Every stupid cunt on Jow Forums thinks that his chink shitscam bag is the next Antshares when in fact the most bullish...

Why are you so angry and emotional? If you remove all the swear words from your text, there isnt much left. Quant has 1 app.

It says "Quant developed mapp" you autist. Not mApps in general. Quant is about an Overledger ecosystem where enterprise and devs are building their own mApps and systems on Overledger. I wouldn't expect Quant to directly build many mApps of its own.

But Go Verify apparently has this according to the AMA:

>> we're progressing a very large client to potentially use GoVerify covering all of the UK.

So even one of their few Quant-developed mApps are heading towards BTFO'ing 99.9% of dapps already out there.

I would not be surprised at all if Quant ends up being the major moon mission of 2019. Everything is lining up that way.

>Like it's for trading coins from one chain to another, but isn't that what an exchange is for?

Blockchain 101 first and then join the community. With the way you asked that question you don't even deserve to see the evolution of crypto, let alone get rich off it

OK sounds reasonable. You should keep the OP on a tight leash, he sounds a bit temperamental and crazy.

>a very large client
Yes and how many times has that been said before? Still waiting for that big bank announcement since last September was it?

Sorry dude but how the fuck can you buy and sell tokens when you have no idea what they do or what the system does?

Overledger is a middle-layer that provides huge blockchain-to-blockchain interoperability, but also the ability to create multi-chain apps, so enterprises can have systems that use multiple blockchains at the same time and leverages the best features of each.

For example, a mApp could use Bitcoin for data storage, Ripple for data speed and Ethereum for transactions. Three different blockchains working together for the one multi-chain app.

This adds HUGE redundancy and flexibility, and Quant have made Overledger incredibly easy to use. That handles all the complex back-end work while enterprises just connect their existing systems to it with a few lines of code. Patented tech as well.

It ticks all the boxes and removes so many barriers for mainstream enterprise adoption, so I have no doubt that 2019 is going to be a huge year with what's in the pipeline.

How many times has a project been created by the founder of the ISO standard for blockchain, an ex CISO of the year, a guy with proven work at the EU commission, and a guy with a huge resume in banks and governments?

It's simple. If you want the biggest gains you need to buy in early before rumours become facts. And if there's any CEO in crypto I'd trust based on the credentials, It's Gil.

OK thanks Im gonna add to my stack.

Now is a really good entry guys. I'm buying in this range.

Well they've already added JP Morgan's Quorum chain to the over ledger so that's a pretty fucking big giveaway.

Wait for the dump user

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-02-28 at 12.48.01.jpg (1200x879, 116K)

It's not even a blockchain you dumbfuck. You're speculating on an ERC20 token that isn't tied to shit.

>it already did a 15x from the bottom.
>guys it's gonna moon even more.
Not buying your bags Ranjeet.

JP Morgan have also said that Quorum is going to have full interoperability with other blockchains. Considering Overledger's tech is patented, they've either came up with something completely new, or they've sought out a partner to make it happen for them...

Can you explain to me again why I need this shit rather than just writing a bunch of API calls myself?

Go for it. Try getting people to use it. Do an ico. See how you get on.

The exact same reason why in the real world, corporations don't do absolutely everything themselves and often purchase and use many other platforms, services and systems.

Oh, and the tech is patented, so they couldn't even if they wanted to.

This Jew is using his ISO clout to pump his scam shitcoin on autistic Jow Forums NEETs. There is literally no reason why Quant should have a token for their services.

There is, actually. Wallets and tokens will be used as part of the cryptographic verification process when it comes to Overledger data transfer.

In fact, this is exactly what blockchain is fucking for. It's immutable and trustless, and therefore the perfect system to integrate to help sign and validate data.

Saying there's no need for Quant to have a token is like saying "there's no need for anyone to use blockchain". Just because you don't HAVE to use it, it doesn't mean it can't be used for the benefits it brings.

The fact is the tokenomics are being constructed to utilise QNT and directly increase the value of it relevant to Overledger adoption. QNT won't even need speculative pajeet buys.

Fine. I'll do a POC with a docker container. Will post the link later this week (I don't need a ICO this shit is like 8 hours of coding)...

I'm sure while Gilbert is using his contracts and credentials to get all these C-level enterprise meetings the big corps will also be eager to hear from some basement dwelling neet that he's created the same thing.

The absolute state of biz.

Well actually, Shilbert said he wanted the community to become developers. So theres that.

Gilbert was a CISO. They usually have zero connections outside of the security circle (speaking from experience here). The people inside the circle know this project is full of crap and couldn't care less.

>Muh Oracle partnership
Literally unpaid intern program
>Muh pay.uk guarantor
Doesn't mean shit but get hyped like crazy.

I'm guessing the March announcement of an announcement will be something stupid like leaving a folder near the EU in Brussel as well.

Furthermore, if QNT is to become a top 10 coin like some of you suggest, its imperative that apps are made by not only by muh big banks but also by the basement dwellers, so get off your high horse.

By the way Suppoman just shilled QNT and your favorite LTO on his latest video. Also mentioned UBT and said it was shit, kek.

I didn't know what it was and I made money because I was lucky.
So fucking sue me.
This has always been advanced internet gambling.

