Daily reminder to low IQ Chainlink bagholders
swift.com
itnewsafrica.com
>ChainLink PoC for Swift = Bond coupon Payments
>ChainLink PoC is NOT SWIFT gpi
>ChainLink PoC IS NOT Nostro reconciliation
>Mentions of ISO20022 do not relate to ChainLink - most likely - at all
I'm genuinely sorry.
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>there are people on this board who believed SWIFT would be using their ERC token
What the fuck, hahaha
How is GPI Link getting on/off-chain with any DLT exactly?
SWIFT’s PoC will include bank and corporate participants. A prototype will be demonstrated at Sibos in London in September 2019.
Chainlink will not be part of the event or have anything to do with the demonstration in question.
That isn't remotely an explanation => how?
>wearing pants
>there are people on this board who believed SWIFT would be using their ERC token
At the moment it seems they have found a way to do it without Chainlink and/or Chainlink token network.
I am sorry. If Chainlink was needed they would also be featured on Sibos 2019, but this is not the case, at the moment it seems, Chainlink is irrelevant fetching the off-chain data and connecting the blockchain to real world.
I am genuinely sorry I really wanted guys like this to make it but it is more than clear that SWIFT and Chainlink has parted ways.
do you realize that the FUD phase is over already?
you seem really desperate
>found a way to do it
=>
Damn thanks for the memes anons I guess the dream is over. I'm selling and will wait for the next revolution you autists dig up.
Why Chainlink is not participant at the SIBOS2019 even though many other blockchain companies have already been invited?
It just seems to me absurd that if Chainlink truly is essential piece to the blockchain/smart contracts connectivity and security like HTTPS/HTTP was to Internet, why is not Fintech interested in it? Why do many other blockchain based companies getting featured on Sibos 2019, but Chainlink isn't?
when did you sell? are you making profits right now?
going by how obstinated you are, you must be stressing alot.
we are not in 2018 anymore, alot of teams have announced their partnerships and their intentions towards chainlink, and now we own town crier, the FUD phase was between september 2017 and july 2018, starting from linktober everything changed, your swingy spacing doesn't work anymore
SmartContract had a PoC with SWIFT that was basically using smart contracts to make a bond payment on Hyperledger. In a sense, a rather mundane application of blockchain compared to some of the more exotic ideas you read about if you've been interested in crypto for a while.
This PoC used an oracle to get interest rates, i.e., "the smart oracle" that SmartContract references on their website, but keep in mind this oracle was not Chainlink if you actually would spend 5 minutes reading the demonstration.
Chainlink is a decentralized oracle network and company created after that that SWIFT has expressed no interest in, ever.
The team's exclusive focus at the moment appears to be on Ethereum (which SWIFT has expressed no interest in using, especially not on the public chain)
These are actual facts that nobody is denying, not FUDster or Shiller. This is the current state we are in.
Because it's a sketchy scam that is literally only recognized because of spam
This is still not an explanation for how GPI Link is getting on/off chain with any DLT, what is this API exactly?
SWIFT can settle in any currency via CL..
The only answer I can give you at the moment is that Chainlink will have nothing to do with it. I am sorry, I genuinely am.
Ahh now you're jumping the shark, I can't 100% prove they are using CL => how are you proving they are not?
you type like a fag and your posts are all retarded
I'm sorry.
You can screencap this posts etc. to remind yourself in 2021, but Chainlink and Swift have nothing to do with each other in the future.
Blockchain will be huge part of SWIFT payments in the future, but Chainlink will not be part of that equation, nor part of SIBOS conferences etc.
But its called swiftlink
O well that's part of the game. I am still going to hold a small stack of link. What picks do you recommend?
Look what they did to my baby !!!
So your saying this is the end of CL?
great movie
Read the latest comment to this tweet:
twitter.com
I really am sorry for most of you guys, especially the INTP/INTJ people who are hurt the most.
Seems that we need to ditch the SWIFT/Chainlink narrative, big money clearly is not interested in CL.
dude start writing in english I dont speak queer
Which Larper are you? Wellbeing-user?
oh gee, thanks for looking out for me :) guess ill sell all my LINK now. gues this fud really works what do you know? theres a reason these faggots sit here and fud all day, because it works!!!! t.sold everything.
Yeah you should be sorry you piece of fucking shit, continue lying like this and you might just get burned. Don't do this to your fellow linkies, karma is truly a bitch.
is this you? Are you a swingtrader?
>If Chainlink was needed they would also be featured on Sibos 2019
No they wouldn't.
Chainlink was featured in 2017, any further development would not require further Sibos attendance.
youtube.com
STAY STINKY
>Why Chainlink is not participant at the SIBOS2019
Because Chainlink already did a full presentation at Sibos 2017.
And Chainlink was the only external crypto to be invited to do a full presentation that year.
this user fucks.
>a rather mundane application of blockchain
No, a key example of what oracles do.
>This PoC used an oracle to get interest rates
>but keep in mind this oracle was not Chainlink
You retard.
See pic related, it's literally the Slide from Sergey's Sibos presentation.
Notice any specific logo that appears six (6) times in said slide?
>if you actually would spend 5 minutes reading the demonstration.
This line makes your retardation even more hilarious.
>why is not sir
>why do many but not link sir
Get off my 4channel.
hes obviously a fucking poorfag pajeet, wanting to 'ccumulate more, he doesn't want us to leave without him, deep down, he wants to be our fren, but he can't accept not being highly ranked
>neets bought chainlink, tested some nodes
>good, everything is tested, neets are caged by ICO price, crab-17 activated
>make another project using link tech
>whales actually invest
>neets get dumped with chainlink
shadowfork posters warned you about this long time ago. Jews don't want you to get rich.
