BSV mines >100MB block

How is block size a scaling solution? Won't the chain just become a gorillion bytes soon enough?

fuck off craig

Thats the point dummy

Bitcoin is business and data centers, not Raspberry Pie

Increasing the block size has major drawbacks
- blocks need a longer time span to propagate through the network hence increasing the probability of mining conflics (temporary forks in the chain)
- The blockchain will probably grow to petabytes soon which limits its replication facots (only a few nodes within large mining farms will store a copy of the cahin) hence harming decentralisation

[spoiler]Also I cant see how $0,87$ is an adequate cost to replicate 100 MB of data across several hundred (?) nodes within the BSV network. This kind of suggests that BSV is already way more centralized than we could have imagined[/spoiler]

Attached: bsv_is_a_scam.png (1085x1084, 186K)

And so are you my friend

So essentially BSV managed to create a blockchain infrastucure that is probably more centralised as Ripple with only a few full noded in China and India and at the same time still have all drawbacks of proof-of-work like shitty transaction speed

>Let me call him a redditfag because I don't have a rebuttal
Kys pajeet

Attached: northcorea.jpg (1406x1000, 383K)