>Chainlink wont start on Windows
And Linkies think MN is soon.
Absolute state of LINK
> knowing this little about code
Your posts aren't even leddit tier. They're myspace boomer tier. Go the fuck back.
>staking and running a node on a virus plagued system. Kek
Linktards will defend this.
You ok fren?
It's sad enough believing in it when nothing was delivered but still believing after they tried and failed is just... Christ almighty.
If anything, this is bullish because it means it's finished and they are now porting it to Windows for mass adoption from normans.
The fact that they're even bothering with Windows is bullish. It means they're trying to lower the barrier for entry as a node operator.
Why would they even fucking bother with a windows version? What servers run windows for any reason?
Why would they even try to make Windows a viable option for a chainlink node?
(You) need help
>running serious shit on windows
Get linux nigga
Both is even better.
Everybody here forgets that Steve & co are building the fucking INDUSTRY STANDARD on blockchain API middleware and that means that chainlink must run/build when underwater, when your CPU is bursting flames, when there is no more power and yes, even on windows.
The whole thing that is beautiful with chainlink is if you haven't worked at big companies in data/cloud/BI/devops or whatever and comprehend how this shit will unlock blockchain registry potential for businesses you can't see the difference between Chainlink and another shitcoin.
God speed anons, and remember, buy mobius
what's a myspace?
Rather they focus on relevant shit
Who the fuck runs Windows for something that needs uptime?
This is literally nothing.
Only brainlets would try this shit
usually big corps use windows server
U know nothing.
Now go stand in the corner , your on a time out kid.
>usually big corps use windows server
It’s literally the exact opposite. Small corps use windows server, big corps use big boy OS’s like CentOS
The winserver user is right you fucktards, doesnt mean its good, but its true
Fucking cringe.
It's the exact opposite.
Dont matter because LINK is vaporware and if its successful then its a Security. Either way Biz is assfucked
I'll let them know how you feel.
>t. Americuck
Big corps usually use both for different purposes. It's not often that you search for tech that fits the server OS, but server OS that fits the tech. Get what I mean? Regardless, for an up and coming project it's best that it works on as many systems as possible to make it appealing to devs.
this
>Why would they even try to make Windows a viable option for a chainlink node?
for normies to stake the 1 LINK they bought for $500 on their laptops