This is exactly what I keep saying. Redditors and normies still think adoption looks like pic related...

This is exactly what I keep saying. Redditors and normies still think adoption looks like pic related. If you're holding any currency crypto, you are still stuck in this mindset. This is why they will not catch on to Chainlink until it hits the top 10 or even top 20.

Adoption means the 4th industrial revolution.
Not Ripple and Nano accepted at the barber's shop.

Attached: adoption.png (1716x1537, 1.37M)

well redditors are ultra normies what did you expect?

Wow, awesome unique perspective OP, how did you garner such unparalleled insight?

>Yea, Nano is going to take me to the moon. The only thing you have to invest in this market is Nano, Bitcoin, and Litecoin.

Attached: d1517715410527.png (357x368, 54K)

Exactly. Also investors think in terms of currencies and marketcaps etc. Token represents a piece of the protocol. The best example is chainlink of course. It is a protocol used for connecting data to blockchain. SMPT is a protocol to used for email transmission. Imagine owning a piece of email transmission protocol. Go buy chainlink

It's unreal to me that these double digit IQ insect people can't get it in their heads that blockchain can be used for more than just digital money.

Good for the rest of us. If they were all smart, most of us would not have had enough time to accumulate LINK.

Attached: 1546860348781.jpg (537x640, 161K)

God damn crypto reddit is fucking retarded

>buy my bags so i dont have to keep lowering my sell

This image on twitter: "it's actually xrp"
this image on reddit: "why no nano?"
this image on Jow Forums: "why no chinklink?"

you're also bluepilled and delusional

crypto adoption just means wealthy people start storing their wealth in it. payment systems are useless.

ChainLink isn't a currency coin you dumbass, that's like saying you want to pay for you coffee with a server switch

neither is ETH

Lol stfu 0xBTC fag

you're right that use a currency is very weak adoption and the true future is in platforms, but link is worthless.
Oracle providers have zero network effects which makes them a commodity. It's always easy to swap the oracle provider with no impact on the rest. Just because of that, even if chainlink wasn't a badly designed vaporware but something perfect, it would get cloned preventing any value flow to token holders.
Worst of all the whole thing is only a temporary placeholder until data sources start to sign their data, which probably means a year once current data providers catch on there's money to make.

Link is very similar to zrx. It's also utterly worthless, didn't stop it from pumping high on several occasions. The coinbase pump was the last one and now it's going to zero. Zrx holders are also similarly deluded in that they magically think that dexes getting popular mean zrx goes up.

Pumps are the best time to sell.

t. someone who has never used a relational database or quite possibly any database at all

Attached: face aoba 4534.png (327x409, 147K)

I love it when people type out these psuedointellectual takedowns of Chainlink. You seriously think you are smarter than Sergey and Ari Jules.... don't make me laugh.

Nobody is going to pay to use your protocol when there's others available for free

What crypto if any do you hold and value?

>What is collateral

This is defining difference between LINK and any other shitcoin. Name another token that will be used to not only back the delivery of data of collateral, but also be exclusively used to pay node operators. I'll wait.

upvoted