Chainlink mainnet will not be next week

All the money in the world converted to muh link tokenz one day after le mayyynnetzz launch. Dankiest of comfy feels muh ni66a.

I cant believe I still come here
OK
ETHCC will have Link be the designated oracle for polkadot
In April the first uses of what you call mainnet will be live; this is because some projects which absolutely need on chain crypto and real world asset prices are confident enough to use essentially centralized feeds over chainlink given that those feeds will be from trusted data providers (lookup the nodary service from chainlink consulting group)
Those will be the nodes most in demand before payment APIs are integrated; once those are up and running smoothly linkpool will let all the neets to get ready with their neet nodes
Hence the may-aug window for "real" mainnet
But the cherry on top won't come until the end of 2019: remember how this all started. The reason anyone cares about chainlink is SWIFT, full stop.

Why did the most powerful banking collective bankroll sergey and back link? Because they're so nice? I know you all are fucking retarded and won't get it so here it is: SWIFT is how establishment banks comply with PSD2 and, instead of getting their lunch eaten, make MORE money.

Oh, you're an ambitious startup that needs access to our customers balances? we've mad our data fully available through the industry-standard, trusted, decentralized Chainlink network, you're free to access them there at any time. And just in time to meet the regulations of PSD2.

What's that? You're upset that each access costs more than you have allocated for such transactions and now you can't compete? Well that's just a shame. I mean we did have LINK available for over a year at less than a dollar. Why didn't you buy then? And you're mad that we hold 30% of the supply? Why wouldn't we? Look at what a fine investment it has been, friend.

Screencap or pasta this or whatever. You're all too fucking dumb to even understand what is above. I hope the next generation of lonely introverts feeling pol/b/fit are smarter than you idiots.

I don't get the hint.
Thanks for advice though. Will swingtrade the announcement.

WillI I make it with 21k

Thanks for spoonfeed.

Attached: cat.png (284x284, 28K)

There is no Chainlink roadmap
This is not FUD, it is a simple fact.

Hitler was right
This is not FUD, it is a simple fact

Will 100k make it? How much?

thanks user

10 million
2 million

How long?

I cant believe I still come here
OK
ETHCC will have Link be the designated oracle for polkadot
In April the first uses of what you call mainnet will be live; this is because some projects which absolutely need on chain crypto and real world asset prices are confident enough to use essentially centralized feeds over chainlink given that those feeds will be from trusted data providers (lookup the nodary service from chainlink consulting group)
Those will be the nodes most in demand before payment APIs are integrated; once those are up and running smoothly linkpool will let all the neets to get ready with their neet nodes
Hence the may-aug window for "real" mainnet
But the cherry on top won't come until the end of 2019: remember how this all started. The reason anyone cares about chainlink is SWIFT, full stop.

Why did the most powerful banking collective bankroll sergey and back link? Because they're so nice? I know you all are fucking retarded and won't get it so here it is: SWIFT is how establishment banks comply with PSD2 and, instead of getting their lunch eaten, make MORE money.

Oh, you're an ambitious startup that needs access to our customers balances? we've mad our data fully available through the industry-standard, trusted, decentralized Chainlink network, you're free to access them there at any time. And just in time to meet the regulations of PSD2.

What's that? You're upset that each access costs more than you have allocated for such transactions and now you can't compete? Well that's just a shame. I mean we did have LINK available for over a year at less than a dollar. Why didn't you buy then? And you're mad that we hold 30% of the supply? Why wouldn't we? Look at what a fine investment it has been, friend.

Screencap or pasta this or whatever. You're all too fucking dumb to even understand what is above. I hope the next generation of lonely introverts feeling pol/b/fit are smarter than you idiots.

I was going to try and educate you all but it's a lost cause

True winners only play when they've won the moment they get on the field. Playing with the other team having any possibility of winning is a failure of preparation and evidence of inadequate discipline.

You all are sitting there holding your neet dicks praying for dollars for your waifus. Think about who actually runs the project and what the project really is. Don't you think it's funny that chainlink is the industry standard, is integrated at the kernel level for writing smart contracts and that a decentralized oracle network (link being the only one) is required for a smart contract to be legally binding?

And the network doesnt. even. exist.

If you believe the shit on the pivotal for one second you are a sucker. If you think the project hasn't been done and production ready for a year you're a fool.

The worst thing that could possibly happen to legacy banks was legislated by the EU. Watch what real winners do when faggot legislators try and push them around. They'll end up richer, more powerful and more entrenched than ever. And, oh yeah, they'll be able to fire half of their back office staff while doing it.

