What does Jow Forums think about anarcho capitalism?

Rothbard has some good criticisms of the banking system but their worldview is based on a fundamentally incorrect view of human nature that has it's origins in abstract thought experiments rather than reality . Anarchism is the logical conclusion of the conception of humanity as atomised rights bearing individuals so they are at least consistent unlike most other strains of the liberal tradition . The problem is their axiom is wrong , and has no basis in reality which is why anarchism never works in practice .

It's oxymoronic. Anarchy is the rejection of systems, rules and order. Capitalism is a system which requires rules and order. You cant implement a capitalist economy without a shittonne of laws to govern it. Its a meme and not even a good one.

Based and redpilled. Fuck everyone else.

Women never had a say before and they won't have say with this.
A state will always grow. How you think socialism can create something that won't burn in fiery ashes is beyond me.
Anarchy is the absence rulers faggot. Contract law is all that's needed.

>Anarchy is the absence rulers faggot. Contract law is all that's needed.
But who enforces the rules? And how are those people paid? Why would i honor a contract?
Just ridiculous on every conceivable level.

>better is minarchism or national socialism
>better is X or the exact opposite of X
Jow Forumstards are THIS dumb

>Who enforces the rules
Contracts will specify a third party private enforcer, or insurance, paid for by one or both of the signers.
>How are people paid?
Same way everyone has ever been paid. The one making the purchase hands over money in exchange for whatever.
>Why would I honor the contract?
See #1

>third party private enforcer, or insurance
Hmm...

Attached: Annotation 2019-01-01 000949 - Copy.jpg (790x94, 37K)

Not even close. The state holds a monopoly on violence. It will kill you before it lets you go. What I mentioned are competing businesses that anyone can choose to interact with or not.

fuck your contract. I have a bigger army , I'll take what I want

No you don't. This is my fantasy. You're a tiny little faggot.

>>Not even close. The state holds a monopoly on violence. It will kill you before it lets you go. What I mentioned are competing businesses that anyone can choose to interact with or not.
Please elaborate more on a defection from an agreement. There doesn't necessarily have to be one that is made between two individuals mediated by a third party with the power to enforce the terms, but not enough to control swathes of territory and enact their own terms, at least not yet. The two bargaining parties can comprise of multiple people. A defection would either have to be prevented by threat of economic punishment or violence, which can also come forth as retaliation for economic punishment or as a way to mitigate economic damage. The third party would have to be stronger than either of these two groups and one of the two groups who would want to be capable of defecting would in turn have to grow their strength and threaten to overpower this third party. Hasn't this sort of thing already played itself out in the development of human societies? Individual anarchies leads to a Thucydides trap scenario where individuals coalesce to pursue a common foreign policy.

Thanks to crypto that third party can also be the contract executing itself. If not that, and the defecting party resists the agreement of enforcement, then the defector will lose all credibility. It'd be suicide to go to such extremes as no one would trust any contract they signed so in most cases, it'll be cheaper to accept the agreement's penalties. Most importantly, what you described as each party consisting of multiple groups with potentially massive resources requiring a more powerful third party to be the enforcer will most certainly happen. It doesn't matter if it does because none of those parties are a state. No one not involved in the contract is legally required to interact with it in any way as I am legally required to pay taxes to pay for my government's shenanigans.

Ancaps need to read this
unqualified-reservations.org/2010/02/from-mises-to-carlyle-my-sick-journey/

As admirable as your dreams if liberty may be anarchism is not the way to achieve them. In fact you have got your definition of properly rights wrong they are not a priori but rather delegated to you by a sovereign . It's not the presence of a state but the lack of secure power that causes the crime , social discord and excessive bureaucracy you despise . Hoppe was on the right track though with his recognition of the importance of hierarchy and his defence of monarchy and traditional society , he just couldnt break out if the liberal paradigm and the pseudo philosophy of praxeology .

reddit.com/r/Anarcho_Capitalism/comments/3ucp8y/i_was_beat_up_by_left_anarchists_in_greece/

ancaps need to read this, always cracks me up

I'm your former sovereign. Your body once belong to me and now it's yours. Pay your taxes

OK, can we end this here? Or take it in another direction cus this is it.

How would anarcho-capitalism affect small businesses and average people? If big businesses don't need no laws then the average kinsfolk don't neither.

Anarchy just means you aren't beholden to others. Capitalism means you have the moral right to own property (can kick others off of your land and secure your goods). The beauty of this system is that you can still implement governments for central planning as long as the citizens join voluntarily and have the right to secede. The hard part is deciding how natural resources (especially land) are allocated. It also requires an intelligent population since it's based on self governance.

Based and lolipilled, OP. Natsoc is probably still better because better cunnies

Why politics always come late? Muh 3000 year old democrazy muh 1800 ancap

Hibrid AI, vote system based on meritocracy and rewarding citizens on blockchain govern issued tokens, wich you could use to gain social benefits. T. Socialism for the smarts.

Good luck keeping track of f****** billions of people

That would be globalism. Anarcho capitalism should be achieved through many small
scale communities that can survive independently but still form trade alliances should they choose to.

For the 14 year old "based"-posters, it is the ideology to go.

For anyone with a brain, it is something useless and inpractical to laugh at. Just like blockchain "tech".

we already live in ancap society, the state is merely a tool for big corporations

Attached: Deq43xNVAAA_rBR.jpg (898x790, 63K)

cope
your banking and insurance system is fucking finished kike

Fuck (((Marxism)))
Fuck (((Capitalism))
The future is fash

CHOAM?

Good luck trying to force the white man to pay for said billions without having Big Daddy Government steal their paychecks.

Their income would drastically increase, giving them more economic power

problem is that most people don't see it on a long enough timeline and assume its unworkable when in reality its an inevitability in one way or another. New technology will produce more automation which will render the state symbolic at best. this is already the case in many places with financial powers holding the real executive power rather then legislators. just look at 1975 New York, what essentially amounts to the cities politicians capitulating to private powers due to the incompetence of their financial management.

What comes next is decentralization of organization, information and legislative force.