Why are we pumping?

Fuck off with your scam coin. Can't wait to see it crash and burn, fucking pajeets.

>he didn't follow the DSV controversy
CSW doesn't want oracle capacity in the base protocol. He says this makes miners complicit is handling illegal data and changes bitcoin's legal status as a currency.

This means that oracles will need to be run by third parties that assume risk to engage in the data selling market. Chainlink is the leading solution to this market.

Chainlink will announce in January that they are moving their contracts to the BSV chain and focus on providing data to the emerging nation-state BSV smartcontracts.

Imagine not being all in BSV and LINK. How could you cope?

>Chainlink will announce in January that they are moving their contracts to the BSV chain and focus on providing data to the emerging nation-state BSV smartcontracts.

Proof? Big if true

Heil Victory!
Heil Sergey!

Time to buy

>muh useless 0 utility 0 privacy PoW shitcoin

Just die Craig. Just die. You've made the entire space even more of a joke than it already was.

fuck you kraut

But Link is blockchain agnostic

Yessss ... YESSSSS
god merciful, let this be true

Attached: 1542648125064.jpg (240x210, 6K)

No, that was me releasing my sell walls after making a 4% profit trading.
I’d give you guys a heads up but Jow Forums has been shit to me lately

Attached: 42EA1248-5215-4A84-9CFD-2C04E3B3D93A.jpg (750x895, 214K)

Proof?
We're talking about LINK and CSW. There has never been any proof. Just really good stories.

The SV side spoke of reliable, competing oracles multiple times at random talks. They are definitely aware.
The problem is that it is very probable that they will build something superior themselves.

Imagine being this much of a retard

Chainlink doesn't need to rewrite contracts, all you'll need is a BCH SV adaptor and you can start using decentralized oracle's, could probably put it together in a day

maybe. But they seemed fully focused on scaling. Not only is that getting node software and network infrastructure up to par but also making sure the base protocol is lightweight and secure enough to create usable smartcontracts that are also small enough to be economic.

Seems to me like their plates are full. Why not offload oracles to a protocol who already is optimizing themselves for institutions and integrating with legal precedents?

To me it seems like BSV and LINK have the same philosophy and direction. A perfect match. ETH is too weird and niche. They are too development focused which end up with useless, trivial code. BSV and LINK want rough, proven code and will sacrifice nothing for massive usability.

Just the life cycle of a link NPC

Attached: link.png (772x522, 68K)

god cant wait for this retard coin for die so never have see that fat faggot face again

Attached: 1542437969535.jpg (1230x1034, 89K)

Fuuuuuuuck why is this scam pumping, I sold at 7k sats

lol of course you can use LINK for BSV...
but the LINK contracts still run and settle on something that is one cryptokitty away from being useless. Do you not know how blockchains work?

Craig isn't going to see New Years Eve. Checkem.

Rerolling for dead CSW.

>You're following accordingly
Reminder that Chainlink pumped totally against the grain for five months straight.
Please try to be less retarded, but you won't.

is this wagies buying with their end of month salary

stop impersonating me

Attached: 1542654986307.jpg (1024x578, 26K)

wrong. consensys jew festival tomorrow. big magic for the nose tribe.

the year is 2020 and 0.01% of the forex market is handled in chainlink smart contracts resulting in 530 mil a day

Attached: Ds9sa7GXgAEtrs_.jpg (654x129, 22K)

da year'd be 2021 and .1% am so it beecum 5.3 billion :D

Ergo Proxy was a shit anime

aaand then net year it be 53 billion YEAR AFTER 530 BULIPN ABDEBADTER DAD IT B 5.3 TRILLION AHHH

AGHHHHH

AHHHHHHHHH