SAY IT WITH ME NIGGERS
>MORE CENTRALITY DOESNT EQUAL LESS SECURITY
>ONE CHAIN MEANS WE ALL GET RICH IN BITCOIN TOGETHER
>SMART CONTRACTS WERE MADE ON BITCOIN BEFORE COCKSTREAM REMOVED IT
>BLOCKS CAN SCALE INFINITELY GOOGLE MOORE'S LAW
READ THE WHITEPAPER NUMBNUTS. I WILL NOT SPOONFEED YOU ANY LONGER
BSV is a shitfork of a shitfork and metanet is the most idiotic idea out there in the crypto space.
No one will buy your bags, there is more probability for Dogecoin to moon.
He's right op, Kys.
Bitcoin is meant to be decentralized, trustless, peer to peer CASH
If it's centralized on servers on Calvin's Antiguan shrimp farm plantation, this shit loses its value proposition.
This is also unironically a problem with core, because a majority of hash is located in China. That's bad, but SV's centralization is much worse.
>DECENTRALIZATION
>CENTRALIZATION
>HURR DURR
Not an argument
Knock off brand bitcoin, it will never take off. Its like asking for name brand and getting a shit generic in place, everyone knows it isn't as good and you only got it because you can't afford the real thing. This is the problem with forks in general, best strategy is to stay on the original chain because that's the one with the best chance to succeed in a space like this
fuck off retard
bitcoin is the only one trustless permissionless publicly auditable ledger to date that is secure.
it achieves these properties via various mechanisms ultimately depending on sufficient levels of decentralization and peer validation in the propagation network. this is something cashies never understood.
this is gonna pump soon, buy this dip