That's how winners play the game. Link exists for banks. You, through dumb fucking luck, get to come along for the ride. If you don't get smart you'll only be renting your money until its rightful owners come home.

>muh literally unimportant Eurofag psd2 garbage

Brainlet

user, i like this larp. Please continue. I am the lawyer user who shilled docusign team to join up. I see how smart contracts will change the legal transactional field, but i am afraid that it may take 10 yrs plus. Do you have insight into real adoption time lines?

>What's that? You're upset that each access costs more than you have allocated for such transactions and now you can't compete? Well that's just a shame. I mean we did have LINK available for over a year at less than a dollar. Why didn't you buy then? And you're mad that we hold 30% of the supply? Why wouldn't we? Look at what a fine investment it has been, friend.
>*EEEEEEEEEE*
>Larp buzzer sounds
>*wee-ooo wee-oooo*
>"Alright sunshine, larp police here. You're comin' wit us..."
Oof. And you were doing so well.

Attached: apu clown hd.png (2048x2048, 804K)

So youre saying pivotal tracker is just showing the final check of the code thats been complete since last year? Really?

I cant believe I still come here
OK
ETHCC will have Link be the designated oracle for polkadot
In April the first uses of what you call mainnet will be live; this is because some projects which absolutely need on chain crypto and real world asset prices are confident enough to use essentially centralized feeds over chainlink given that those feeds will be from trusted data providers (lookup the nodary service from chainlink consulting group)
Those will be the nodes most in demand before payment APIs are integrated; once those are up and running smoothly linkpool will let all the neets to get ready with their neet nodes
Hence the may-aug window for "real" mainnet
But the cherry on top won't come until the end of 2019: remember how this all started. The reason anyone cares about chainlink is SWIFT, full stop.

Why did the most powerful banking collective bankroll sergey and back link? Because they're so nice? I know you all are fucking retarded and won't get it so here it is: SWIFT is how establishment banks comply with PSD2 and, instead of getting their lunch eaten, make MORE money.

Oh, you're an ambitious startup that needs access to our customers balances? we've mad our data fully available through the industry-standard, trusted, decentralized Chainlink network, you're free to access them there at any time. And just in time to meet the regulations of PSD2.

What's that? You're upset that each access costs more than you have allocated for such transactions and now you can't compete? Well that's just a shame. I mean we did have LINK available for over a year at less than a dollar. Why didn't you buy then? And you're mad that we hold 30% of the supply? Why wouldn't we? Look at what a fine investment it has been, friend.

Screencap or pasta this or whatever. You're all too fucking dumb to even understand what is above. I hope the next generation of lonely introverts feeling pol/b/fit are smarter than you idiots.

>a decentralized oracle network (link being the only one) is required for a smart contract to be legally binding

This is unfortunately where you lost my attention. There is nothing requiring a decentralized Oracle in order for a smart legal contract to be binding. Market practice? Yes, most likely. But required by law? No.

There is a Vishnu in the chainlink blockchain.
This is not FUD, it is a simple fact.

Let lost you larping pleb

Today @Chainlink team is proud to announce something great @Tether is our new partnership to produce the most stable coin in all the cryptomarket 1 LINK = 0.41 USDT, making LINK closer to our goal as a real asset backed token

>88 get for Heil Hitler
>420 get, Hitlers birthday was 4/20
Mirin digits but you really do devour bait.

Stop thinking like a technerd and start thinking like a business- in every project the needs of the funders are the only needs that matter.

If you were a swift bank and had supposedly bank-killing legislation that a bunch of lazy faggot never-worked-a-day-in-their-lives EU bureaucrats dreamed up passed out of thin air on you, how would you feel?

If you were a construction company and the government mandated that you loan your tools out to anyone looking to get into the biz, how would you feel?

If you were a doctor and you were required to allow anyone, regardless of training, to treat patients and do surgery because of a law a group of proud retards passed (and when the patients got fucked up you had to fix them for free), how would you feel?

Bankers are greedly little fucks with inferiority complexes. If anyone is going to take something like psd2 and do something truly vindictive in response, its them.

So what do they do? Launch Chainlink and let the best man win? Or launch Chainlink, provide accurate information to the legacy banking group and provide NOTHING to the rest of the world. Its almost like they want the project to look like nothing. But, of course, it's something, and potentially something big. And that will have to get out at some point. So when?

