What will Jow Forums do when Yang wins?

>You don’t get it bud. It’s not about him winning, it’s about political discourse and a shifting of public opinion. Democrats can act like their cult folllowers want Biden or Neolib, but when everyone with a voice is yelling for the underdog and the neolib wins without evidenced then things can get rowdy.

But that is literally what happened with Bernie. Everyone wanted the underdog to win and then... nothing happened. You idiots still voted along party lines, as shown by Hillary winning the popular vote. You proved to the DNC that they can fuck you in the ass and you will still come back to do their bidding. Your party is a joke and you are stupid for even voting for them in any context.

If you like a person, tell them to run as a Republican or independent. If not then you are a slave. It's funny because Trump voted Democrat (as I'm sure they are the easiest to pay off to do your bidding), but when he wanted to run he went for the Republicans because he knew that no matter his popularity, the DNC would just pick their robot of the year.

UBI is actually not the worse idea in the world, but it is not what the dems want. Stop voting for them. Stop even considering them as a legitimate political party. They already showed you they are not! How can you be so delusional and stupid? Yang will get STIFFED and then NOTHING WILL HAPPEN. Just like Bernie.

What logic is this?

But something did happen with Bernie, even though the MSM has to cover the tracks, many people were woken up by that scandal. People aren’t going to all just become “redpilled” or whatever overnight but little cracks in the foundation will cause the dam to break.

Trump is a big breaking point for a lot of people as they still see that the system promotes neocons. He’s a shill, a lie but he leaves breadcrumbs that people can follow.

running democrat/republican/whatever doesn’t fucking matter when the entire governmental system is compromised. There’s no recovering the system it has to be brought down.

Not him but I have thought of a particular scheme. In a world where every landlord knows every poor person has at least 1000$ it makes sense to appeal to them. UBI will inevitably create an underclass of UBI dependents (as UBI experiments in Europe proved UBI lowers productivity) so what will you do? Take a normal apartment, segment it into like 4 living spaces, and then rent it to 4 different UBI dogs who will each pay some reasonable % of 1000. If you have a better apartment, just segment it enough until each tiny living space would be a reasonable amount for an UBI dog.

Now you have apartments with crazy profits because of the UBI dogs, but only if you segment them. This means that the supply of normal non-segmented apartments will go down, and thus rent up.

And this is coming from a guy who doesn't have much investment in real state other than REITs. Only God fucking knows what UBI schemes the real sharks in this business will come up with.

>But something did happen with Bernie, even though the MSM has to cover the tracks, many people were woken up by that scandal. People aren’t going to all just become “redpilled” or whatever overnight but little cracks in the foundation will cause the dam to break.

You all voted along party lines, and still do. Nothing happened. Stop pretending like something happened.

Yeah dude welcome to a market economy. When your culture promotes stealing from your common man, this is the reality that you live in.

So you get it then? You know this will happen. If you know this will happen then why do you support UBI? Do you just hate poor people?

This already happens. I guess the biggest issue here is that people will be less likely to act against their government if they’re giving them money like this

>This already happens
Not enough. From the landlord's perspective, it is actually incredibly hard to find geographical regions where you would find enough demand for these type of shitty living spaces. This is why their risk is only reasonable in areas around universities, where landlords know that a lot of poor people who won't necessarily need the living space 24/7 congregate.

After UBI happens you will just have to wait 2 years for the shift to happen and this underclass of UBI dogs to exist. Once that happens, this type of segmenting won't be a risky exception, but the riskless norm of the housing market.

Either way these people are still getting free housing, correct?

Free yes, but "housing" I don't know. They will be more like dog cages so if you consider that housing then you are in luck.

It’s as if you get it but you don’t
Yang Gang

That's what I've been saying. Trump vs. Yang is a scenario that should be pushed because it's win-win. Doesn't matter if you support Trump or Yang, you should still encourage a Trump vs. Yang 2020 situation. In the first scenario Trump wins and a large group of people have meltdowns. In the second scenario Yang wins and a large group of people, albeit a slightly different blend than Trump, have meltdowns. In the third scenario the DNC sabotages Yang and the establishment's pants fall down for everyone to see again and then Trump wins.

He will never get it through Congress. Meanwhile, he'll easily push through his leftist/progressive agendas, while absorbing more centralized power at the federal government level. You're unironically falling for the memes his PR team was hired to create. Even if UBI is a good idea, it's not happening anytime soon, even if Yang is elected.

There is even less chance he will be allowed to give everyone $1k dollars a month if he wins than Trump getting his wall finished.

He can say whatever he wants but the house and congress are where the real power lies.

That's why Trump can't get his wall funded and that's why yango won't be able to give you free cash.

Already doubled my stack betting on yang

Can't believe he's at 10% already..

UBI is disastrous for a democratic socioeconomy. By definition, it will be a cancerous feedback loop where the politician who promises the most "free money" gets insta-votes until the voting majority of a society are net dependents and there is no other alternative, until we progress to a totally authoritarian system and democracy is done away with entirely and there is mass death and strife as the ultimately authoritarian government is faced with the need to purge and neglect this new mass of helpless dependents and the power to do so without opposition.

Dependency, centralization, these are the enemy. NEETs would be the first to die with no recourse.

Vote for him to destroy the failing system.
Just keep voting in presidents that throw monkeywrenches. You can only start over once you break down what is already there

looking forward to Trump's sweeping victory