Red pill me on Anarcho Communism

What will it be like once its finally implemented over the entire world?

Attached: ANCOM.png (230x219, 4K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/SVi3-PrQ0pY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

go to Venezuela and see how great it works

it wont work because people are greedy and don't want to share. thats why regular communism uses the state to force people to share.

youtu.be/SVi3-PrQ0pY

But the people I speak to about this say its a certainty that our overlords will succumb to the power of Anarchy combined with communism user!

It cant be pure imagination! Everyone will just share their wealth out of the kindness of their hearts! The power of love overcomes all!

But seriously...
Why the hell is this even a thing? Do we have any ancoms here on Biz who can school me?

You won't find ancoms here because the ideology is an oxy moron. Communism requires a centralized all-powerful authoritarian class for the planned economy so there's no room for any anarchy. Ancaps are probably tarded too but at least their ideology isn't defeated by its own fucking name.

the people you talk to are fucking idiots. Find new frens

>ideology isn't defeated by its own fucking name.

Surely there is some angle I am just not thinking about!! I am being berated and dragged through the mud over this! I have nothing to defend myself as I struggle to understand how this obviously effective system can bring about world peace!!

HELP ANONS!

If just one person, under an ancom system, declines to share, it's not communism. If the collective forms an authority to seize that person's "fair share", it's not anarchy. Libertarian collectivism is logically impossible provided there's more than one human on earth.

So all that is needed is 100% for everyone to just stop being greedy. Sounds easy!

i have an lolanarchist friend who unironically believes this. people just need to come together and share everything maaaan and then everything will be gravy. disputes will somehow be sorted out without a police force and judges. and never mind that other nations/tribes/groups might step in and take all your shit because were living in fantasyland where such conflicts dont exist anymore. this is unironically what anarchists believe.

So since we have this topic which are more retarded. AnCaps or AnComs?

Both are so staggeringly retarded its hard to comprehend but which are more retarded?

Ancom is probably the absolute winner. I am just lost right now that it can even exist as a concept.

I don't know why you people think AnCap means no authority at all. It means no government.

Read The Conquest of Bread by Kropotkin

Dont spend time trying to make sense with retards

It is definitely a very strong contender however you have arguments like on the AnCap side which make me think AnCaps are more retarded because they think they are using logic.

>Born into an aristocratic land owning family
It's like pottery

This is going to be a backburner of a semantics gay orgy, but is not whatever authority that exists, assuming that it is comprised of more than one person, the defacto government, at least insofar as there's an absence of any higher authority than the one we're referencing?

Monopolies are bad. Government is a monopoly.
You need competition, a number of responsible parties can be used in place of a central government. You can call them small governments if it makes you feel better.

You are a retard is the problem. Like said this is just retarded semantics.

It would probably come circle into MinArchism anyway.
Say there are a number of private bodies competing to perform the roles that a government would usually do. The best one beats out the competition and you end with one body again, much like a government.

The difference is that this competition actually exists. Unlike under democracy.

No you're just too brain-dead to think about it hard enough.

AnComs are actually even more retarded than what you describe. It's not "disputes will be settled without a police force", it's more like "there will be no more disputes". They believe that with the elimination of class disparity, everyone (meaning everyone left alive after the revolution, which ideally for them would be the most dysgenic and incapable demographic) will share the same preference for perfect cooperation and brotherly love. It is the absolute zenith of retarded ideology. Only the most childish and stupid people actually believe this shit.

>AnCaps think they have it figured out and are geniuses but they follow they same retarded logic as AnComms

You literally just admitted that eventually there will be a monopoly which is exactly what happens everywhere and is the reason we have a single government. Because this group of people out-competed another group in the distant past. Its a logical fallacy that competition means better service when you can just kill the opposition or a thousand other things which doesn't involve your service being better.

Jesus Christ you people are stupid.