Assume perfect distribution of a token. What proof protocol is the fastest?

Assume perfect distribution of a token. What proof protocol is the fastest?

Tron is taking off because of it's SR system. It's super centralized. I don't think it will stand the test of time, but it will make a lot of people rich for now.
Centralization is a huge fear with Proof of stake. Even proof of work.
But let's assume that we could actually not worry about centralization. Let's assume that the token we're using the stake the network is very decentralized and will always be.
What would be the ideal protocol to run on top of it? I think it'd have to be some form of proof of stake, because obviously a token is involved.
There is DPoS. Like tron. but is there a more sophisticated version?
Is there a list of PoS network approaches that I can look at?

Attached: 1547627878275.jpg (1080x1152, 177K)

ill give her PoD, proof of dick

proof protocol

you have wrong presumptions, the fastest will be that that requires no confirmations, as soon as the TX is in the mem pool it should be solid

PoW or PoS or ANYTHING DOES NOT MATTER, it matters economically and for the distribution

Dpos is clearly faster than pos and pow. So how are my presumptions wrong?

DPoS is way to confirm

originally BTC had 0 confirm TXs, that allowed it to be instant, as soon as you broadcasted the TX you are good

today BCH is about to reallow that with their canonical ordering

we have some other projects that can do it too, for example if the master nodes provide insurance for the TX in the mem pool

to be the fastest you have to forget about the confirmation, it does not matter what the confirmation is it will be always slower since itself has to be propagated

so 0 confirms will be at the speed of the internet

Insurance is a good idea.

Confirmation are needed for consensus though. And you can't have consensus without confirmations

My primary concern is smart contracts and not money

yes but it does not matter what it is
it matter for coin distribution and economic intensives
PoS is really bad economically

Just assume distribution is a given though.

Proof of Work is a method of distribution that gives the coin generator intensive to sell and therefore create a price discovery mechanism

Proof of Stake gives you the ability to make new coins out of old ones and there is no way for new people to get in or for fair price discovery

Staking only work if the supply is unlimited as is in the real world fiat

If I stake I have no intensive to sell as the more I hold the more the price goes up and my stack goes up too. All that works only to the point where people just stop using the platform.

While with proof of work you have many many checks and balances.

nano dag tech with DPOS is the fastest right now.binance gave out stats about the fastest cryptos.

DPoS
>Tx is final because the delegate says so
Just use PayPal brah

she streams on twitch

Name?

user, does your mom know you're on Jow Forums again?

proof of stake can also be compensated with transaction fees

instead of interest

You don't understand what he is writing about

i do.
he's saying that proof of stake MUST be rewarded with interest, when it in fact can be rewarded with transaction fees.

the troublesome part is, I can't tell you how I've managed to accomplish incentivized distribution

the staking token would be inflationary too. meets all the requirements

DiovanaKoni
Just don't become an orbiter that gives thots money, user.

I've busted many a nut over her instagram photos, one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen

good taste fellow african american

I am saying that you have no incentive to get rid of your staked coins
and new coins produced be the staking, as interest or TX fees also will be held, and no coins will be sold, therefore you have stagnant system that is not flowing (no current, not currency) and it is stagnant and retracting, it has no means to expand its user base.

Nano is DPOS, decentralized, instant, free, and green. Might be what you are looking for.

how many cryptos to empty my sack in her?

Paypal will ban me for selling certain items. Nano is decentralized, so they cannot.

she unironically lives down the road from me
t. floripa fag

>perfect distribution
no token has perfect distribution, especially anything printed or sold to provide funds for developers or anybody else.

dpos is already obsolete.

iotex's roll dpos is the most sophisticated and decentralised dpos implementation yet. applications for block producers are open now, and anyone can be a block producer. also upbit is this week.

I'm coming up with a new sidechain protocol

Hrm. If the staking goes stagnant that creates demand on one side of my incentive structure to start generating more (scarcity)

That's funny.
Because I solved this problem

you are creating a competitor
like in stinkie linkies
if it works, there will be 10 more like it pop over night
the underlying value of a chain comes from the hashrate
if you have 10 new chains, that does the same as the one original, if the one original retains most of the hash it will be the most valuable

go get your dick wet user!

Ok.
So you're telling me to have a marketing strategy, right?

Btw
The idea I am think of is a sidechain but requires inflationary proof of work or proof of capacity as the base network.
Proof of capacity is more energy efficient than pow. And I've seen no good arguments against it.

So I may have to create a new chain too. Which will be hard to get people to adopt value into especially for the sidechain to work.
So I want to explore atomic swaps and paying transaction fees with swapped tokens

>Proof of capacity
is ok because it is regular mining, all the rules apply as in PoW, or gold mining

holy fu*k i love redheads

>t.pedo

Thanks fren, I won't..

Which is why I believe it's fundamentally necessary in the stack. The staking tokens inherit this property but in a different way.

Now all I need to figure out is if there is a property of the network i can read to dynamically adjust how much of the PoC token is mined.
I believe it needs to be inflationary, but my intuition tells me it needs to be based on the size of the network or some other property associated with size

What I'm "worried" about the most right now is receiving tokens as payment. Maybe as a means of temporarily boosting network value, especially if the PoC value will take over with adoption

She told me she was 35! That bitch set me up, your honor!

Kek, nice one