Is 1000 Nano enough to make it?

Is 1000 Nano enough to make it?

Attached: Nano-Logo.jpg (768x476, 16K)

Other urls found in this thread:

nanocrawler.cc/explorer/accounts/1
twitter.com/AnonBabble

By my calculations, yes.
Nano will pump to $300 with no reason whatsoever.

This. Have 2k instead though, so you have a good chunk to take profits from along the way

checked
Yes, that should be enough

whats a good suicide stack?

1

buying a dead alt like nano isn't going to get you anywhere. it already had its pump, now it dumped, and by the time the next bull run rolls along, its going to be old news and forgotten, like peercoin

Take a look at this nano rich list:

nanocrawler.cc/explorer/accounts/1

Out of 300k accounts only 8k have above 1k nano. That would put you in 95th percentile roughly, since we don't have exact figures. Anything above 1k nano, and you start getting into accounts with tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of nano. So yes, I would say that makes you rather nano rich. If nano ever realizes its true value you'd be pretty well off.

If it ever goes above a few hundred dollars I'd probably come up with a story about how you lost your wallet seed or something. Or at least not post about it here.

What is your calculation?

I would but I don't have more money to invest without selling my ass.

>whats a good suicide stack?
A large amount of IOTA.

>If it ever goes above a few hundred dollars I'd probably come up with a story about how you lost your wallet seed or something. Or at least not post about it here.
Good idea fren. I hope by then there are countries that just let you cash out without problems. Is Portugal still good?

Attached: w3r75dh1kadz.jpg (1431x880, 119K)

>a dead alt
this is how i know you're trolling or retarded

interesting, I should deff accumulate until 1k

the hype is gone, and thats all nano ever had. its tech isn't unique or the first of its kind, and payment/feature coins like it are a dime a dozen, all with no real users

Wait is Nano back?

Attached: Xrb.png (497x412, 472K)

more like 51% of the supply

Sell it at $1, wait for BTC to capitulate to 1.2k which will dump NANO to around 5-10 cents, reload your bags with 10,000 instead of 1000 NANO, then sell it all at $50 during the next bullrun. Enjoy early retirement.

I only managed to trade my way to just over 200 nano. I bought it at the rock bottom and holding. I'm a little worried that after I sell that miniscule stack I won't be able to buy back. This is one coin that I did very well with but since the bottom it keeps going up. I am a porrfag duh...so I treat every satoshi like it's $100. I was thinking to wait and sell some other coins for ETH and BTC like I was doing then if it dumps just simply buy more, or am I a brainlet for thinking that?

>the tech isn't unique

Lol, it's literally the first of its kind, using a block lattice. Not to mention instantaneous, feeless, and eco-friendly. That's something literally no other cryptoccurencu can do. Go run back to your shit coin, nano is going to be one of the few coins that makes it.

wtf i clicked this link and something popped up and all my LINK disappeared???

Fibonacci retraction
Ichimoko cloud
Log graphs
Hope they are right.

I only have 500, been holding them since 2016, what am I in for? this has been my long for a while

Attached: 1530146791073.jpg (500x375, 128K)

>holding them since 2016
holy retardation.. imagine not selling at $36 and rebuying at $0.75 and increasing your stack 50x

I did a comparison of distributions a while back and found the best distributions. Bitcoin #1, Nano #2, Ethereum #3. Not counting exchange wallets.

But the problem is BTC and ETH have a huge population of investors and users. Nano has no fucking body. Until next FOMO cycle kicks in draws new normies without the memory of this dump, I am not putting money in Nano. I did make ~$100K off it.

Attached: nanohot.jpg (1221x814, 128K)

how much nano for $1million tho?

It is something I regret, but it was just a long I invested in because I believe in the tech.

Nano is going to at least $100 in the next few months. Maybe even $1000 if BTC hits 50k. So yeah 1000 Nano should be enough.

nice.

so accumulate BTC ETH and NANO.

Your forgetting link

what the goddamn hell are you even saying, we are back to 3K and maybe getting back to 10K by summer if we are lucky.

Attached: 3f3.jpg (300x168, 11K)

all of this. we're all going to make it
NANO top 5 before April

Attached: CB2FB800-361E-4DDB-A3E8-5E56603C7984.jpg (275x183, 19K)

Once the devs finish fine tuning nano, and they start pushing the market front nano will take over top 5 easily. Every other coin out their is some barely function mess, if they even have an actual functioning coin at all. It'll be like clubbing baby seals.

Trips of truth. My man

KEK is with us. NANO ftw

I hope so. I only have around 1k Nano too.

Attached: nano-sayaka-1.jpg (1404x790, 109K)

Easiest money I've ever made was buying nano. It truly is incredible

its one of my bets that might just make it bro. the currency alternative to proven very secure POW.
if it works out its gonna be great.