>bitcoin for data storage
>ripple for data speed
what the fuck are you actually on about?
Anybody with a fucking couple programmers can make in house apps that call out to these blockchains.
If they don't want an inhouse program doing it, they can use Chainlink.

goddamn it's worse than I thought.

You aren't speaking from experience though user, are you? You're a basement dweller. You have zero business or enterprise experience. It's an obvious fact.

Gil says he has 70+ deals in the pipeline, and of course there are the other major announcements to come. They also spoke with JP Morgan to create a Quorum connector. Either he's right, or you are.

The fact you think you can re-create Overledger, which has been in production for years, with 8 hours of coding, makes me lean towards trusting Gil and his team more than you. No offense.

Here's the thing that none of the shills mention. Getting it on chain isn't that hard. Modifying legacy systems that all major corporations (COBOL anyone?) use is the real pain the ass. What's Gilbert's solution to this? Sending an engineer that gets paid in tokens?

If course you think I'm a basement dweller. I'm on Jow Forums so would you think otherwise. I do know a thing about all these things Gilbert is talking about and I recognize bullshit when I hear it.

Look at their website and the generic language it uses to describe their "project". They. Have. Nothing. Their whole so called SDK is a bunch of comments and generic functions. DYOR

You haven't done even the slightest bit of research, have you?

This is one of the biggest parts of Overledger. One Gilbert frequently mentions. They've designed it to make it incredibly easy to connect and use without ANY legacy system modifications.

Have you not heard the "four lines of code" thing? Yes it's a marketing gimmick but that is a crucial thing they're aiming for. They understand that a huge barrier to blockchain is the cost, time and risk of pairing legacy systems to it. Overledger has removed that barrier in one swoop.

The guy has spent 20+ years in high-level enterprise. You can tell. He knows exactly what enterprise wants and he's delivering it while all the bedroom autists are claiming that it's not what enterprise wants despite having absolutely no knowledge or experience in it at all.

The idea behind your greentext is the exogenous hardware/network security/latency profiles reality imposes on software, can be 'overcome' by parallelization. Not needing to bootstrap a new networked hardware for a new coin which combines what n coins already excel at.

Seriously. You're the one who aren't getting it. YOU WILL HAVE TO CHANGE CODE IF YOU WANT TO INTEGRATE ANYTHING. You cant just magically spit out properly formatted data to the 'Overledger'. You'll have to feed it (properly formatted) data. You can't just tell a COBOL payment system (the shit all big banks still use) to magically use some cloud service (not to mention most big corporations are hesitant to put this shit in the cloud in the first place because of compliance).

Actually its 3 lines of code. Looks like you need to DYOR yourself, kek

Very bullish for chainlink.

Wrong. That's the point of Overledger. It's a MIDDLE LAYER. Overledger does all the heavy lifting in terms of data transfer between blockchains etc while for the enterprise user it's considerably easier to plug their existing systems in.

Yes, there may need to be some basic coding on their end to tie up any loose ends, but they don't have to fundamentally change their existing legacy system. That's the whole point.

Do you not think a guy with 20+ years of C-level experience in banks and governments, and an ex-CISO of the year, understands COBOL and the implications of it in terms of enterprise DLT adoption?

It shows the level of autistic delusion on this board when NEETs who've achieved absolutely nothing think they've found such easy flaws that a team with huge corporate, banking and cybersecurity backgrounds have missed.

1) A CISO is not actually a C-level. It's on par with a Privacy Officer or other senior IT management.
2) A CISO knows shit about how those systems work.
3) So what is it? Do I need to change or do I not need to change anything?
4) You never addressed the Privacy concerns with putting PII on multiple public ledgers. Ever heard about the GDPR?

Also you're getting a bit angry there user. Are you sure you know what you're talking about?

>It shows the level of autistic delusion on this board

Again get off your high horse. Youre on this board arent you? Same like the OP who was calling everyone on here cunts. Basically calling yourselves autistic cunts. Nice one. Oh and remember its "3 lines of code" not 4.

1..2...3....4

No wait...

1...2...3

first time I heard about this project. wew, this is a no brainer. Wish I had more money to put in. =/

>> Not C-level.

Chief Information Security Officer. The clue is in the first word.

But I understand now. You mentioned GDPR. This immediately identifies you as an LTO bagholder. One of many LTO bagholders who fail to understand that you can easily store encrypted private data on public ledgers and even verify it on-chain while keeping it private, such as with hash verification - therefore making GDPR completely irrelevant in the vast majority of cases.

Not to mention the fact there's a huge world of data out there that isn't PII and would fall outside the remit of GDPR even if it weren't possible to do the above, which it is.

The FUD is getting worse, and worse and worse. If we've got to the level where people are claiming that Overledger won't work because of GDPR, then QNT is set for a very good 2019.

Notice how I never chilled another coin. GDPR is a big thing and we deal with it daily. You mention hash verification and if you even had the slightest clue what you were talking about you know a hash is one way only. Good luck transferring data that way. Don't you mean encryption?

You act like you know your stuff but you can't even distinguish between those two basic things. Seriously this is like InfoSec 101...

you do not need acoin for chain interoperability. all you need is a working protocol. this is so fucking stupid. it is going to evaporate right before your very eyes. sell this shit before it is too late

I wonder how JPM is managing to bridge to every only projects that QNT has bridges to...
I wonder who QNT's major US banking partner is...

how much to retire?

I love all of the FUD while we pump. Nothing going on here.