archive.fo
>The world's richest couple announced in a joint statement Wednesday that they are getting a divorce "after a long period of loving exploration and trial separation."
>The divorce could drastically reduce Jeff Bezos' stake in Amazon and open the door for his wife to become one of its largest shareholders, with new leverage at the company, according to divorce lawyers and corporate governance experts.
>Washington, where the family lives and Amazon is based, is a community property state, which means assets accrued during the marriage must be split equally in a divorce. Given that Amazon launched after the pair were married, this rule would likely apply to virtually all of Jeff Bezos' current $137 billion net worth, experts say.
Oh no no no....
Jeff gets JUSTed
Someone had to save the world from Amazon.
Who would have guessed it would be a woman running it into the ground
Should I sell
>Who would have guessed it would be a woman running it into the ground
If you look into their history in early amazon you'll realize it wouldn't have worked out without MacKenzie's financial and professional support.
Also this is totally Jeff's fault. His dick goes doki doki over some BPD turbostacy and he throws away his family (and half the wealth). What an embarrassment.
Serves him right for being evil and bald.
>Amazon's biggest shareholder is going to be a woman
If that is not a clear indicator to start shorting the fuck out of AMZN I don't know what is. Crash bigger than BTC 2018.
BPD big pussy darling?
More like Jeff BOZO
If you haven't already shorted all major tech companies as part of a "get woke go broke" shorting strategy, you'll never make it to the moon. They're telegraphing their collapses from 20 miles away.
Who do you think I am? I am a price action-oriented kind of guy. After a company gets woke I wait for the price action to reflect that, and then I short. Yeah, I miss some profits from the original move, but you have to remember that there are enough wealthy leftists to manipulate this kind of shit. You can never be too cautious.
BASED AND MARRIAGEPILLED
every
single
time
Went would I short? Company's ran by women actually do well as they bring a different way of thinking to corporations
Warren is licking his lips, on his way to number one scrooge mcduck on the planet again!
Yeah, I agree. Any women-majority companies you know about so that I can put my entire net worth in them? Oh, I'm going to tell my wife's son about this, I'm sure he will also want to get in!
I hope she sells her share to a competitor and really fucks him over.
His game is on the level of a pajeet.
I agree I hope he really gets fucked. If we are lucky out of his anger he will hire a fucking army of lobbyists and work them to death until all divorce laws are removed and replaced. Then phase 2 will be making those laws retroactive and suing his wife to oblivion, just before he finally asks Alexa to send a hitman to her house, same-day delivery.
srly. our of respect for his wife and family he could of at least had some discretion.
>ur of respect for his wife and family he could of at least had some discretion.
If my family had billions of dollars for all I care my dad could rape a newborn in the ass. Like anyone cares lol.
Next, jeff marries his new lover, then gets divorced again. At that point jeff's fortune is cut from 120b to 30b, making two of the wealthiest women in the world women who have divorced him
Surprised you haven't. Then again this is biz...
ELON JUST
bipolar disorder
This is just one of those vague politically correct retarded things that journalists like to parrot
How is a fucking women-only company legal
If you do the hiring privately you can hire whoever you want. Mc Donald's hires linkies only and no one sues them for discriminating against better investors.
I laughed
Either the journalist didn't ask a divorce attorney or the divorce attorney doesn't know shit (which is true, family law is for the dregs).
Washington state has an equitable and fair provision in their community property law. It isn't a 50% split as is implied in the article.
What's more, it's usually possible to structure one's assets so they are less vulnerable in a divorce even after the marriage, particularly if a corporate board needs your stocks to be safe (but a $300 an hour divorce attorney isn't going to know that)
hope she market sells
>we'll just trust a woman with 70B worth of stocks during a bear market because this marriage thing forces it to happen
Linkies?