If it were me, it would be the day before I have to comply with psd2, so that all those inexperienced "fintech" bros who couldn't wait to take on swift have no warning, and suddenly face a nearly insurmountable hurdle to even getting their networks off the ground.

But again, that's just me. I'm probably a meanie. I'm sure the legacy banking elite are really nice folks who just want to play nice in the sandbox and lube up their asses for an ungrateful generation of proto-socialists who have all the confidence in the world from having contributed nothing to it.

Do you think link can reach triple digits next bullrun? What is your opinion on ethereum as a long term hold?

This fucking guys credentials are that he owns some Chainlink.

Mainnet WILL be tomorrow, but it will be limited to the big boys. Trustworthy known providers that will be assumed to not act maliciously. It will be somewhat centralized less than 100 nodes. They're gonna start moving data

This fag is right though. No staking for a couple months. Johnny said no linkpool for a couple months after mainnet. That's the clue.

Have you been following the progress of accord/openlaw/rocketlawyer?
Don't you think it's a little suspect that they are discussing smart contracts like the link network already exists?

>If you were a swift bank and had supposedly bank-killing legislation that a bunch of lazy faggot never-worked-a-day-in-their-lives EU bureaucrats dreamed up passed out of thin air on you, how would you feel?
This is such a bad take. I bet you own a lot of silver.

Here's another hint for you:
Early on the internet was genuine because there was a large hurdle to adoption and small audience. High quality information abounded.

If you believe anything on social or mainstream media today, you are an absolute fool. The cost is too low and benefits too high for it to be anything other than a primary advertising steam.

ANYTHING that takes effort to put on the internet exists for the benefit of the producer. Sometimes it's to sell ads, sometimes its to make people act against their own interests, but it's ALWAYS at the cost of the consumer.

You are consuming the pivotal. What are they getting from you in exchange?

How do you know all this? More importantly, why are you taking your time to post this on Jow Forums to a bunch of racist neets?

only idiots make price predictions. especially in a market driven primarily by retail investors who don't even understand how the assets they're purchasing work. All I can say is that link has the best fundamentals in crypto and over time price is drawn to fundamentals. How long stupid people can remain irrational is anyone's guess
You are saying that a project funded by legacy banks and working with them is going to take steps against their best interests. Feel free to tell me why the team would do that.
Provide a better one. But you can't because you're a fucking idiot.

thanks for the info fren, hope you will not get in trouble.

Attached: 1533398362914.png (785x827, 98K)

Larp or not, I'm more entertained than for months in here.

this larp reminds me of the fomo i felt when assblaster was still shitposting here, fuuuuck frens i only have 30,000 link, i could have more but i sold for some shitcoins that may never moon, i only did it to buy more link though... fuuuuuaaark bro

I agree Accord has massive reach and these partnerships have huge potential for adoption, but unless you know something I don’t (which is possible), I see no proposed legislation or regulation mandating decentralized oracles. I do think it will be prevailing market practice though

>Provide a better one.
Swift is more like a political organisation than a typical F500. They are an intermediary between rival banks. All they care about is promoting harmonious trade standards across the world, which helps them increase membership. You are misunderstanding that they *benefit* from the open source/open banking movements. They don't need to have some weird conspiracy plan. They can genuinely foster open banking and rely on their heft to carry them through. It's the same reason google open sources a lot of their software.
>you're a fucking idiot
I may be an idiot, but I haven't had sex in years.

>What are they getting from you in exchange?

low prices & more time to accumulate because the project doesn't look finished on pivotal? is that what you mean?

what ARE they getting from pivotal-consumers?

link swoops in on the future of finance, law and the web. pretty good going

nice reddit spacing fag. 7.5/10 larp though please continue

I'm fucking sick of the LARPs. I've held LINK since ICO, participated in all major threads, created some memes, have seen the breadcrumbs. For a while I really thought we were going to make it. Just counting the days until financial freedom. This is a war of attrition and I've fucking lost. Nobody is getting rich from this shit. It really was just a meme built on countless contingencies. My crypto portfolio has withered away to nothing. 99% of my net worth is tied up in a 50k LINK stack. I have nothing else to subsist on. Bills are piling up, as I'm a former NEET turned uni student. Life really fucking sucks right now. Every time I think of Sergey or Rory or Thomas or any of those fags I just want to grab them by the throat and end it all. These fucking shitheads are literally playing with us at this point. I'm living in poverty, alongside countless other LINK NEETs simply because those faggots hate us and don't want to make us rich yet. If ever. This reads like pasta but I just typed every word. I'm so fucking sick of this project and very soon I will have no choice but to liquidate.

