Does chainlink make iexec obsolete?

Attached: knotbrainlet.png (645x729, 127K)

good answer
can chainlink do compute? Yes or no

Attached: 47384483_10157052675232975_2196106105174622208_n.jpg (179x281, 6K)

>what is town crier

no, chainlink is a json parser created by a philosophy major

>cant answer yes or no
town crier is not a decentralized computer

Iexec, like any other crypto project needs oracles, for example there is an AI app on the Iexec network that needs oracles to work. Web oracles they call it at Iexec

user it's a war between Iexec and Link, both are really good projects and I don't know which one of the two may be better and surcalss the other one.... or they will live toghter.
Link is for smart contract security, the compunting part is not yet implemented by them, it's more easy that Iexec will use Link that link will implement cloud infrastructure in their roadmap

P.S. I don't consider HOLOCHAIN or IOTA, because I think they are unlikley to succeed (HOLOCHAIN is obviovusly a failiure... just consieder the name of the token ''HOT''...lol, laughable)

Golem is a jew joke

Urbit may be the under the radar gem, but it's an amatorial failiure project runned nostalgic 90 age nerds men

>it's a war between iexec and link
no one has ever implied this, if anything link actually helps iExec. It has been known that link and iexec are teammates more than anything.

iExec's goal isn't oracles. Link's is. They are both working to do separate things and you'd be delusional to think otherwise. iExec is airbnb of decentalized cloud computing and link is a smart contract oracle...

no, but ethereum makes things like iexec and chainlink obsolete, ironically

no it doesn't lol iexec is a marketplace for cloud compute tasks as well as a dapp platform

Lol yeah. LINK can do everything. I've heard it's going to cure cancer and discover the meaning of life.

> Being this delusional

>LINK is a nice project but does not offchain computing
it does though

You've got to be trolling. towncrier lets chainlink nodes compute anything in trusted execution environments (read: in private and tamperproof).

You mean Ethereum that can't even handle kripto-kitties and it's only been used for scammy ICO in 2017?

ethereum will be used to move around chainlink tokens. that's pretty much all it will be used for in the future.

how can you compare a dying piece of shit to a fucking moonin token like link?

Attached: icx_vs_link.jpg (1884x612, 269K)

No it doesn't lmfao

> he takes the fundamentals by the price per coin and coinmarketcap rank

Normie fag detected

the fucking token price tells alot about a project.
if a token can survive a fucking bear market, then it prolly means it has a great value, you fuckikng cuck. your shitcoin died like the fucking piece of shit it is. this just shows how you coin simply correlates with BTC price and is only a pnd/hype/shitcoin scheme

the only reason link survived is because of the memes. It's scaring people into holding when in reality the coin has zero intrinsic value

> he doesn't know if anything, Intel or IBM will bail them out.

He doesn't know, lol

Golem makes both obsolete.

golem is absolute RENDERCOIN TRASH

Surived to the bear market... ''muhh.....''

it lost a lot of vlaue > 80% of values like any other shitcoin... it suffered less because of the religious cult of hodlers it has

While Iexec is considered a ''french bagette'' by ameritards here... but in the end there is no reason why Iexec shouldn't render LINK obsolete, there's no such ''sure thing'' when it comes to investing

jej now we know you're trolling

Jump of a cliff

DYE-DYOR?

no u
post link that says link can do cloud supercomputing

>Town Crier

literaly WHO?

yes

Chainlink does computing. Somehow iExec is supposed to do it more securely, but no one has been able to explan how. Still holding a small bag as a gamble

chainlink does it all my dude

wtf dude? didnt you hear? chainlink will allow for decentralized computaion...with TEEs and SGX enclaves... are you fucking retarded?

read this : blog.goodaudience.com/chainlink-the-missing-piece-to-the-god-protocol-fd455dde92ab

You're a brainlet. Every PhD is technically a doctor in philosophy, but that doesn't mean their degree is literally in philosophy. They are computer scientists.

> being this unaware

I know it doesn't change what you're saying cause the RLC graph looks the same, but you just showed how much of a nigger you are by mixing up ICX and RLC

>read muh blog!
no thanks

Is vishnu in chainlink?

>FAGGOTS AND NIGGERS
that really got my attention, thanks based alarm poster

Look link has like 3500 btc volume while rlc has 5... yes 5 btc on binance
Lmao yikes

>babbys first pump
rlc had 3000 btc volume weeks ago

I don't get all this contrarians against RLC... I would like to know which coin do they hold? Bitcoin? Ok, everyone holds bitcoin, but bitcoin can't do a x100 in your life time existence

It would be funny to go back in the days and see if Microsoft holders had this laughs at them, I think yes, they were laughed on them

Both are Dapps which don't require shittoken AT ALL to work.
Even if these things happen to be successful RLC and LINK will crash at one moment or another to their true value which is 0.

