Watch it...WATCH IT

youtube.com/watch?time_continue=74&v=LtppATxVYvA

Watch it...WATCH IT

Attached: 1549520582475.jpg (2000x1372, 478K)

But but ... anons told me this was just another fake partnership ...

''What is Intel Doing?

Intel is working with blockchain developers such as iExec to develop a common way to connect blockchains to compute resources, including the servers that are typically used to connect IoT sensors. Using the TC API to allow compute resources to be registered with a blockchain for discovery by a submitted task, the results of the task are delivered to the requester, and a receipt is recorded on the blockchain to signal completion to the rest of the network.''

In that single video there's a lot more work shown than any other shitcoin project out there. Still don't belive why it's sub 30 rank.

and there are people here who literally still religiously hold link

It will change, trust me

2k baglet reporting in, I hope to at least reach 10k soon.

Attached: D62C7B5C-946B-4B46-A3B1-89BB9BCB40A9.png (617x499, 90K)

ChainLink.

All in this or Blockmesh?

what's your sat buyin targets? i have only 1000 and contemplating getting more

I unironically just went all in, witness me Anons

Attached: 1528423883320.gif (440x304, 798K)

you guys told me iExec was a shitcoin

WHAT THE FUCK

Attached: 1551283267159.png (500x488, 235K)

Why not both?

WITNESSED

Attached: 1551242987477.png (1920x1080, 794K)

you'll never beat the market if you don't come up with your own opinion user

Ho ho hoo, let me introduce you my newly learned stand.
>Intel 5G

Attached: The_World_DIO.png (540x694, 643K)

Well by looking at its daily charts it seems to have not gone below 8k sats in about a week so id say buying around there when it is in a dip is a good target. Plus v3 coming in may could bring in some nice gains.

>cropped a map with hand-drawn green dots and text, onto the chart area of a trading interface
>Intel SGX
SGX is known not to be a reliable solution to data privacy as data can always be extracted from it at the time of usage/decryption. SGX is meant to be an added layer of obfuscation at best. Man, even Sergey knows this - he's been grilled on it in talks before and owns up to it being insecure every time - it does NOT protect your data entirely from the hardware owner.

pic related

Attached: capture.jpg (1292x667, 119K)

Computing power will be the next Oil

IBM is with stellar you pajeet kike chink nigger faggot spic

Attached: 0CDF4283-DCEC-4B5D-B40E-1B76F81E7F59.gif (1286x800, 388K)

and that's a good thing