You really didnt address my question. The application of smart contracts goes way beyond just banks. Dozens of global law firms are on board even though there may only be a handful of ppl at the firm who understand this tech and what it can do to the legal profession (transactionally). They must know something as well. The thing is, i don't see clients getting on board smart transactions for awhile, most clients are too dumb. So, my question is how long in your opinion until the price jumps. If we need mass adoption, it will take at least a decade for main stream legal smart contracts, not because of lack of tech but because of lack of consumer understanding.

Why would I get in trouble? I have nothing to do with the team and I've already made it even if link goes to 0
What am I LARPing as? Someone who has been successful and understands how the world works?
Here's another question you will NEVER see discussed on biz because you're all poor and dumb: why would you invest in anything that adds stress to your life? Do you think that people who are smart and rich invest in shady projects they watch every day? Or do they invest in high quality people with strong work ethics and rock solid moral compasses so then they can enjoy how awesome their lives are while those people work their asses off to join the ranks?
Why do you think that people who are wealthy are smarter, nicer, more moral and better looking than those who are forever poor or new rich?
Things become standard in law after a bellweather case. From that point forward x is established as legal and nobody does y because it not only implies legal risk, but also it implies willful ignorance of a pathway that has been secured as compliant and legal.
You realize that every "collective" that exists for professions exists solely for their interests, right? In medicine you find the professional organizations of various specialties make standards that are not in the interest of their patients or their payors but their funders. The same thing is true of trade organizations, lobbying groups etc.
If you think that swift will do ANYTHING that isn't in the direct interest of legacy member banks, you really don't understand how the world works.
Lets say you were an up-and-coming fintech even with a bunch of smart people and plenty of funding. You know you'll need access to payment APIs and you've got some options, but nothing you know for sure will be the winner. What do you do?
You research, and when you research swift API access via link, you get the very well set out pivotal...

Plz explain the digits link gets then, you think this just happens?

Attached: 55968731049240BEB9CDF8DF7FF0824A.png (1868x732, 193K)

gay larper

...since you aren't coders you hire a few nerds for $100 an hour to tell you what the github and pivotal mean. They explain what the collective Jow Forums hivemind knows about link. So you do the smart thing: you wait until the network launches and see if it is a success

You did everything right, and now you're fucked

Because once you know whether the network works, access costs 100x what it used to. And all the competitors are facing the same problem you are: pay rates above what your business model can sustain for payments access, or go under.

If anyone here has played higher stakes poker, its the same thing that goes on at those tables. None of the true fish exist anymore, but the algorithmic players can be beaten relatively easily (and at less variance) if you know what kind of standard play they needed to perfect to beat the low and middle stakes.

I take back my earlier comment about bait. I like you.

Attached: 1517247057990.png (700x735, 16K)

you dont know anything
no proofs to your claims

Again, why are you telling us this information? What is in it for you?

>If you think that swift will do ANYTHING that isn't in the direct interest of legacy member banks, you really don't understand how the world works.
you're of course correct about this and i don't disagree with anything you've said, but you seem to have a lot of disdain for biz and yet you're ostensibly helping us out. please explain how helping us is in your direct interest.

he is a larper and all his posts are 100% made up bullshit.
he has no proofs to back anything up and he can't even write "portfolio" right in the OP.

pajeet shilling and fud.
in other words making it seem like yet another crypto scam.

although of course, it could actually be just another crypto scam. difficult to tell.

Even if he is a larper, his posts make sense, so he has intrigued me.

>Organisations act in the interests of their members
This is a tautology. But you have a clear bias towards sinister conspiracies that is colouring your conclusions. For instance, SWIFT is definitely NOT working to maliciously price-out small fintech companies, as you are suggesting.

You sound like a stupid person. You won;t believe me but you should hope that link doesn't make you rich because your current life habits indicate that if you get rich you will be poor again and even more miserable than you are right now.
Fix your life first, then get money so you can enjoy more of it.
You are asking about price. The people who dictate price are the same people who follow crypto celebs and buy the cup and handle.
One thing Sergey has said that makes a lot of sense (and is probably actually honest) is that derivatives and insurance will be first. those things are actually the same thing; just ways for people to decrease risk in their lives in exchange for losing a small amount of long term value. If those things only required a negligible amount of cost, the use cases are very wide. If everything and every event were insurable for a 1% overall cost, what would you insure/hedge in your life? In your business?
There are a lot of people interested in link. Some of them have nothing better to do than to write bots that try to post at given post numbers.
Stop trying to find magic in bullshit and realize that if you dig deep enough almost everything on Earth has amazing aspects to it.

he doesn't make sense at all
>muh conspiracy theory I pulled out of my asshole
this is all he has.

