Which coin is going to be 51% attacked next: monero, dogecoin, bsv or litecoin?

ahhhh….not really user-kun
blog.coinbase.com/ethereum-classic-etc-is-currently-being-51-attacked-33be13ce32de

lol the whole point of sharkpool is to prove to everyone that BSV should be the only PoW coin. Are you people dense?

just bid more on nicehash and more scypt miners will switch from litecoin+doge merge mining to your nicehash attack since it is
paying more.

Attached: 1392477270661.png (583x498, 178K)

explain 51% attack to a brainlet

hostile corporate takeover

51% this happened
49% no it did not

yes it did
no no no

that thing 10 times and the 49% will say ok it happened

51% attacks take many blocks to achieve

But what exactly happens on blockchain? Since some org own 51% of all hashpower they can change blocks and cause double-spend?

Damn that's some nice explanation, appreciated

Attached: image.jpg (360x357, 17K)

there is 1 bitcoin
I give 1 btc to you MslNUgzK
everyone in the blockchain confirms this has happened.
You now own the bitcoin

a 51% attack is where some other guy is saying no actually what happened is you gave the bitcoin to me, IWRNlHiy
and then they buy up a lot of hash rate to create blocks in the alternate timeline where IWRNlHiy has the bitcoin and not MslNUgzK. this alternate timeline is now the longest chain.

You can't use nicehash to 51% attack brainlet.

youtube.com/watch?v=Lx9zgZCMqXE

Wat

you haven't seen hell have you

>We at NiceHash undertake all the necessary steps to prevent or help to prevent any market disruptions, market manipulations or misuse of NiceHash Hashing Power Marketplace. We have already banned users in the past who were causing problems and gaming the system.

>Please understand that in order to take appropriate actions in the case of 51% attack, we need reliable and verifiable information.

Basically nicehash would step in and stop it before they had the chance to do any real harm. Also, only low cap shitcoins are potentially 51% attackable by Nicehash. Exchanges are already aware of this possibility, and require a very large number of confirmations for coins with bad security. I've seen shitcoins where the exchange requires 500 confirmations for example.

>jesus

>demonic

Nice try retard

pr*ddie degenerate

I've been to Gary, IN

> (((they))) said it was a depiction of a thing therefore you should believe that despite the unmistakeable aesthetic intent behind it
> clearly not even educated enough about the topic to know the appearance of the room this appears in also
Just shut up and keep your head in the sand until you suffocate, faggot.

You seem angry user

Leave, religionfag.

DAG is piss. DAG coins will be the first to trend to zero. No one wants to sit there and connect to different nodes for 3hrs to find their balance.

KILL YOURSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!

kek saying you could attack any of the coins in the OP let alone for 5 figures of USD is like saying you could currently market sell 8.5 million bitcoins and you would get $4015 x 8.5 million

Attached: 1447100075727.jpg (1462x1462, 188K)

Zcash or verge probably. Although nobody even cares about verge enough to attack it AGAIN lel. At this point in time i doubt anybody would 51% attack monero due to the asic resistence. They really need to get randomjs implimented so there arent constant forks

follow SharkPoolCash and ari_cryptonized on twatter.

Monero doesn't even have a giga hash of power

Its basically who has the most skin in the game. Nakamoto consensus

scared sheep.

I work in exchanges and tons of the shitcoins get 51% attacked all the time. It's almost a daily occurrence.

That's proof of stake, not PoW.

True but considering an rx 580 produces only 1kh it would take 10's of thousands of those gpus to 51% attack monero and nice hash doesn't have that much disposable hash to do it either.

i saw a tweet that said otherwise. whose twatter wins?

>Monero doesn't even have a giga hash of power
The hash algo differs from bitcoin.