Linkies vs Quanties

Alright Linkies and Quanties, which one of the projects is going to win out? They are trying to do similar enough things that if one wins, the other becomes obsolete. My money is on Quant, but what do you guys think?

Attached: linkiesvsquanties.jpg (696x425, 33K)

Other urls found in this thread:

accordproject.org/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

the one that wins will be the one that introduces the leave externalities and friction to whatever smart contract platform that wins out.

that means if ethereum remains the de-facto monopoly on smart contracts and smart contract development, nothing that requires it's own token or pushes validation outside of ethereum is going to be something that doesn't.

the least externalities*

lmao qnt is trying to make blockchain to blockchain communicate and link is trying to use real world to blockchain communication. Two different things, plenty of room for both to be around

Simply not true, the description of Overledger is this... "Overledger is the world’s first blockchain operating system (OS) that not only connects blockchains to one another but also connects existing networks to blockchain and facilitates the creation of internet scale multi-chain applications otherwise known as mApps."

"but also connects existing networks to blockchain and facilitates the creation of internet scale multi-chain applications otherwise known as mApps"

"but also connects existing networks to blockchain"

"existing networks to blockchain"

Chainlink. Like no shit. How is this even a question at this point anymore... you have had over a year to look into these projects

Attached: Screenshot_20190103-133455_Firefox.jpg (1440x2960, 1.19M)

Eat shit quant shill.

I have 0% in Quant

why not have a bag of both?

Attached: DE4C28F1-0CB8-4B2A-952E-2E08A88BBF3A.png (584x1060, 928K)

Buy link

truth is, qnt is so powerful its going to bring all of crypto to bear upon the industry of the planet 3 years ahead of schedule.

This tide is gonna lift all ships, link included.

You say "my money is on Quant" but dont own any. Herp a derp.

Attached: 1517499889811.jpg (720x720, 61K)

Quant seems built upon hype. Do they have a minimum viable product?

Which one has the town crier infrastructure.

ONE IS A BAND AID FIX, THE OTHER IS A VERY GOOD INVESTMENT

>They are trying to do similar enough things that if one wins, the other becomes obsolete.
Only a guy with cerebral palsy would believe this.

due diligence, bud. you'll be glad you did.

I'll give you a random piece you won't often see - scroll to the bottom and check out the partners tabs.

just one of many giants working with verdian and iso 307.

accordproject.org/

If Overledger is competing with Chainlink on oracles, then it has no chance. Obviously Chainlink is already soliditifing itself as the go to oracle solution. Is literally one company using Overledger for oracles in any way? Because I haven't heard of any.

Secondly, they have zero oracle network. So it's centralized.

Thirdly and most importantly, big, wide sweeping projects like this are worthless because they are trying to do too any things. See shit like VeChain. Chainlink has a DIRECT usecase. Quant is already trying to do too much. A messaging system between blockchains? Cool. But they also provide oracles too? Nah. Already getting convoluted. "Do one thing and do it well" is not a meme. Quant will get lost in blockchain obscurity because it's not focused on doing one thing well. Not too mention, there's plenty of competition. Chainlink has no serious competition.

Enough with the ISO TC 307 shit you Quant fags. Are you so delusional, you think they will let Verdian implement just his own company into the standards? Do you really think the people involved are that stupid? Fucking brainlets.
>Hur durr Gilbert wrote it.
>Quant will be the global standard for everything blockchain that ever exists.