Hope so, if it could get to $100 I'd be happy.

Other long I'm in is OPQ and SHL

The staged and planned boomer conversation in these nano threads are so pathetic and non-organic. Did you have a new meeting on nanotrade discord again? Are you really so worried about your real 756 TPS numbers, and not the 7000 that you are constantly lying about and your incometent/sociopathic devs of a total shitcoin discovered and pushed by Italian scammers?

>40 billion USD market cap

Don't be that delusional.

Anyone investing in shitcoin nano will not make it, pic related. Sorry boomers.

Attached: 3454534.jpg (960x2117, 716K)

This is what mental disease looks like Jow Forums.

pls don't post it
pls don't post it
pls don't post it

Attached: nanofudloser2.png (416x435, 96K)

Great "argument" there, boomer fuck. Get the hell back to plebbit, sucker. You have to go back.

Attached: Baby-boomers.jpg (612x788, 95K)

its him, nanofudder has arrived.

Attached: nanofudloser3.png (416x435, 96K)

I've never seen such a hellbent group of fudders. You must be scared of new age DAG coins coming to suck up your low-tech low-intelligence coin's market cap. It'll be okay pea brain.

>What is IOTA for $500 Alex.

You mean what is IOTA for 10 cents.

All the claims you made about nano, IOTA does. Better.
With more realworld partnerships including global corporations, OH AND THE FUCKING UN.
If you made money off Raiblocks, good for you.
You saw that it was a scam and you got out on top.
The rest of you still clinging on to hope that it'll rise in price irrelevant of btc, are actually fucking retarded.

>All the claims you made about nano, IOTA does. Better.
IOTA doesn't work. You can keep the UN.

Please explain how it doesn't work.
I've sent multiple transactions over the past year and a half, including 4 last week, to and from binance.
Worked every time.

How doesn't it work again?

Attached: npc.png (667x670, 289K)

>Please explain how it doesn't work.
It's boring to do this again.

Call me when the central coordinator is gone.

It's boring that you don't have an answer and repeat shitty old FUD.

Please explain how it doesn't work.
I'll wait.

What part of central coordinator do you not get exactly? Waiting for your reply.

Oh I fully understand that they have a training wheel on it until the network can sustain itself fully.
Bitcoin did the exact same thing.

What I'm asking you, VERY SIMPLY, is to explain how IOTA doesn't work.
This is your claim.
Explain it.

>Bitcoin did the exact same thing.
Lmao what

why does no one bring up the fact that the only thing NANO does well (transact quickly for free) is absolutely pointless when you consider the fact that NO ONE SPENDS THEIR FUCKING CRYPTO???

We have reached FUD levels previously unseen.

You know you're doing something right when people are coming after you this hard. If nano was a shitcoin no one would care enough to attack it.

How does Nano generate any value if no coins are burned by transactions and the supply always stays the same?

How does burning coins generate value? Are you retarded?

less supply => higher value

You are retarded.

k

not a NANO holder
but $40b for a currency isnt unreasonable

in the short term BTC or LTC can't scale to serve tens/huns of millions of people

so NANO could possibly gain a foothold in countries where even 1c is a large fee

Pssssst...user, a generic universal crypto "currency" will never be accepted as a fiat replacement, it will be regulated to shit well before then.

The only use of blockchain is smart contracts and as a settlement layer for fast movement of government regulated currencies.

>The only use of blockchain is smart contracts and as a settlement layer for fast movement of government regulated currencies.

Attached: 03A7AF20-36C8-4435-AE8C-522383035395.png (645x729, 77K)

10 years of bitcoin....look at all dat usage, weeeew

>but, but, its different this time, cos I'm invested in NANO

Attached: 1545215646285.jpg (474x432, 33K)

Vs 0 years of smartcontracts being used you dumb brat

What is a dex moron. What are most tokens distributions

Jesus, im here with a bunch of brainlets

Well the issue I see is, you're some fucking tard who thinks trading and distributing tokens is a use case

That's why I'm invested in the most functional currency and you'll lose everything on your erc20 shit tokens.

Wait until the Mafia have unloading and maybe then you have a chance.

Hahahaha, didn't even know what smart contracts are, hahahahahahaha

you absolutely deserve NANO, its perfect for you

Attached: 1542246662681.png (671x519, 146K)

Been stocking up on Nano for the last year straight. I will be nearing 50,000 soon. Am I a whale yet? I don't really plan on selling btw. Rather am building to help create a world where cashing out won't be needed.

Attached: 1522684065118.jpg (1140x620, 79K)

upboated

Attached: 1538312105733.png (594x582, 41K)

You're a brainlet for overdiversifying with limited funds.

Used the past few weeks to get entries into nano and xmr. dapps and platforms are a meme.

Maybe with a time machine