>the greatest empires well ruled by dictators/totalitarian states
>julius ceasar and all previous Roman emperors >Genghis Khan >Alexander the Great >Persian empire fags >Qing Dynasty
Why havent you taken the feudilism pill yet user? capitalism is inherently flawed. pic related. this is what happens when you let the democracy (average IQ) choose what happens with the country instead of a single leader with 150 IQ.
There's no longer a reliable way to select a good dictator. Usually the best examples emerged out of military or civil conflicts where their leadership skills and judgement allowed them to rise to power. Modern military and states are too complex for it to happen now. Democratic governments are also rotting, patriotism and nationalism use to keep them in check to some degree, modern politicians have little interest in their states and they're wealthy enough to move elsewhere if things get too bad.
Adrian Stewart
>Qing dynasty >good lmao
Isaac Fisher
preceding brainlet
Aiden Cooper
This is a business and finance board sir Merchant republics only >muh big empires Yeah and how long did they last? >Republic of Venice >Founded: 697 AD >Dissolved: 1797AD The true 1000 year Reich
the jews killed them all with bombs and goy cannon fodder and then installed (((liberal democracy))).
Benjamin Foster
>be dictator >enslave literally everyone yeah, no shit you'll have a great empire but at what price
Jaxon Reyes
>He thinks he's free under democracy
David Edwards
Who is gaddafi
Caleb Sullivan
>Why havent you taken the feudilism pill yet user? Because I come from a peasant family, so I'll be royally fucked anyway. Also desu feudalism never went away, it is in fact, an old form of capitalism. It just got some nicer colors and better looking clothes than it did in the dark ages.
Samuel Moore
Your pic related runs directly counter to your love of giant empires, dumbass.
Ryder Howard
Ignoring the capitalism is inherently flawed statement which is a separate issue. Dictatorships and Monarchies are preferable to democracies because of their time preference.
Two scenarios: >Given a house to own indefinitely >Rent paid in a house for 4 years
Which would be better looked after after a period of time?
Benjamin Thomas
>Rent paid in a house for 4 years Probably better stated as, given a house to live in for four years only.
Nolan Sanders
And they all fucking failed. Congrats you’re an asshat
Mason Wilson
People don't think about this the right way in light of our modern predicament. Monarchy isn't about having a great king, it's about NOT being ruled by corporations, media, and left-wing activists in academia. The actual democratic process is a scam, the King could just do "responsive authoritarianism" if he wanted to.