What about their github repo? Are you saying everything there is fake too? They're doing a pretty good job of making it look like they're actually working and committing things last I checked.

Euro banking regulations? Psd2 or something?

OK STOP FUCKING AROUND AND TELL ME IF I'M GOING TO BE RICH OR NOT

in case I wasn't clear enough, I was answering your question OP: what are they getting from us in exchange? they're getting pajeet shilling and fud...

he doesnt know anything
just another shitposter

fucking lying larping faggit, chainlink was shilled to DocuSign by an angel investor who has a stake in both.

You have said nothing interesting, apart from one prediction that Link will be announced as the oracle of choice for Polkadot. An announcement which was already made last year.

This shitty piece of improv will already be out of date in 24hours time

if swift's plan is to gate their apis behind a giant paywall, then why did chainlinkn do a public ico? if banks were acting out of their own self interest, wouldn't they want it private for a bigger stake?

>If you believe the shit on the pivotal for one second you are a sucker. If you think the project hasn't been done and production ready for a year you're a fool.

Larp. Had me before this. All you have to do is go on the github and its pretty clear the project is still under develoment

Keep going with these pearls! Even if you feel they are being cast among swine

most desperate shilling ive ever seen. linkies truly are fools

>believing some shizo larpist

Did I ever claim to be anything? Show me
What are my options in life? I have plenty of money and my kids are all smarter and better people than me. My wife cooks and cleans for me and I don't lift a finger when home. I grew up on the internet and Jow Forums. Shitposting somewhere that free speech is still allowed is fun for basement dwelling furries and wealthy larpfags alike
You people are so beaten down and cowardly that you don't listen unless someone abuses you. I started this thread trying to teach you all how to think logically through a situation that, on its surface, doesn't appear logical. Clearly you needed some remediation. And it's fun to call you faggots and get called a cum guzzling aids nigger in return
Dang, i had ya fooled until this plucky guy figured me out. Good show old chap
If you think there's a chance that link is a scam you are genuinely unironically retarded. There is a small chance that it does not succeed, but it is the exact opposite of a scam.
This is another mark of smart but immature thinking. NOBODY who does malicious things thinks they are being malicious. The communist murderes thought they were bringing about utopia in the 20th century. SWIFT doesn't sit there plotting against fintechs, it sits there "optimizing the playing field for our member banks"

listen, we get it. You understand the value of psd2 and you saw the puzzle pieces arranged for link to become the behemoth it was destined to be. Stop acting like an insufferable fag about it tho. Most of the ICO marines here have known this for well over a year. We shitpost and fud for the keks and also becuz no one fucking needs to know what we already know. You aren't illuminating this board. WE ALREADY KNOW. I get it. you see the memes, fud, shitposting etc. and take us all for brainlets, cuz its the easiest thing for your perception to understand, but the reality is a bit more difficult. We aren't al neets, we aren't all idiots, in fact a good many of us are well connected, well informed, and just like coming here to blow off steam and scan for the diamond in the rough intel we find every now and again. Your ego posting is helpful to new linkers and no linkers, but not to the true marines. I repeat. WE ALREADY FUCKING KNOW.

So stop taking yourself so seriously, and relax a little bit bucko.

HONK HONK

>wearing pants

Attached: 1541951013389.png (750x1189, 142K)

I am asking price, but this does not exist in a bubble. There are deficits in current systems and knowkedge gaps in current talent pools. If i go to speak at the sunset partners at my firm about how this will benefit our practice they will be clueless. It's not because they are dumb, titanic shifts in business structures take time for people understand and use these new tools. I doubt that even swift has a team that is ready to use this new tool even completed. Its because the tool never existed before. So, while i agree with the fundamentals of the tokenomics, i am concerned with the adoption timeline and i want to know your thoughts on that matter specifically.

"my entire crypto portfoilio is Link"
PUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>Show me
>If you believe the shit on the pivotal for one second you are a sucker. If you think the project hasn't been done and production ready for a year you're a fool.
show proof to your claims or you are a Larp.
oh wait you cant because you are some stupid fucking nigger who can't and who pulled all this shit out of his ass.

>when you realize the smart and already made man OP can't even write "portfolio" right.

not even favelanigger would fall for this larp.