Companies will just use ETH or stablecoin instead of buying stupid hypervolatile shitcoins which purpose is to be spent on only one thing.
Imagine if you had to pay in wallmartcoin, then in carrefourcoin then in butcherdollar everytime you go buy some shit, it would be completely retarded, the purpose of a currency is that it's widely accepted everywhere, a currency that can only buy one service is idiotic (unless it's part of some scheme to psychologically manipulate the user by making him spend more than he should, like coins in F2P games).

Besides in the future all dapps will have to work in synergy just like the existing software, subway tokens like LINK or RLC are an absolute hindrance to that and will progressively be scrapped, you will be able to use them but so will you be able to use stablecoins (guess which one is more convenient for a business).
The entire purpose of these things was to make you believe you got something in return for handling them your ETH (which actually have an economic reason to exist = incentive the security of the network).

Attached: Arguments.jpg (679x516, 88K)

>use ETH or a stablecoin
>converts to RLC or LINK in the backend
>same effect

next

Shhhh let him fud so we can accumulate more

>doing 2 transactions when you could make one
Besides even if it does that the value would still crash because of token velocity.
See the conclusion of that:
>medium.com/coinmonks/token-velocity-what-it-is-and-why-you-should-care-56ab2592b8c4

Utility tokens, including LINK, are garbage, these arguments have NEVER BEEN DEBUNKED on this board ever, most developper even refuse to aknowledge it on their communication channels but in conferences EVERYONE know it, that's why utility tokens are the ones that plummeted the hardest.
This will be brought even more under the spotlight when security tokens will become more and more prevalent, screencap this.

Done automatically not a problem. Nope.

Won't be high token velocity in RLC because it's paid to workers after a timeframe. Won't be high token velocity in LINK because it's paid to nodes after a timeframe. Also LINK is further held as collateral. supply is held up for both.

Basically they will always be converted on the backend to their own token because it's already set up that way & they are businesses. If they use someone elses token they don't gain from their creation that they own a huge supply of. Simple.

>Shhhh let him fud so we can accumulate more
That FUD got me.
Any user with a 140 IQ could make me comfier about RLC and LINK reason to exist?

See
Right above you lad. can't miss it.

iEXEC isn't an oracle you dumb piece of shit. They've literally stated in their WP they'll need an oracle to function.
LINK is an oracle, and has acquired the hard tech from Town Crier to move into blockchain computing if they wish to.

From ATH its down 70%, but from it's real baseline (ignore Jan) it's barely down.

kys.

>Won't be high token velocity in RLC because it's paid to workers after a timeframe.
Could do the exact same thing with a stablecoin or ETH.
>. Also LINK is further held as collateral. supply is held up for both.
None will want to have a collateral priced in fucking subway tokens.

>Basically they will always be converted on the backend to their own token because it's already set up that way & they are businesses. If they use someone elses token they don't gain from their creation that they own a huge supply of. Simple.

Your argument is basically "since they have tokens (that cost them absolutely NOTHING to create, remember) they will make them appreciate because reasons".
I don't think you realize how incredibly naive you sound.
They have like 10 differents safer way to make money from their protocol (consulting, support, integration of other business solutions, etc...) than betting on token prices, they have no contractual obligation to do so.

I used to be in both RLC and LINK in 2017 because I think the software behind is done by competent people, and that's the problem, I was in love with the project and not looking at the tokenomics which is absolute dogshit despite being the MOST IMPORTANT thing for anyone who isn't working for their companies and holding tokens.

The redpilling event for me was the Quantsamp controversy:
>coindesk.com/quantstamp-fire-buyers-say-faith-shaken-65-million-token

If I could buy shares in Gilles and Sergey companies I would do it right now, but I'm not going to buy their subway tokens.

Attached: quanstamp.jpg (311x162, 6K)

STAY POOR YOU MASSIVE PHAGGOT LMAOOOOOOOO

>I used to be in both RLC and LINK in 2017 because I think the software behind is done by competent people, and that's the problem, I was in love with the project and not looking at the tokenomics which is absolute dogshit despite being the MOST IMPORTANT thing for anyone who isn't working for their companies and holding tokens.
>The redpilling event for me was the Quantsamp controversy:
>>coindesk.com/quantstamp-fire-buyers-say-faith-shaken-65-million-token
>If I could buy shares in Gilles and Sergey companies I would do it right now, but I'm not going to buy their subway tokens.

You understimate the power of FOMO.. there is no reason to hold bitcoin, and this shitcoin is at 3000$

There's definitley MORE reason to hold Iexec or Link (stajing purpose,hype) than the king of shitcoins bitcoin

I'd rather have a token dominated by first world countries using it. Keep your pump and dumps.

Attached: Golem mainnet users.png (1664x658, 281K)