Why is the lizard race so eager to stop BTC when it clearly is going to lose anyway to a new economy of stablecoins and...

Why is the lizard race so eager to stop BTC when it clearly is going to lose anyway to a new economy of stablecoins and other smart contract money?

Attached: t41ui1txumv11.png (914x866, 1.13M)

Other urls found in this thread:

lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Lose? Implying they wouldn't make their own stablecoin if the sec let's it slide.

You misunderstood. The lizards don't won't fixed supply decentralized functioning coins so they took over BTC, but stablecoins are just... stable - unless someone finds a way to magically scale Ether X100000.

Is the illuminati eye intentional?

When BTC goes to zero, you think they won't win all the way down? People like that don't care about having their legacy cemented by technological achievement. They literally want to live forever and need money to do so.

Attached: 1534558690984-biz.jpg (599x718, 53K)

It's a joke. Anyone who unironically believes the conspiracy theories of Blockstream probably believes the earth is flat too.

Attached: goback.jpg (800x820, 124K)

>It's a joke.
Prove it
>Anyone who unironically believes the conspiracy theories of Blockstream
Strawman, there are valid complaints about their confirmed behaviors
>probably believes the earth is flat too
Don't change the subject

Attached: 1544844149195-biz.jpg (480x358, 20K)

An easy Google search proves that less than 25% of the devs working on Core are from Blockstream, which means the infographic painting Core devs as controlled by Blockstream fallacious. On top of that, there are like 300 devs from around the world working on this project, and a lot of them aren't even paid. They are all rich already from investing in BTC early, so why would they need to be bribed from some company? Just because a company's chairman is part of the Bilderburg group invested in the project, doesn't mean they control it. In reality, the devs, nor the miners have control of the system, it is the nodes who decide. Less than 30% of the BTC community agreed with increasing blocks, and to hard fork is against what decentralized immutable blockchain stands for. 30% is far from the majority, and to try to break up a community for your own profit is just downright wrong.

Attached: 1544147787989.jpg (740x720, 158K)

You'd think if lizardrace really controlled bitcoin, they would be promoting it with mainstream media.
Nearly everyone from MSM, to shitcoin traders are jealous they didn't get in bitcoin early, so they're trying to replace it so they can finally feel like they didn't miss out.
Bitcoin is here to stay, and will replace the juden boomers, and the sub 80 iq shitcoin traders.
Hope you didn't miss out.

lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-August/010238.html

Attached: 1510711365993.png (567x567, 202K)