seconds and think hard about your next move
FYI a dumb boastful claim is the literal opposite of a disclaimer.
Prime numbers are the key Sir.
What do you think BTC will be EOY?
Unironically correct.
What went wrong here, why'd it dump? I know you meant it would pump
>deterministic probabilistic models on uncertainty on supply and demand
Yeah, and nobody is 'demanding' your monopoly money anymore, guy. But please, draw some more triangles and lines and continue to look retarded.
Thnks Mr. Kroger this will help me
Seems like you don't get it
FYI, your all brainlets, this was a LARP.
Last thread with same "TA" got 200+ posts
Faggot, three days ago you implied it would pump soon
xrp 60 trillion eoy
What would this indicate, Doc?
You're* :^)
You gotta be a fucking idiot to believe it’s going to go from 5k to 100k in a month when ATH was shy of 20k and it took years to get there
How much longer do I have until 100k you think? I don’t TA but I think 100k is spot on correct based off the stock to flow ratio.
Question for you user.
Where would all of that money actually come from?
It's a simple question, one you should definitely be able to answer.
That would imply that demand for BTC is increasing. It's not, there's no guarantee on demand for BTC because it's not a resource, it's not something people need or want, so there's no demand.
To explain it to brainlets, the circle is not arbitrary.
It's based on isolating market movements and essentially charting from a fixed location.
This is grossly oversimplified, but imagine making waves in a bath tub by dropping a rock.
You wouldn't just circle your favorite waves if you wanted to know what it would look like if you repeated the process. You'd circle where you dropped the rock.
What is an OTC purchase, and who are institutional investors?
OTC markets for BTC are growing at an insane pace. This alone has gotten my attention in the last 3 months.
Got 'em!
>deterministic
>probabilistic
You can only pick one for your model you literal drooling retard
see my ta now, faggot
faggot