Give me one reason why ChainLink wont be worth more than BTC ath

give me one reason why ChainLink wont be worth more than BTC ath

Attached: flat,550x550,075,f.jpg (477x550, 42K)

it would make sergey the lord of the planet

BTW i'm 100% all in link hahahhahah, but I think it's only that thought that doesn't compute kek

but I mean if he does, he def deserve it

Attached: jvfijOF.png (963x1405, 62K)

because everythign dumps ahrd after the mainnet release and chainlink ahsnt released one yet. also only useful products rise again after the mainnet pump and link will be full of bugs and errors and not rise again becase fo this.

I think that's why mainnet is not yet released, remember that link has been on testnet for almost a year now, and in developpement since before ETH.
also they do regular audits.
on the bugs part I think they got it covered

Jesus ive heard 8 year old downs syndrome kids mutter out better fud

And this is bad because?

Attached: serg.png (1920x1080, 2.57M)

Because it makes no sense for chainlink to be worth more than a Big Mac, it would defeat its entire purpose. Until Mc'Donalds starts selling a $20k Big Mac, it's not happening.

chainlink will probably be in the top 3 for a long time.
I don't think it can beat BTC, assuming BTC becomes the defacto (base layer) world currency after it's run up and stabilising SoV value.

it would defeat the purpose of the coin

>>

Chainlink is the biggest scam coin of them all, if you know you know I guess :p

>wearing pants

Attached: 1543446043481.png (750x1189, 142K)

I don’t see why nodes can’t use ETH for staking. Is it because ETH doesn’t have the transfer and call function? Doesn’t seem like that could be a big deal. I just don’t see the need for the token to exist besides it being used for a fundraising mechanism. Using a stable coin doesn’t make sense because stable coins need to rely on decentralized oracles but I don’t see why nodes can’t stake ETH for collateral.

Would it be because if ETH agents 51%ed then the entire chainlink network would be toast? But if that’s the case chainlink would be useless as it won’t have any smart contracts to feed data to on the ETH main chain.

Can’t use DAI because stable coins rely on decentralized oracles but using ETH would work fine. The volatility wouldn’t be an jssue bc link will be just as volatile

Attached: 1547225603210.png (900x729, 129K)

this

Jow Forums is attacking after the singularity i will buy Jow Forums.org and the only board they be able to browse will be /nolinkersbtfo/

weird flex

becuase economy works on limited finite ratios

that being said, it might go beyond btc, but it will take alot longer than you think.
like decade bear.

remember how long it took apple, facebook, amazon, google ,and even btc to get to its current valuation.
alot of chipping away at smaller market ratios and steal as much ratio from btc as possible. ofc tact and timliness in these things are real important, cant jump the gun.

because theres no reason chainlink should have a market cap of 20 trillion dollars. its market cap right now is 177 billion. its not going to increase its market cap roughly 100,000 fold for no reason.

The coin pump and dump was just that, a pump and dump. internet meme coins can be created easily now and that will just get easier in the future.

The future is AI, not memecoins

So instead invest in Google, IBM, Amazon, Apple, and the underlying tech and real estate trusts that hold those servers.

you swingtraded and lost and this is the greatest fud you can muster?

apologies for bad math

Chainlink's market cap is 177 MILLION which means it would need to increase its market cap by 100,000,000 fold for no reason.

It'll never happen, the spike was a fluke and was just like the dot com bubble. Tech will advance in smart contracts but what i said earlier still stands

and u can't count?
this isn't even reddit tier, did someone post chainlink on tumblr

mcap doesn't mean anything and when 90% of link is staked it will be worth $200,000

what prevents a company like IBM, Amazon, Google, etc creating their own block chain and their own nodes with their own coin to do what chainlink does?

They have more money and resources to do that, why, if chainlink cannot be copied, is their shit coin worth so little?

Btc ATH was like 300billion dum dum

Because BTC is the first and has a strong brand and thus will rule crypto forever. You know, like MySpace.

>The future is AI
kek

The crypto normies are like Africans, walking around their patch of land in misery, their feet treading on top of precious metals and diamond and recourses. We Stinkies ar the evolved white man that will come and take them back out from under them before they can even unstupifu themelselves. We will pick up the diamonds they saw as just rocks and polish them to their potential and rule the world. Chain link is love. Chain link is life. Heil Hitler.

magic

Attached: 1548074729172.png (1590x838, 246K)

nice doctored image, sir

le big mac

Attached: download (2).jpg (300x168, 6K)

if you think gold is a technology or a "brand", you have seriously and fundamentally misunderstood what bitcoin is, and why its nothing like any other cryptocurrency

>kek
cpould I ask you why did you kek at that?
You don't believe in AI? Why not?

Its sole success relies on Ethereum. I can't believe you guys are holding a ERC20 shittoken. It does not even have its own chain nor network.

With a 3 trillion market cap i'd be worth 10k tho not 1k.

>why would any startup / growth company be worth investing in bigger companies can just copy them

You are very, very stupid my little friend

True true AI is not possible without real time data happening in the real world. Oracles make that possible.

Haven't you asked why AI sucks right now? \

Buy Chainlink. It is a step in the future of AI

It will be higher than BTCs ATH. 1,000,000,000 £ 2030

this kek