High IQ individuals tend towards INFP and ISTJ

youtube.com/watch?v=ABN-QNzxa2g
>high IQ individuals tend towards INFP and ISTJ
INTJ/INTP BTFO

Attached: Screenshot_2019-03-10 Psychological and Social Disorders of High IQ - YouTube.png (298x282, 109K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

very VERY good post

12:00 minute mark

You know there is actual data on this

Attached: mbtigifted2.gif (714x368, 22K)

Attached: mbtigifted1.gif (385x324, 16K)

>gifted/normal ratio
This isn't IQ. COPE

Seems like you're the one coping friendo

Attached: MBTI statistics.gif (700x566, 57K)

This is just embarrassing.

This is a logician/architect room
Go back to plebbit

Attached: moon.png (1157x789, 105K)

There's actually a perfectly linear relationship between how iNtuitive your are and your IQ. The N/S dimension is actually just a euphemism for intelligence. For the other 3 traits it's a bit more complex, for example I's are generally smarter than E's but a mild I is less intelligent on average than an extreme E.

>There's actually a perfectly linear relationship between how iNtuitive your are and your IQ
That's not true. Plenty of intuitives who don't have the reasoning skills to make anything of it. It's a correlation, but sure as hell not perfectly linear.

thread bookmarked, watch later

>INFP
Never gonna make it.

Attached: 1544233037931.png (2546x1160, 623K)

ISTJ here and i can confirm that i indeed do have a huge forehead.

ISTJ is the most patrician. INTJ tends to attract autistic ancaps. Ancaps are worthless human beings.

Lol what about entp

MBTI is pseudo-science you bucketheads

It doesn't claim to be a science at all.

I got INFJ, our results came during a large lecture with like 100 students. I was the only one with INFJ as far as I remember. I'm a total fucking retard loser at age 28 so I don't think it matters much.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnum_effect

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics_characterized_as_pseudoscience

You don't seem to understand what MBTI is. It's nothing more than a self-help tool; a way to understand the psychology of yourself and others. What you're implying is tantamount to saying that stereotypes and categories are pseydoscience.

>Scientific racism – claim that scientific evidence shows the inferiority or superiority of certain races.
>pseudoscience
list discarded

Try thinking about it instead of just sensing the pretty letters.

They also list brainwashing as a pseudoscience. Imagine actually trusting wikipedia

>unable to see that MBTI is a bullshit feelgood "test"
>thinks he has a high IQ

>brainwashing is untrue (cults)
>neurolinguistic programming does not enhance persuasiveness (useful in the non-science field of marketing)

This is what you are implying with your weak grasp of what qualifies something as pseudoscience. Pseudoscience just labels something as failing to meet the rigors to be considered part of a scientific discipline. Nothing more, nothing less. There is no additional claim that the techniques espoused, demonstrable outcomes, or usefulness of observations are negated.

WE'RE AUTISTIC NOW BOYS

>Pseudoscience just labels something as failing to meet the rigors to be considered part of a scientific discipline.
According to this definition, language is a pseudoscience. Try again apologist.

Everyone who is an S is retarded.

How do I know if I'm INFP or ISFP?