Swift was never a chainlink partner. Sergey just paid a few crypto "news" outlet to mention Swift and chainlink together. There has never been a single mention of link on any Swift website.
The fat NEET scammed biz
*ahem*
Yes yes, very interesting. The standard affair.
I just have ONE question.
*stands over you*
>How does the R3 Corda Settler interact with off-chain information?
*takes a long drag*
*blows smoke in your face*
Tell me.
based and smokepilled
why do you try to sound so elaborate with your words, meanwhile they are straight from an article? Are you trying to seem like you have more information than anyone else? Oh wait, you are doing exactly that because you're trying to buy cheap. Kys.
BASED
Blah blah blah 1k eoy still
SWIFT needs Chainlink more than vice versa so this juvenile fud doesn't even get off the ground.
Probably still got a few handjobs out of it back at the discord, though.
Sorry sorry sorry shut the fuck up loser
When he says "the SWIFT gpi link", he's talking about a SWIFT plugin for Chainlink, this is how Chainlink work you retard(or fudding faggot), it is the connector, connecting off chain(ledger) data to on chain data.
So, yes, SWIFT is using Chainlink, and so is everyone else.
based and nopants
So all your last tweet says was you found evidence that they weren't involved with gpi, but just bond coupon payments, yet literally posted no proof. No one is selling just kys
>SWIFT needs Chainlink
hahahahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHA
the irony is nobody not even those people that use chainlink need chainlink itself, what they need are the apis on the other end, something any decentralized oracle provider, or the api itself, can provide.
chainlink manages to capture no value itself
IT IS THE FUCKING NETWORK THAT CONNECTS THE ORACLES WRITTEN FOR INTEROPERABILITY WITH THE LINK NETWORK REEEEEEE
>when you eating cheese
and yet for an api to be compatible with chainlink it must be compatible with all middleman networks, or its validity can't be verified, unless it is offered directly by the api itself, without any third party.
Based and cheesepilled
Like ships on the ganges passing in the night.
Swift = US dollar
US dollar will be fucked in 10 years. Screen cap this lads
Even if this whole Swift not using Chainlink is true, smart contracts still need to be able to access off chain data, and Chainlink is the best project for that usecase.
No, it actually only has to be compatible with chainlink, retard
You’re clearly looking for some kind of comfort in your investment: it doesn’t exist faggot. There is no investment with large reward that doesn’t come with a huge risk. Yes, ChainLink May be a project that fails, that’s why you may be rewarded for investing early if it succeeds. Quit being a faggot, this same thread and all your concerns have been addressed in multiple threads.
Does anybody give a fuck about this morons opinion? I don't.
You are going to feel pretty fucking dumb relatively soon. Newsflash, Swift is Link, Link is Swift.
sergipilled
Fucking bump.
Link holders are the worst
Used to keep talking about swift.
Now swift rejects them.
Well, swift doesn't matter.
Going to 0.
Sir Gay even had a previous exit scam, NXT.
Fool me once shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
Cant spell Swift without Link
Nostro PoC was "replace GPI with blockchain", proved to be expensive with no real benefit after the switch. This is from the CEO of SWIFT.
bond payment PoC was "connect GPI to blockchain". they haven't declared it a failure yet and the silence is rather deafening. They are expanding smartcont.coms roll in messaging.
But they are showibg the results of tgeir swift link gpi poc. If chainlink was involved wouldn't it make sense to invite chainlink or sergey to the conference as well.
Why is there another low level tier LINK FUD thread here? Are you guys so bored? Is OP Craig Fakamoto being drunk and bored again? I'm starting to like you Craig kun.
Who the fuck ever said that LINK was there to process paynents? That would be retarded as duck. Quack! Bond payment and other smart contracty pee pee poo poo stuff are the goal. It is litteraly written in the stars. Look at the sky user. FUCKING LOOK AT IT!!! Now tell me. Can you see it? Can you see LINK's price EOY? Aren't we all in this together??? Is the upcoming 0.6 means that the development is only at 60%? When will I be able to say FUCK to any boss and become a self-sustained, ball sucked, happy autistic NEET? When????
WELL I'M BORED TOO BUT HERE WE ARE
But they are showing the results of their swift link gpi poc. If chainlink was involved wouldn't it make sense to invite chainlink or sergey to the conference as well.
>If chainlink was involved wouldn't it make sense to invite chainlink or sergey to the conference as well.
If Swift was going to invite every single contributor to their accrued and compounded know-how and processes, they'd have to host Sibos in an evacuated city.
Checked.
I have 10k linkies....am i making it or not make up your dang mind user give it to me straight
Actual smart contract employee here, we are more on the consulting side for swift than a product supplier. They won’t be using our product but they are being consulted for automation processes. All I can say
Based and smokepilled and almost timepilled
Guys my dad works at swift. I asked him about chainlink and he didn’t have any idea what I was talking about.
You sound like a retard. Swift chooses the topics. They are still building their swift gpi link. It makes sense to showcase new tech they are building at sibos. If it really was chainlink then chainlink would be showing off their work with swift. It would make perfect sense for a solution which is proposed to save banks hundreds of billions every year. How many other fucking sibos presentations are going to save swift hundreds of billions every year? If the swift link gpi was all thanks to Sergey they at least owe that invite to him.
>If it really was chainlink
If what really was chainlink?
Guys, can you smell it?
Its the smell of fear
Fear of missing out
I have not smelled fear like this since the end of 207
Do you really think a CEO would conduct business presentations in a tatty flannel shirt and tracksuit pants if he was at all worried about the possibility of failure?
> end of 207
LOL
end of the roman empire?