Deep thinking

BCHSV just might be for real. Attention has always fueled project longevity. Positive or negative is irrelevant. BCHSV is getting a lot of attention recently. Ergo I bought some WrightVision coins.

Your thoughts?

Attached: William_Neptune,_Passamaquoddy_chief,_1920.jpg (300x400, 31K)

I am autistic and I am all in unironically

We're right at home on this board aren't we?

Attached: 1460924377201.png (720x644, 31K)

High risk high reward

I'm highly autistic and I'm all in on SV

What will it take for you people to understand that it doesn't fucking work? It's failed empirically already, no intent to actually fix it. BSV is literally just the BCH faction that believes the long term vision can be accomplished with unicorn farts and rainbows, and anyone who is actually trying to get the software to deliver on the possibilities of the hardware is a saboteur.
It blows my mind that people are still honestly falling for this shit. Wake the fuck up. You are proving the coretards actually correct finally about one thing when it comes to people calling them on their bullshit purely by the stupidity with which you pursue your otherwise reasonable goals.
And I'm not fucking responding again and getting dragged into a bullshit negative gamma CTOR is a socialist node subsidy dsv rapes babies cringefest. Just fucking stop already fuuuuck.

Attached: fZJeIG6_d.jpg (640x350, 29K)

hold your coins to 1000 at least

I'm pro-sv, but I'm not sure what attention you're referring to besides this board./

Don't bother user, seriously. It's a waste of time to explain this stuff to the average Jow Forumstard. They are not interested in understanding the technology they invested their life savings into. They want feel-good reminders, HODL memes, twitter posts, etc etc. 95% of them don't understand things like Blocksize limits, Fee markets, Block Propagation, Nakamoto consensus, soft versus hard forks, opcodes, and so on.

Some honestly still believe bitcoin can moon back to 20k (It can't), and most of them are easily misled by propaganda spouted by dip shits like Craig Wright.

Attached: faggotsmakemsick.jpg (2448x3264, 1.54M)

Mostly the hate they get from Jow Forumsbtc and Jow Forumscc
Mainly because of CW's association with the project. To me BTC, BCH, and BSV are equally centralized. So what difference does it make which one I invest in.

These are the differences.
BTC; DON'T TRUST, VERIFY. (imagine everyone in the fucking world had to go over every transaction personally to validate it themselves. It flat out doesn't scale and alternative paths to achieving scale are bald faced lies, but cultists will attack you relentlessly for saying so. )

BCH; TRUST, BUT VERIFY (miners assumed to be operating in the interests of the ecosystem but all other parts of that ecosystem should be able to participate in validation if they get economic benefit out of it. They will not be subsidized at the expense of the chain)

BSV; JUST TRUST (miner dictatorship centralised all to fuck and back nobody except miners is expected to be able to validate hundred million plus outlay on that game and any optimizations to make the chain function better for the entire ecosystem on a cost benefit analysis level is referred to as onions boy beta cuck socialism subsidy nodes mah suck balls tourettes syndrome outburst from alcoholic conman front man, the rules are completely set by the aforementioned centralised miner so why even bother verifying even if you did want to spend the money to be able to?theres literally no such thing as a defecting miner because if the miner is doing it that's the rules.)

Duh.

Nobody outside of hardcore crypto users give a fuck about Bitcoin forks.

One mainstream news post and it's done

Honestly I'm surprised CSW is still alive at this point. Hes gonna get his ass whooped if he keeps opening his mouth

But tbqh you'd have to be a complete retard to think this is going anywhere but down. Pretty much every coin but BTC, ETH and XLM is dogshit. Most forks, and especially forks of forks have diminishing returns.

SV will be lumped with Bitcoin diamond and other shitcoins

Attached: raf,360x360,075,t,fafafa_ca443f4786.jpg (360x360, 25K)

BTC=Bastardized segwit coin with purposefully crippled transaction capacity so that layer 2 "solution" (lightning network) based on trusted nodes can be implemented. All development controlled by the private entity Blockstream.

BCH=Forked BTC with plans to create a new layer 2 ecosystem (wormhole) that requires permanent and irreversible burning of BCH to enter. This will reduce the use case market drive for the base coin as more and more and more people get stuck in the wormhole from which there is no way out. Wormhole is owned by Bitmain, a private entity.

BSV=A fork of BCH without any plans for alternate platforms like LN and wormhole but completely owned and developed by a private entity nChain.

Mining wise all three are equally centralized as evidence by the recent BCH fork where nChain controls all BSV mining and Roger Ver overrode his own customers' selection to dedicate all hash power under Bitcoin.com for the fork. 2 of 3 Chinese mining cartels control the vast majority of hash power of both BCH and BTC. The mining diversity is not really an argument at all.

> muh centralised lightning nodes
> pay no attention to muh centralised sv nodes.
Bait. If you can't look up a mining pie chart comparing sv. To bch I don't have time to waste on you. You're right about BTC but for the exact reason you are it also invalidates BSV. Only. BCH actually works and is simply proceeding along the correct path, no muss no fuss. Wormhole is a meme. Look up wormhole sv.

>my meme coin is less centralized than that other meme coin so don't buy the ones I don't like
No it isn't. None of the three choices are better than the other. That is my argument. Therefore any one of them is an equally valid investment when deciding based on this single factor. To me BSV has the most room to grow since it's new and its development team seems motivated and competent (centralization notwithstanding) so that's what I bought in.

Nothing is valued based on fundamentals. Ironically eth is the closest because of slant of utility, which is why it's undervalued relative to everything else that's valued based on bullshit.

The more absurd the promise, the harder it is to disprove. Bitcoin with its 'store of value' meme is the most absurd of all. Literally an euphemism for a ponzi scheme - buy only to profit on a buyer in the future - but people buy it.

That's nice. Restating your case without acknowledging the simple facts proving it wrong isn't convincing anybody.

Which is why this market needs to get fucking rekt. To get rid of all these clueless meme buying when lambo moonbois.

The best two forms of Bitcoin are BTC and 0xBTC. BCH and BCHSV are the two nutjob forks that serve no purpose. The original chain will reign on and 0xBTC serves a purpose for Ethereum as the true store of value and currency for the network when ETH gets staked in the future. LTC and DOGE are great. Most utility tokens are pump and dump scams, but a large percentage still is useful.

You did the right thing. Just look at the volum of the two coins. SV has more than 3 times the volume. BAB is dead. It's the snow that fell last year

bought most of my stack at 0.023 sats lol getting /comfy/ for this run

Attached: 1541729817535s.jpg (249x250, 10K)

USDT gains would be preferable since BTC is slumping recently.