Chainlink > Literally a meme team, sirgay and who else? >1 billion supply reducing the possible ROI you can get. > 650mil tokens locked up, isn't that a big enough red flag? > literally 100% truthfully only talked about so much because of memes and hype. > oracle problem solved by dApps on iExec anyway (websensors)
iExec > 80mil supply, comfy supply for invesment, cause lets face it if the coin economics aren't up to scratch, its not a worthy investment > literally a team of experts who have been researching and studying cloud computing since its inception 20 years ago > LITERALLY solves the oracle problem medium.com/iex-ec/dapp-of-the-week-03-websensors-70dc9c333e83 > Complex computation tasks will NEED to be taken off chain to be processed and then sent back on chain for verification, cause as we all know you cant even run a simple connect4 game on ethereum >LITERALLY a member of the ethereum enterprise alliance, working with IBM, INTEL, Huawai etc
You do the maths, I mean, invest in chainlink IF YOU WANT, but I think it'll be the worst financial decision you ever make.
>iExecubot pops out of my backpack >iExecubot uses vacuum on the smoke to prevent me from breathing it >iExecubot focuses target on you >iExecubot stabs you to death >iExecubot returns to my backpack >iExecubot confirms bodyguard.exe ran successfully with PoCo >you lie there on the ground and your last words are "my stinky linky stays 0$ EOY"
>Uses chainlink to get attention >has no threads for months then has a ton of threads out of nowhere How you know something is inorganic on biz 101
Luis Anderson
Please, pretty pretty pretty please, tell me you're joking.
Jose Gomez
you need to ensure the coin can grow, obviously...
I aim for investing in coins under a 100 Mill cap as this guarantees each coin can reach a healthy amount of growth..... A total circulation gives you an indication of what values each individual coin can reach:
Coin A: 1 Billion Coins | Market Cap 100 Million = $0.10
Coin B: 100 Million Coins | Market Cap 100 Million = $1
Now whilst both are as popular as each other, due to the sheer cap with coin A, the price is 10x less than coin B. Therefore it is often very unrealistic to get dollar plus value through a currency with over a billion coins in circulation.
in fact hang on I don't even know why im explaining this, people on biz are just way too retarded
Ryder Kelly
getting sick of you retards.
if there's a token that has a 10 billion supply and there's a token that has a 10 million supply, suppose that they do exactly the same thing in terms of project, it's exactly the same thing, a 100% copy cat, just a different name and token. Which token do you think will be the more valuable?
Do you think its the 10 billion token coin? then you are retarded cause the more tokens there are, the more potential holders, the more it can dump.
do you think it's the 10 million coin? then you actually have a brain and understand market psychology
do you think it's neither because its the same tech and just the token name is different? you were nearly a non brainlet, but still a brainlet.
Justin Morris
Scenario 1: >buy 2 tokens for $500 total >after a week you double your money
Scenario 2: >buy 200 tokens for $500 total >after a week you double your money
Now tell me what the difference is.
William Flores
> you fall in the still a brainlet camp. but atleast you tried.
According to your logic, Elastos ($2.15) is "more valuable" than Ripple ($0.3).
Benjamin Walker
So this is the link whales last fud before the singularity. Careful not to fall for it.
Dylan Green
>if you cut a pizza into 8 slices you have more pizza than if you cut the same pizza into 4 slices
Brayden Anderson
marketcap and coin fundamentals are all that matter RLC's marketcap is extremely low in comparison to its supply and price. therefore, RLC is highly undervalued for the potential value it holds therefore, buying RLC is the best play in crypto right now. therefore, 250$ EOY GO FUCK YOURSELF NOW GET OUT OF MY OFFICE
None of what you said is relevant to the discussion I'm having with OP and the purple ID retard.
James James
ok stay poor faggot
Nicholas Reed
if you put ripple and valuable in one sentence there's nothing to explain. You don't have the mental capacity to understand and I'm just wasting my time with yet another brainlet.
Jaxson Bell
19.5m mcap, most undervalued token in the entire market.
V3 is coming
Adam Cox
why would normalfags buy into this
Evan Jackson
> decentralized cloud computing that will take on Amazon AWS.
there, easy.
Carson Morgan
why do they need this
Samuel Morgan
Suppose you invest $1,000
Scenario 1: >buy 100 tokens at $10 >token price goes to $20 You turned $1,000 into $2,000
Scenario 2: >buy 10 tokens at $100 >token price goes to $200 You turned $1,000 into $2,000
What is the difference?
Eli Morris
because it's like investing in google, ibm, or intel or some other tech company that eventually rules the world. If it can fight these centralized companies (because the cost of using iExec will be much less due to the worldwide marketplace) it will be life changing.
