Buy your ticket

Buy your ticket.

Attached: 1540201170947.jpg (704x712, 130K)

*ahem*
FUCK RLC SHILLS
AND FUCK JANNIES

>Target acquired:
>Please pay 1000 RLC or be iexecuted.
>(Y/N)?

Attached: iExecubot.jpg (720x720, 59K)

8888888888888 get RLC 1000$

All in

17k, when is a good time to sell do you think?

Attached: 8A5E06E0-93FB-4D82-A588-67526388C28B.jpg (1365x2048, 152K)

after v4 comes out, maybe save some for v5

ALL IN brah LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>Intel & IBM will use a unregistered security

These companies don't partner, they buy up good ideas! Intel & IBM most likely can't purchase this shitcoin as its an unregistered security.

Go ahead argue, show that you have 0 clue about securities & the laws that govern them...

>unregistered security
It's a utilitycoin you fucking retard, anything that has utility by definition cannot be a security.

Get fucked retard.

>Go ahead argue, show that you have 0 clue about securities & the laws that govern them...

>no point: the post

No my point was proven before you posted , you just confirmed it!
Thanks

>hurr durr if you argue you're automatically wrong
>even though I won't bother to prove it
yikes

K, how do i KNOW you don't know about securities...
>MUH UTILITYCOIN
check the fuckin securities law
No mention of it
this is a security as of sole benefit!

Go read up newfag!

Nigger you don't even know what a security is.
If you think iExec is a security you don't understand what iExec is.
I think you're trolling.

also, this applies to RLC too due to its perfectly decentralized design.

>A top SEC official said Thursday that Bitcoin and Ethereum are not securities, adding that a key point in deciding whether a coin is a security is whether a cryptocurrency network is sufficiently decentralized.

Not to mention, the SEC will have such a hard time deciding which coins are securities that they'll most likely abandon the idea of classifying them at all.

>I think you're trolling.
I think you have NEVER read about securities & what is involved in correctly releasing them. Only 1 way to get around not registering them... Sell them to 'Accredited investors' i.e have $1MM in the Bank, its called Series D funding.

So you think Intel & IBM will risk this?
This is most likely why they didn't purchase iExec just partnered. They don't want the liability...
FYI decentralisation has noting to do with securities...I have no clue why people think it does

Tell me, how is RLC a security?

>So you think Intel & IBM will risk this?
Intel is working with iExec to create a market prediction dApp.
IBM already has a worker running.
Yes. They already are, retard.

>This is most likely why they didn't purchase iExec just partnered
They wouldn't even partner with them if they even had a smell of it being a security.

>FYI decentralisation has noting to do with securities
Yes actually it does. You clearly don't know anything about securities.

Nice attempt at fudding though, iExec is literally unfuddable. Next 2000x

Attached: 1534803314085.jpg (306x306, 20K)

>Tell me, how is RLC a security?
Na, no point it talking to the delusional...It took me a while to convince the XRPedos that its a possibility...now they accept it. Much like you would if you bothered to read...
>Yes actually it does. You clearly don't know anything about securities.
KEK, see no point in talkin to the delusional!

>Na, no point it talking to the delusional...It took me a while to convince the XRPedos that its a possibility...now they accept it. Much like you would if you bothered to read...
Confirmed troll. GG retard.

I bet you have a huge stake in RLC

I guarantee RLC 2x's by next week

Attached: 14245.jpg (997x496, 92K)

>I bet you have a huge stake in RLC
No sorry

You think that laws conceived in the '30s talk about decentralisation & you expect me to think your not delusional...really?

Yea, stay dumb shill!

>implying the laws from the 30s can just be slapped onto new groundbreaking technologies
>implying the SEC will make coins that are sufficiently decentralized and have utility a security
>implying you aren't a retard

KEK, keep proving how delusional you are!
It would take to much time just to bring you back to reality...its not worth my time.
Best of luck
Fuckin Zoomers

kek, good try retard maybe next time.
Prove me wrong.

>Prove me wrong.
Look up series funding A,B,C,D. Take a good look @ D. (as mentioned before)
Check out what makes up a IPO, compare to ICO, Notice the similarities!
Find out why PoW is under control of the CFTC and not the SEC.
Look in why ICOs are not under control of the CFTC.
I am not going to write you a fuckin book!

>still hasn't proven RLC is a security
good luck in life retard

I have given you all you need!
Sorry you to dumb to use google
Zoomer Confirmed!

>name a bunch of random securities nonsense
>never makes a point
congrats you could say the same for every crypto in existence
kys

Bro your FUD is weak af
Just buy some RLC and have some peace of mind

Yep. 2k RLC is suicide insurance

>name a bunch of random securities nonsense
Thanks for proving my delusional point yet again!

>congrats you could say the same for every crypto in existence
Nope, not the PoW ones! see this why YOU need to do some research! I have given you all the things you need to search google. No thanks i don't like delusional shills!

Seriously use google please learn!
Its really not complicated!

>proving my delusional point yet again!
Your delusional point is right, retard. LOL!

>see RLC thread
>It's full of the same "its duh futur XDDD" shit as always
>Cultist shills in full force

Remember not to reply to RLC shills. Don't sage, just hide.

>he called his own point delusional
sorry i needed to react to it, too fucking funny.
Why do you even try LOL

Attached: tapestry,940x-bg,f8f8f8-c,110,110,705,602.2.jpg (705x602, 65K)

>can't disprove RLC being the future
>still thinks he's gonna make it with random shitcoins
500$ EOY

How heavy are your bags right now? Coinfess

This.

Fuuuuuuuuuck almost