He still thinks BSV is a scam

t. just read wikipedia

Does it even say that in the Wikipedia page? I figured those cucks would take the approved approach to Schrodinger's ideas.

But he's actually been proven wrong. Quantum mechanics is just fucking weird and really does not seem to follow human intuition.

I cant wait to see all scam coiners get rekt. If you bothered to read the whitepaper you would see that bsv is bitcoin, and that it was btc and bch that forked. Instead you let yourself act like sockpuppets for blockstream. You are literally too stupid to make it. You are far from smart money, which you will learn the STIFF way.

Attached: 15000024355.png (1477x563, 703K)

Where is the bloated OP_RETURN mentioned in the bitcoin whitepaper?
>ELECTRONIC p2p CASH
not
>p2p GENERAL PURPOSE DATABASE

Modern science has become a theoretical meme. You can't actually prove shit anymore, because it's all theories based on theories based on theories.

Quantum Mechanics doesn't exist. have you ever seen a wave function? Daily reminder scientists make this up to get grant money. It's all bullshit

>Doesn't know about the renaissance of electric universe/plasma physics

>he still posts day in and day out thinking people will pump his BSV bags

Lol.

Oh, so a non-halting turing machine...

creg is going to redpill a ton of people on CS concepts because they'll actually have to learn about them to see through his fucking bullshit.

> rofl

>hasn’t read the white paper

Nice hash rate you got there bub. LMFAO

I blame Dedekind, shouldn't have cut the real number line. Just start that shit at zero.

> Based and Conwaypilled

For dummies:

Imagine having a machine which goes from state A to B and then to C or D or E.

Now we go from state A to B.
Now we go from state B to C.
Now we go back to state B and go to D.

We now have two parallel states of the same machine, the cat is dead and alive at the same time.

We can even use the output of state D to recalculate the input for state B to get a better result which might bring us to state E this time.

Yes, this even enables a new form of machine learning and all sorts of app.

Its even a new way of thinking therefore bring application which were simple not possible before.

Remember, each state is an immutable timestamp and each output is also an timestamp and the app itself is just the order of timestamped code snippets which can be changed at will.

Ultimately, Vishnu will emerge on the Bitcoin SV chain.

Attached: 2vv77m.jpg (666x500, 84K)

>Ultimately, Vishnu will emerge on the Bitcoin SV chain.
This made me kek. Thanks for a nice explanation

How can't this be implemented in a simple program?

Your simple program can be shut down, Vishnu will live forever.
Your simple program needs trust,
Vishnu works trustless.
Your simple program can't be changed by rearranging transaction.
Your simple program can't be used/arranged by everyone.
Your simple program is not secure.

Blockchain changes everything, Bitcoin SV is THE blockchain

Bitcoin SV is A blockchain, this can't be denied. It definitely isn't bitcoin, but something of it's own breed of thing. Perhaps better, perhaps worse, but significantly different from DLTs.

So is this something that can be termed as "useful proof of work"?

It's not a proof of work it's the explanation of possibilities.

Look, someone allready uploaded JavaScript libraries to the chain.

You as a coder only need to call the functions in a transaction to run code now.

It's so amazing. And if I run a transaction which calls a few functions which are stored in a different transaction and build a calculator out if it.... You could then make a transaction which calls my calculator function to calculate a number.

Your result could then be called from a new transaction and be used for whatever reason.

And so on...

It is bitcoin. And it's easy logic.

Bitcoin was defined by a protocol which is "set in stone".
Segwit changed the protocol, therefore it's not what was defined.
BCH changed the protocol, therefore it's not what was defined.

Bsv didn't change and is actively restoring the original protocol, which enables all this great stuff, therefore is what was defined.

Sounds like a regular mesh of libraries that produce more libraries/project with no need for OP_RETURN-db

OP_RETURN wasn't in the protocol.

Yes you can either call a program by a transaction, or you can build, call and run your own program by sending transactions in a particular order to onchain libraries

> lets confuse non programmers into buying our shitcoin
> talk about state machines and cats
> don't give any runnable examples, we can't
Your nonsense is a shame on the crypto space.

no, segwit was a soft-fork, bcash1 and bcash2 were hard forks, with explicit undoing of security protection satoshi put in to prevent minority forks like bcash in the first place.

bitcoin is the only valid bitcoin, there is no "left over" chain from before segwit, because that chain still exists UNDER segwit today in bitcoin. that same chain stops for bcash right when they invalidated the proof of work algorithm for chinese profitability purposes.

It was in 0.1.0
Here's the code:

case OP_RETURN:
{
pc = pend;
}
break;

Where can I find JavaScript ?

There is no such thing as a soft fork.
You got manipulated by social media.

Bitcoin is what is defined as bitcoin.
You can't change the definition.
If your "modification" is not aligning with the definition anymore, it's not what was defined.

has Craig Wright already disclosed the fatal segwit vulnerability?

If not BTFO

>he still thinks BSV is not a scam

Is btc still above 0?

Attached: 495AB382-6657-4B56-8458-3D84B0AB5EA5.jpg (552x615, 30K)

Of course he hasn't. He is moving between lies hoping to hop into relevance.
Instead he is sinking into being a joke.

Bitcoin is not a general purpose database

>bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/50414/what-was-the-very-initial-value-of-op-return/50416
>Back then, OP_RETURN didn't necessarily cause a script to fail. You could also use it in the scriptSig of a transaction, meaning that you could steal anyone's Bitcoins by pushing a non-zero value and calling OP_RETURN. Ah, those were the days

Right, Bitcoin is not, it's sound money.
But Metanet is.

Finally someone who gets it. The brainlet state of biz... I am unironically all in on BSV, accumulated over 120 by now.

enjoy your bags. ethereum already renders this trash obsolete.

Ethereum is rendering anything on its 17tps

You obviously have NO idea how ethereum works

Is not*

prove it

No, you have to proof your claim that etherum can do the same before.
Waiting..

If ETH is so good, why isn't anyone doing anything with it?

All the talent is moving over to SV.

I don't care about tokens or escrow contracts.

Can u show me the java script on BSV pls

Attached: 117D882B-034F-4807-A303-ED438D44507E.gif (430x498, 966K)

The gall of these pseuds and scammers

Atlantistic.slack.com

docs.bitdb.network/docs/tutorial_v3

So much knowledge that even fudders keep quit. This needs a bump

pro sv side stated that metanet is not bitcoin. they BTFO themselves

Metanet is beeing build on top of bitcoin without changing bitcoin.