Early adopters

Nolan Morgan
Nolan Morgan

mass adoption soon

Attached: linkscheme.png (221 KB, 1136x775)

Other urls found in this thread:

jowforums.com/thread/12032563/business
youtube.com/watch?v=vAUHmram7RU&feature=youtu.be&t=346
coindesk.com/ibm-blockchain-maersk-shipping-struggling/

Jaxson Roberts
Jaxson Roberts

baste and bizpild

Leo Evans
Leo Evans

Reeee

Jack Wilson
Jack Wilson

btupid

Gabriel Adams
Gabriel Adams

jowforums.com/thread/12032563/business

Asher Thomas
Asher Thomas

Mass adoption rejected.

Evan Smith
Evan Smith

Attached: ATL.png (427 KB, 1064x876)

Mason Gray
Mason Gray

do ICO
ask for 32 million dollars in ETH (during bull run) for 35% of the supply
that ETH moons and reaches 100 million dollars
keep 35% of the supply for self (literally the same amount of the entire fucking circulating supply)
lets permissioned (private) tokenless blockchains basically use their network for free
you're tokens are now basically worthless
thanks for the 100 million dollars, no refunds

ABSOLUTELY BIG MAC'D

Jose Hernandez
Jose Hernandez

t. discord pajeet

Noah Johnson
Noah Johnson

oracles fixed the butthole problem

Alexander Perry
Alexander Perry

use their network for free
lol no

Individual oracles sure. There was always the possibility to use those for free, but not the Chainlink mainnet.

Alexander King
Alexander King

which is literally all they need to not have to use the public network. they need only 1 node that they know and trust. the traditional data providers will run that node, so they will take responsibility the same way they would if they gave wrong data in any off chain agreement.

chainlink should let them test for a limited time in private blockchains and then stop letting them use it to force them to move to public blockchains. but they wont do it because they literally dont give a fuck about the token. sergey is already a multi millionaire, the shit token was just an excuse for people to give him 32 million dollars so he could develop the tech. (the acquisition of town crier and shit. it was made with YOUR money)

Robert Brooks
Robert Brooks

which is literally all they need to not have to use the public network
they need only 1 node that they know and trust.
Not exactly.

Pic related for instance takes a lot more than one node.

Attached: chainlink-PoC-slide.png (224 KB, 728x538)

Jason Mitchell
Jason Mitchell

pills hard to swallow: this

Ryan Gray
Ryan Gray

this has to be bait right?
when i said 1 node i meant 1 node for each data they want to fetch.
since the people running the node are trustworthy, you no longer need 1000 people fetching for a single type of data and then aggregate the result to give out 1 input. you only need 1. there will be 1 oracle for reach input that the contract requires and those oracles will be ran by the data providers themselves

Jose Thompson
Jose Thompson

the acquisition of town crier and shit. it was made with YOUR money
Do you have a problem with investments that help corner the market or something?
Imagine being this dumb.

Hunter Walker
Hunter Walker

when i said 1 node i meant 1 node for each data they want to fetch.
So whose nodes are in that pic?

Grayson Sanders
Grayson Sanders

yes, i have a problem when the value of the thing that i bought does not correlate with the value of the fucking project.
any linktard here can no longer say "they will use ripple, not XRP" because sergey is doing the exact same shit to us. THEY WILL USE THE TECH. THE TECH WILL HAVE SUCCESS. IT WILL NOT, HOWEVER, CORRELATE IN ANY SHAPE OR FORM TO THE FUCKING SHIT TOKEN THAT THEY SOLD US, SPECIALLY WHEN THEY USE THE TECH AS A WHITE LABEL. NO ONE WILL EVER EVEN FUCKING KNOW ITS FUCKING CALLED CHAINLINK

David Cruz
David Cruz

hurrrr you only need 1 node
Here's ETH's Joseph Poon talking about how a large portion of cryptos require something called peer-to-peer oracles.

youtube.com/watch?v=vAUHmram7RU&feature=youtu.be&t=346

Go wash your wiping hand.

Austin Ramirez
Austin Ramirez

Not for private chains.
But private chain users still offer massive marketing/exposure.
Plus private chains are ultimately doomed anyway: coindesk.com/ibm-blockchain-maersk-shipping-struggling/
Turns out they don't trust each other lol.

Plus plus, peer-to-peer smart contracts ultimately displace the very parties that insist on using these private chains (banks etc.)

The real potential is in the peer-to-peer oracles. And they cannot exist without guaranteed and immediate guarantees and compensation.

And the idea that the data providers will run the nodes is simply hilarious. What are they gonna do, send data to literally everyone constantly and all the time in case they need it? Look up the very basics about what oracles are, at least.

Henry Sullivan
Henry Sullivan

The LINK Token
sale involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may
cause the actual functionality, utility, or levels of use of LINK Tokens to be materially
different from any projected future results, use, functionality or utility expressed or
implied by SCCL in the terms.

Henry Cox
Henry Cox

Oh man, is it September 2017 again already?

Dominic Hill
Dominic Hill

jesus christ get a load this schizo-discord faggot,
permissioned chains still need permission less data I am actually getting sick of explaining this

Jayden Brooks
Jayden Brooks

Not for private chains.
Not 'always' for private chains.

Regular mainnet Chainlink nodes can and will still provide data to private chains with zero problem.