youtube.com
>high IQ individuals tend towards INFP and ISTJ
INTJ/INTP BTFO
High IQ individuals tend towards INFP and ISTJ
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
very VERY good post
12:00 minute mark
You know there is actual data on this
>gifted/normal ratio
This isn't IQ. COPE
Seems like you're the one coping friendo
This is just embarrassing.
This is a logician/architect room
Go back to plebbit
There's actually a perfectly linear relationship between how iNtuitive your are and your IQ. The N/S dimension is actually just a euphemism for intelligence. For the other 3 traits it's a bit more complex, for example I's are generally smarter than E's but a mild I is less intelligent on average than an extreme E.
>There's actually a perfectly linear relationship between how iNtuitive your are and your IQ
That's not true. Plenty of intuitives who don't have the reasoning skills to make anything of it. It's a correlation, but sure as hell not perfectly linear.
thread bookmarked, watch later
>INFP
Never gonna make it.
ISTJ here and i can confirm that i indeed do have a huge forehead.
ISTJ is the most patrician. INTJ tends to attract autistic ancaps. Ancaps are worthless human beings.
Lol what about entp
MBTI is pseudo-science you bucketheads
It doesn't claim to be a science at all.
I got INFJ, our results came during a large lecture with like 100 students. I was the only one with INFJ as far as I remember. I'm a total fucking retard loser at age 28 so I don't think it matters much.
You don't seem to understand what MBTI is. It's nothing more than a self-help tool; a way to understand the psychology of yourself and others. What you're implying is tantamount to saying that stereotypes and categories are pseydoscience.
>Scientific racism – claim that scientific evidence shows the inferiority or superiority of certain races.
>pseudoscience
list discarded
Try thinking about it instead of just sensing the pretty letters.
They also list brainwashing as a pseudoscience. Imagine actually trusting wikipedia
>unable to see that MBTI is a bullshit feelgood "test"
>thinks he has a high IQ
>brainwashing is untrue (cults)
>neurolinguistic programming does not enhance persuasiveness (useful in the non-science field of marketing)
This is what you are implying with your weak grasp of what qualifies something as pseudoscience. Pseudoscience just labels something as failing to meet the rigors to be considered part of a scientific discipline. Nothing more, nothing less. There is no additional claim that the techniques espoused, demonstrable outcomes, or usefulness of observations are negated.
WE'RE AUTISTIC NOW BOYS
>Pseudoscience just labels something as failing to meet the rigors to be considered part of a scientific discipline.
According to this definition, language is a pseudoscience. Try again apologist.
Everyone who is an S is retarded.
How do I know if I'm INFP or ISFP?