>You thinking you can stop us is the real idiocy. I would rather support a project led by a well funded team of core developers, sustaining and developing the original, i.e. source code version of Bitcoin, than believing anything that complete maniacs, idiots and frauds in the likes of Roger Ver or Craig Wright say or do.
> not understanding simple mathematics I study comp. sci. and I am personally interested in cryptography and economics. I tend to believe that I know at the very least as much as you do about this subject.
Connor Ortiz
> I would rather support a project led by a well funded team of core developers incompetents. And funded for what? You might want to ask yourself what the goal they're aiming for is, because it absolutely sure as fuck is not supply tamper proof uncensorable peer to peer electronic cash. And given that, you had better be sure you understand where what they *are* aiming at will end up. > than believing anything that complete maniacs, idiots and frauds in the likes of Roger Ver or Craig Wright say or do. Believe's got nothing to do with it. They're either wrong or they're right. And Ver at least is right when he correct identifies BTC as sabotaged. Wright is indeed a useless fraudulent psychopath conman. > I tend to believe that I know at the very least as much as you do about this subject. Since you can't see the economic ends of the two paths in question, clearly that's wrong.
