Quanties, give me a technical argument why your project is great

Just like ripple is "being adopted?

No spoon feeding for you. Just feed on Gilberts dick.

Because you have nothing.

XRP's 12 billion marketcap looks good to me. QNT would be $1200.

Because you are too stupid to research it yourself, instead, relying on fucking Jow Forums for a technical explanation to aid your financial decision making. Stay poor faggot.

google Gilly
find Remitt's twitter
check followers
enjoy 100x

Attached: GXh55cDIwWkiqNJyKUBNeg_r.jpg (750x500, 91K)

Attached: coffee.jpg (752x525, 42K)

No...seriously fuck off. Barclays are actual clients. Whats your game here?This isnt some fake incubator iota bmw shit. Quant will show and you can fuck off honestlye.

The ceo is the founder of the ISO for blockchain.

Attached: arnie.jpg (700x496, 68K)

How can any faggot actually argue with this? Im sure your project has just as good leadership. Lol

uk.linkedin.com/in/gverdian

Meanwhile Barclays is hosting hackathons in order to find a solution for interoperability. Because they openly state they dont want to be dependend on a coin or a token.

Still no bank partner.

link?

>erc20 token

fucking LOL

Clearmatics is the reason why QNT won't succeed. Deep connections and Vitalik is an Advisor, they are talking with the Big ones.
ledgerinsights.com/barclays-to-host-enterprise-blockchain-interoperability-hackathon/

Saved me time user. The circlejerk however will close eyes and fap themselves to sleep into a delussional dream of wealth and rise into the top 10.
Not happening.

Here is the problem, Quant is selling a product, not a service. Only service protocols are going to be valuable in terms of the token, especially if it has a store of value mechanism. Quant sounds like it might be a decent product like OS is for computers, but it's a product instead of a pay for service. Quant is better off just becoming a security token.

Why the hell would anybody even buy QNT? The token serves 0 purpose at the moment and they are not sure what they want/can use it for. The token was created for the company to gain funds. it serves no purpose past that. The only thing being that you may need QNT to "Access" the network at a later date which is still to be determined...

2019 and still thinking use case matters.

oh lawd

Any OMG bag holders here kek.

Umm, thats how you make money faggot

Wrong. They provide both product and servicing. Tailormade solutions with ongoing support.

>Umm, thats how you make money faggot

This is literally your first day in crypto, isn't it

Ok but having a token to pay for customer service is not going to work. Again it's a product instead of a protocol.

Except there isn’t a direct correlation between marketcap valuation and usage. Welcome to crypto

>Except there isn’t a direct correlation between marketcap valuation and usage. Welcome to crypto

In fact there's pretty much no correlation at all, duh. Gosh the FUD attempts are just pathetic these days.

Lol. The token must be held by enterprise clients and as far as we know usage levels will correlate with throughput. It will put massive pressure on the token.

Billion dollar enterprises will think nothing to pay a million bucks for licensing and holding the token. So much will be taken off the supply.

Now compare that with EOS with billions of tokens and zero usage.

"must be held" you know how i know you're a fucking faggot liar?

How do the economics of that work? You have to hold 1 million dollars worth of tokens or a certain amount of tokens to use the network?

Also, why would I pay for an OS when I'm already paying on-chain fees?

> arguing over whether the token has value
> token goes 20x in ETH
> still arguing over whether the token has value
> thinks that you can decide the value based on anything other than how the market is actually responding to it

You guys really should come into the community and actually man up and ask the CEO questions. And most of the answers are in the Blockchain Brad i interviews where Gil explains exactly why they do what they do and its based in 20 years in enterprise security not 2 years watching ivan on tech u silly faggots.

For one Gil said no enterprise can trust they legacy systems to one chain..its too risky. He actually had inside story on ripple failure at working with enterprise cause they were clueless.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=X5sNBxbFa1U

You're not gonna get much from this crowd, but here's a perspective:

Quant is not just some project that's tangential to ISO TC 307, its serving as the reference architecture for it. That means that 60+ countries are all working on defining what blockchains are, so that Overledger can use these taxonomic/ontological definitions to connect all chains. Much has yet to be revealed about how this will actually be implemented /whether this project is permissions or permission less, but, to put it simply, this is how it works:
-You have native node software of a given chain acting as a "gateway node." This node executes like any other node, but has some kind of wrapper/filter that it passes/receives blockchain messages through.

Each of these messages are hashed and tokenized into something called trusttags, these allow for continual awareness of components of blockchains (blocks, transactions, smart contracts, etc.) to be tracked continually throughout the Overledger.

-This feeds into a abstracted meta layer that filters and orders the data into a unified graph. You may ask whether or not such an architecture is vulnerable to eclipse attacks, but Gilbert has stated as a cybersecurity professional that they are aware of that vector and will be able to minimize it/help chains negate as well.

-It's then just a few easy steps until you have multi chain smart contracts, atomic swap capabilities, and oracle integration into blockchain ecosystems.

This is the Blockchain meta-standard. It allows for the arbitrary connection between multiple chains regardless of architecture at TCP/IP speeds. Chainlink is merely an application you can run through Overledger, not even a competitor.

(Picture sourced from AIOTI, H2020 initiative)

Attached: IMG_20190129_102640_840.jpg (1280x631, 81K)

Nice summary u should blog that and get it translated for the Chinese market.

m.youtube.com/watch?v=X5sNBxbFa1U

Personally i literally put half my stack into quant after watching this interview. Felt comfy ever since.

The 10.00 to 12.00 is pure gold Gil dissing pretty much all interoperbility projects and mocking Ripple at enterprise connecting. Big eye opener...

So if everything passes through their system, isn't that a centralized vulnerability to the system since it's not a system of nodes by a single software?

Do you think huge banks etc are crypto anarchists OR just want unhackable systems that can interface safely with their legacy systems and save them time and money?

The chains they connect to are dectralised doesnt mean companies want it.

Moved to different computer:

Not sure what you mean here, Overledger is literally just the metalayer. You can maintain it anyway you wish, centralized or not. You could even use Chainlink to build your views of multiple chains through Overledger if you really want to. Chainlink + Overledger comes the closest to Szabo's God Protocol, Polkadot notwithstanding.

Pic related is Acccenture's blockchain interoperability node being built upon Overledger gateways.

Attached: accenture_example.jpg (750x376, 33K)

Thanks JEFFERY, wen eat parasites.

They do if it's a security vulnerability.

I have to warn this thread too. This Quant shilling is just big stack linkies trying to get your little stacks for cheap.

Autist alarm:

Quant and Chainlink are bothers, with an Accord forged in the fires of the bear market.

I've been in LINK since he beginning, but Quant is bigger.

It's not centralized due to the node gateways.

Cmon man, everyone (almost everyone) knows that you own 0.0 quant tokens and you're 100% in chainlink. You don't have to lie to me fren.

Bruv, you have no idea. I'm telling you this project has potential that this board has only an inkling of. We've been just as autistic in digging for clues as to where and who Quant is in bed with. Just own both, you will make it.

ID checks out. kek

gilbertverdian.com/blog/ciso-of-the-year-2017/

GV was in charge of security for the UK Bank of England. He also held position at US Federal Reserve – Secure Payments Taskforce. Among others. I think he understands security.

gilbertverdian.com/cv/

Quant literally just got listed on Bittrex:

twitter.com/bittrexintl/status/1090310018723921926?s=12

Let's gooooooooo

polkadot will kill quant

funny joke

Holy shit. Nice.