This simple image reveals why BTC will go above $100k.
Biz will never understand this, and this is why biz will never make it
>implying it's even higher than 1
holy fuck stupid cuck so you read about the nigger ratio today and suddenly you think you're some kind of financial guru go kys stupid larper
Explain for brainless
if you are brainless then you wont understand the explaination, checkmate atheist
500IQ aint ya
Kek fucking this. OP you don't seem to understand what Sharpe ratio is/implies.
M..my sharpe ratio is fucking -0.38
W..will I makeitâ„¢ fren ?
I have a managed portrolio with some investment firm.
t. Brainlet
Sharpe ratio is a bit of a meme, espeically when you only have a small sample size. The number you should be the most concerned with is the expense ratio of the fund. The average funds underperforms the market (risk adjusted) so keeping the costs as low as possible is very important.
Thanks fren.
I guess faith in God is my way to go since I don't understand shit.
btc doesn't have much history so there isn't enough data to calculate a proper sharpe ratio
it true
me have been trying for understand sharpee for like 2 years now and still dont
It already has 10 years of history.
not enough
Why would anyone give a fuck about upside volatility? Also volatility isn't risk, CAPM is shit so you can fuck off with that debunked boomer shit
Sharpe ratio assumes asset movement follows the gausasian distribution. It doesnt. Sharpe ratio is for idiots.
>gausasian distribution
Actually it's not too far off just with fat tails.
The historic beta of BTC is far from as large as most people (including OP) seem to think. Most of the risk is (probably) unystematic.
Take your time my dear.
Sortino ratio
I prefer the biz sharpie ratio.