Jose Smith
why would they need to buy 100 tokens
Alexander Phillips
maybe they want to run some sort of dapp? we don't know what amazing dapps will surface over the next few years. Could be insane with gpu support.
The thing is, they'll most likely be using iExec without even knowing it.
Brandon Gonzalez
Even the OP admits RLC's tokenomics are shit.
Sebastian Clark
good thing a tokenomics report is this year so you faggots stfu about MUH TOKENOMICS already. shit has staking and other reasons velocity will slow down over time. It's gonna fucking moon.
Luis Allen
>you faggots stfu about MUH TOKENOMICS already By "you faggots" you mean RLC fanbois like OP too, right?
Nolan Young
human psychology interferes. there's more potential for people to dump a coin where there's a 100 billion supply, simply because there can be more holders.
especially with how prices increase in the crypto markets.
whaty ou said doesn't matter at all.
the scarce item will always be more valuable than the non scarce item no matter if the tech is exactly the same. because of psychology and how humans behave.
owning something where there's less of them is just more attractive than owning something where there's a lot of them.
Grayson Ross
>human psychology interferes You mean how human psychology naturally prefers assets that have a lower price because they seem cheaper?
Nathan Reyes
nobody will buy tokens if they don't have to, either they'd have to sell computation power through tokens or else it's a fail
Jordan Jackson
yes indeed. that's true also, but only up until a certain point, and only brainlets buy for this reason, no brainlets are left in the market right now, so investing based on that principle would not be wise.
Luke Cox
>there's more potential for people to dump a coin where there's a 100 billion supply, simply because there can be more holders. You do realize RLC is an ERC20 token right? Divisible to 18 decimals?
Brandon Walker
You are an idiot who thinks slicing a pizza into 8 slices magically gives you more pizza than slicing it into 4 slices.
Andrew Turner
Yes. I know this. it's also blockchain agnostic.
Jacob Garcia
>Yes. I know this. Then you realize how dumb you sound when you say shit like "hurrr there can be more holders".
Luis Rodriguez
stop making assumptions, we aren't slicing pizza here this is the crypto market.
Ryan Price
that's besides the point. I said an item that is scarce is more valuable than an item that is not.
ERC20's having a big divider has nothing to do with this.
Last reply
Jacob Powell
OP doesn't know enough to talk about the tokenomics, clearly. Most people can't tell you much about the tokenomics because it's extremely complex.
>I said an item that is scarce is more valuable than an item that is not. Scarcity is not a factor when there are 86,999,785,000,000,000,000,000,000 items to go around.
Anthony Peterson
>Most people can't tell you much about the tokenomics because it's extremely complex. … and that's a good thing. Surely. R-right?
Ethan Foster
you can't buy 0.000000777 RLC on any markets so your point doesn't matter at all.
Luke Martinez
Normans don't need to understand tokenomics. Don't buy RLC if you can't DYOR and understand why we're all talking about it now.
Juan Nelson
If the price gets high enough, you bet your ass you'll be able to buy 0.000000777. Tardboy.
Cooper Thomas
>we're all talking about it now. See
Xavier Kelly
Here we are. Kek
Ryan Roberts
>implying I haven't been solely shilling RLC for months, and just recently upped my game on how to shill it so now everyone is a RLCommando
Don't buy it, we don't want you. Unless you DYOR, then come back to us.
No. It has nothing to do with it being organic. If anything it's ultra organic due to there being zero shills besides a handful of us doing it here and there, to now there's tens of people doing it at all times of the day.
If only you could get outside of your ignorant head and realize WHY people are shilling it, maybe you wouldn't be a poor wagecuck.
Gabriel Sanders
> It has nothing to do with it being organic inorganic*
Landon Gutierrez
5K RLC is like bagholding 25K LINK.Think about that for a second. Remember you only need 10K Link to make it.
Honestly I'm investing in the iexec team, it's one of the few alt coins with people who actually know what the fuck they are doing. I would probably invest in Chainlink but I just cant see Sergey pulling it off.
Tokeneconomics report will come in february if im not mistaken.
Cameron Bailey
why did you plebs take so long to realise?
William Richardson
i found out i am absolutely shit at stocks, i cant even make fucking meme lines to get 50% of my guesses right. i lost like 1k and have 2k more. i currently have 6k rlc at 666 sat, i am thinking about just letting it sit on binance and close all crypto tabs, then recheck in a few months.
what dates should i check in to see the price spike so i can maybe do 1 or 2 swing trades? also where do i start to get good at meme lines?
