Attached: 1544959346939.jpg (1272x1030, 229K)
Another day, another partnership
Jayden Sanders
Other urls found in this thread:
bitcoinmagazine.com
twitter.com
Aiden Fisher
Literally who?
Tyler Jones
Whoerally lit?
Robert Peterson
Bill Gates himself could post a picture of himself wearing a plaid shirt and a Sergey plushie lodged up his ass and the price would probably still dump.
Jace Robinson
My hair turns grey.. every day..
When mainnet ?
Dominic Perry
lmao, bantz delivered sir
Nolan Sanchez
Checked.
>as of this morning
based
Evan Morris
>bitcoinmagazine.com
>A common narrative in today’s financial world is that crypto holders are often unable to execute trades without paying large amounts of commissions and fees. Traditional markets are loaded with retail brokerages that bet against their clients with artificially adjusted prices, spreads and unrealistic fees.
>Enter Quantfury, an emerging enterprise that’s on an ambitious quest to reshape this landscape for everyday cryptocurrency holders and others who enjoy trading the markets. Founded in April 2017 with offices in Toronto and Singapore, Quantfury offers a state-of-the-art trading app for both iOS and Android that allows traders to utilize their cryptocurrency holdings to trade equities, cryptocurrencies, fiat pairs and commodities, in fiat amounts.
Lincoln Powell
Bob Summerwill is the lead dev. You don't know who he is because you don't know anything about crypto.
Carson Sanchez
this is unironically huge. Quantfury is a 100x ICO
Daniel Price
Incorrect
Jack Roberts
Now stop being retarded
Jose Brooks
Did you even read that, lil brainlet?
Camden Cruz
Yes he said they are looking at chainlink, that they have done no testing with chainlink and that they don't need chainlink to run their platform as it exists today
Samuel White
Exactly.
So what exactly is "incorrect"?
Or are you the type of absolute trenchbrain that thinks a partnership means the two parties cannot exist without one another and there are zero alternatives outside of doing the partnership?
Because that would be retarded. Can you imagine being his retarded? Haha, that would be weird.
Eli Bennett
A company "looking" at chainlink is not a partnership
Matthew Fisher
Another day, another who
Landon Evans
What about a company working with, talking with and using Chainlink?
All his words btw.
Grayson Bennett
Except they aren't working with chainlink. They "will talk to" chainlink. Meaning they haven't even talked yet. There is no business happening between them. There so no partnership at this point
Blake Sanchez
>are you guys working with them?
>yes we do, as of this morning
Whoops, sorry about that little fud sandcastle you spent all this time building.
Jack Lee
So you just didn't read the images I posted? The images that show Lev clarifying that very comment? Saying that is was re-tweeted and misinterpreted? Saying that they haven't even spoken to chainlink?
Logan Reyes
Please point me to the part where he said they aren't working with Chainlink after all.
>Saying that is was re-tweeted and misinterpreted?
Learn to read, it was misinterpreted as "quantfury streams ALL the data and validates it with chainlink".
>Saying that they haven't even spoken to chainlink?
Just because he says they will talk to Chainlink, doesn't mean they haven't already.