BTC - digital currency ETH - trustless computing LINK - trustless data fetching
and I'm not sure about the first. Anything else is a worthless token that could be removed from the project entirely (FUN, RLC, REQ) or a competitor for laggards that missed the first moon and can't cope(Nano, XRP, EOS). If your portfolio has something other than these 3 it is garbage, sell it and move it into one of these.
Can we get a hate nano thread going? Haven't laughed in a while.
Jaxson Long
but it's RLS the trustless computing
Easton Miller
You're 66% correct and 33% pajeet.
Jace Bailey
Exchange tokens also matter.
Daniel Hughes
true but i have useless things in my portfolio such as QNT RLC and HOT to take the gains to buy more link and eth.
Grayson Carter
RLC is trustless computing retard
Evan Morgan
What brainlets dont understand is that when ETH scales and becomes cheap the market for trustless computing will shrink as more computations can be done on chain
Oliver Clark
>digital currency >trustless computing >trustless data fetching
I seriously hope ya’ll fags are just in it for the get rich quick scheme and don’t actually care about what normalfaggots are going to do with shitcoins.
Juan Green
>ETH >trustless computing sure, hopefully they figure it out _soon_
or just go with what sergey has in mind and do off chain computing with celer + tc
Easton Russell
Normals are point 1 only 2 and 3 and enterprise, which means profit
Sounds like a plan, all the eggs in one basket What, could, possibly, go, wrong
Jackson Taylor
can you elaborate on that
it seems like chainlink one way or another makes make rlc and 99% of shitcoins redundant, but why is everyone stuck on rlc then?
rlc+req+link was the holy trinity last year req dead, rlc not as dead.. is there a new wave of newfags finding rlc here?
Xavier Long
You must work with shit tier enterprises
Luke Cox
I’m not saying normalfag = bad.
Jaxson Fisher
nothing can go wrong because craig is a genius with patents and he is satoshi link will moon but btc goes to 1k and eth to $15
Gavin Jones
Holochads laugh and rejoice
Kayden Rogers
>BTC - digital currency top kek
Lucas Russell
I agree with OP. A lot of ppl saying that RLC is legit but why the fuck does it need a token for it to work, the answer is that it does not. How can you be so ignorant as to not ask the question that if you're investing in a seemingly great project that is the token even necessary
it makes no sense to run everything on chain, why not just calculate whatever that you need offchain and log the results on eth?
Celer + tc makes all chains scale through offchain computing with chainlink nodes as the gateway. Once it is possible to make all chains scale and usable, polkadot will come in handy and allow devs to build applications that uses the features of various blockchain like lego sets
Dominic Hughes
LINK is more than data fetching, OP.
That might have been your selling poin but others know where the value in this network is through owning a piece of the network which serves as the information highly between offchain info and the blockchain world. Chainlink inherently adds value to all blockchain developers as we'll be able to charge our clients even more.
We have the key to allow them to automate a full business, or at least a great deal of their operational management (when designed well).
Colton Thomas
>There are only 3 coins that matter been syaing this for over a year now. anyone on /biz not all in on LINK needs their head checking.
Kayden Cook
>BTC - digital currency
nope, merely a token, a meme
>ETH - trustless computing
bullshit. No one need this. JPMorgan forked the crap in order to have its own *token*, not any fucking compute
>LINK - trustless data fetching
does not exist, will never work due to violation of fundamental principles of economics - supply and demand.
there is literally no demand for any of this bullshit