if you can
Redpill me on Iexec, please
Samuel Miller
Samuel Allen
Just use the search page, it's already been shilled thousands of times
Aiden Morales
I haven't seen relevant FUD beside tokenomiks and french team
Nathaniel Johnson
up
Ian Green
iExec is unfuddable.
>LINK makes RLC obsolete
>French team bagettes
>Tokenomics are shit
>Muh utility token
This is the level of fud while the team has connections with:
>Intel
>IBM
>TFCloud (multibillion chinese cloud company)
>Ubisoft
>Orange
>Huawei
>RSK
Isaiah Clark
thanks for the rare RLC pepe.
It's literally unfuddable. LINK shills try so hard to fud it but it's always the same lame fud.
I truly believe that RLC will be 1000x what it's worth by 2021
Christopher Richardson
>
this bread was pretty epic, opened my eyes on RLC so i saved it.
Joseph Nelson
>>Tokenomics are shit
I still don't understand the tokenomiks. Let's say that people utilize the token for their compunting jobs and so on
Then the RLC bros stake their RLC and get rewarded with other RLC coin for providing the correct computation. Then it's common opinion that those ''stakers'' would dump the gained RLC in the market, (driving the price down)... is this the tokenomic FUD?
Also why doesn't it apply also to bitcoin? Becaue of the store of value meme?
Ryan Lewis
The FUD they say is that people would market buy and market dump instantly after each task is executed, so price won't move since there will be an equal ammount of BUY orders than SELL orders.
They don't take into account
>Cloud providers will compete for a task by staking more RLC, so more RLC staked = more security on the result.
>Task staking takes some time, and I guess it depends on the security of the result, so more security = more validations of PoCo (more time staked).
>If network it's at full capacity, RLC will be a scarce resource, that will drive the price up for those that need to execute or stake new tasks.
Dylan Diaz
Long suffering holder of 20k. Let’s get this sit going