>SWIFT, zeppelin, accord, docusign, brave new coin, etc
>ico level partnerships
HEAR ME OUT
LMAO OP just btfo these stupid stinky linkies. Get dabbed on stinkers. Nice piece of shit middle-ware band aid solution
>it's the same problem
No, it's not.
You've been in here for over 7 hours now, talking about something you think is worthless.
Why?
you've just listed a bunch of memes on biz as if they were facts. there's no evidence to suggest that chainlink, and explicitly link, is going to be used in any of those places.
Now I know you're fudding or just need to lurk more
My company has a deal with oracle. If they fuck up with the data they send to my business intelligence tool, they provide me with insurance. The insurance is paid by a third party
because nobody has been able to come up with a single refutation other than arguing the semantics of what i'm saying.
you wouldn't understand if you haven't been around for long, but biz used to be great for actual discussion, especially around the launch of ethereum. going much deeper on ethereum than i was comfortable with back when it wasn't looking good for ethereum at all (delayed launch, lots of high profile [legitimate] criticism against it) has made me significantly more money than i would have otherwise. until you've experienced that you're free to think of biz as an echo chamber for your comfort threads, but it's definitely worth my while to actually try and get some information, and surprise surprise, nobody ever actually discusses chainlink outside of biz.
>lurk more
a bunch of meme comfort threads by bagholders is not evidence of actual usage or intent. again, most of these supposed partnerships would necessitate only providing the data, never trusting anything from it, they simply couldn't get insurance using something like chainlink.
And another long-winded post about something you claim is worthess.
You must have the shittiest life imaginable.
there's some serious projection going on here, must have been hit hard last year.