Oops, just finished reading thread. Never mind.

This is a fascinating thread. Thank you, OP!

If the position was reversed, and you were reading this thread while someone else was sharing this information, what do you think would be the most important question to ask them?

And how did you find out about chainlink?

I have actual "insider" info about two things mentioned, and OP is wrong about those, so is a larp. I do not know when mainnet either though.

Youre a fucking retard. I personally shilled it to Moyle who shilled it to Gosner. I've discussed this several times on here before. You should be sucking my dick for the immense contribution I've made for link.

the thing is the larp is so bad you don't even need insider info to see it for the bad larp that it is.

this cum guzzling aids nigger thinks code on github is just for "show"

Do you think the token value will be set in stone once PSD2 become law? As in, will the price simply 100x and stay there in perpetuity or will it still be at the mercy of supply and demand in the overall crypto market (not just what businesses are willing to pay banks)?

lowest IQ larp thread we've had in a while

How bigs ur stack

>I started this thread trying to teach you all how to think logically through a situation that, on its surface, doesn't appear logical. Clearly you needed some remediation.
ok, but how does us our remediation help you?

no fag, you might have shilled it to moyle who then shilled it to gonser, but by the someone a grade or 7 above you had already brought it to them. He was an early investor in DocuSign, salesforce, stripe, uber, etc. and he has a personal stake in link. He shilled it b4 there was a token, ico, or any awareness of it on biz. Now taking your logic, you should be sucking his cock. He can usually be found in panama this time of year. Eat shit retard.

See above about their pivotal. Anything that is transparent and easy to see from a top flight project is something they have a vested interest in you seeing.
Yes
See above about price predictions.
If you honestly want to get rich now, learn to be a youtube crypto celeb and start shilling in a lambo
See the above part about fintechs. The pivotal/git/updates aren't for you the retail investor. But they are intentional.
I remember when I read ABs threads I knew he wasn't all he said he was, but that he definitely had experience in the banking sector. He was a semi-larp and even kind of admitted it (he said that he had fun getting the attention of a big shot). One thing he said that gave some creedence is the open nature of chainlink, at least in name. In other words, if they did everything privately and psd2 launched, they would have to give away access or could face legal action as not being compliant with providing open banking. Remember smartcontract/chainlink have had the full SWIFT logo on their home page for over a year now. If they launch it last minute and someone complains that they're locked out, they really have no quarter.
See above about the git as well. Have you ever coded? You do understand it is possible to write and run code without posting it to github, right?
I was one of you. So was every successful person at sometime (except maybe royalty etc.). You need to be called faggot retards to get sharp enough to not get exploited. Better an oldfag flame you on the internet than you actually get rolled in the real world.
I am telling people that events they want to see will not happen when they want them to happen. If you think that is shilling you are too dumb to live

I like this larp and have concluded with my inner thoughts that it is in fact, factual. The best attorneys in court do not ask a question they don't already know the answer to.

People think XRP is the bankers coin but after meeting and discussing with my inner thoughts again we have concluded this assumption to be incorrect. It would be correct in saying LINK is in fact the true bankers coin.

I posture for everyone to dig deep into their subconscious and to meet up with and converse with their higher power. If one does this act you will immediately understand the implications of the reality in which our current forms have manifested us into this point in time on a racist moldovian shrimp fucking forum.

The forces of nature at play here and the power they yield are unimaginable. The coin you all have come to know as the LINK isn't actually a coin. It's a key. Those who hold will be unchained from their matrix slave status as they start to ascend into the ranks of the true master race.

>still no proofs for his retarded conspiracy

>The best attorneys in court do not ask a question they don't already know the answer to.
the best Larper would have evidence supporting his claims before making those.
otherwise his Larp falls apart quick when people simply ask him to provide evidence which he doesn't have.

Fucking hate docusign. Their gui is bullshit for admins

What proof can I show? I've already said that I am not a member of the team
Thing that I would want to know is the opposite side risk: lets say that something happens eg moratorium on new regulation in the eurozone etc.- how do I find out about that before the people with the ability to dump on me? Maybe I can't, but if the major driver behind the funders of the project is going to not exist, I want to know how to know about it.
Share or forever hold your peace
Yes
No, but one of the pricing methods I used when I looked into link early on was x number of accesses to banking APIs. It may be that what ends up driving the floor of link pricing.
You are me
Just younger and dumber
Why would you spend any time arguing over this on an anonymous image board?

do you think that the chainlink network has room to grow outside of just being the platform that swift builds their wall on?