>Back in 2012 bitcoin was an IQ test that most people failed >Now, the Age of Forks is another IQ test and most of this board is failing miserably >04% of this board have it at the right end, and are busy accumulating BSV
I've been swing trading sv like a mofo the past week
Jordan Lopez
Must be difficult when you get lucky once and it gives you a god complex
Tyler Peterson
Amidst building a knowledge trading/broker platform as we speak, don't dispise me for daring to think like a visionary and indulging myself in topics that matter/a future could be build upon.
I cut myself loose from the vicious self fulfilling victim mindstate most of Jow Forums clinches to, a long time ago
Shit man, if you truly think SV is the true bitcoin, we're not the ones who have failed the IQ test
Brayden Ortiz
I support scam forks because they clean out early adopter brainlets who got lucky
Jayden Reed
Based >Proving OP's point It's pretty funny seeing the exact same pattern play out with BSV: every thread is 10% player characters and 90% zero-argument NPCs. If things play out like they did in 2012/2013, the NPCs will disappear into the woodwork as soon as they are proven for the fools they are. There will be no autistic screeching, just a whole bunch of mediocre untermenchen sitting quietly in their corner, wondering WTF happened to them.
Planaria is just an inferior form of smart contracts. Why don't you actually respond to the tech critique instead of just pretending that you're sooo smart?
John Williams
>mfw NPCs think they're "in on it" by accumulating BSV >mfw BCH has the smallest percentage of people hyping and supporting it, meaning that's what the true player characters are accumulating
Incredible stuff, just bought another 20k LINK because I'm so excited. Once the Planaria Systems Programming Interface links with the J.SON Parser hyperLINK framework we're in business. Definitely the biggest bull sign I've seen in a while.
Julian Nguyen
>I shall now make an unsupported assertion and if you don't respond, you must be wrong That's not how this works, brainlet. Explain why smart contracts via a truly programmable PoW blockchain are inferior to whatever garbage you got roped into buying. Go ahead, I'll be here for a while.
David Flores
Most people who were aware of bitcoin rejected it in 2012, you dumbfuck.
Grayson Cox
BSV claims to be infinitely scalable, but it's only scalable as nodes allow it to be. It claims to obsolete the centralized cloud systems, yet the data on the blockchain will overwhelm the total amount of physical system. It is a centralizing shitcoin that only benefits the select few who can afford to create systems to host nodes until they can't.
Connor Howard
Based. And the only thing different this time, there will be no shitcoins to spectulate on.
Liam Thomas
>all this fork bullshit when you can sit comfy in next industrial revolution holding eth laughing at you monkeys
Thomas Cooper
>BSV claims to be infinitely scalable Wrong >It claims to obsolete the centralized cloud systems Also wrong >host nodes until they can't Even more wrong 0/10, strawman harder next time you retard Also: >Completely failing to understand what you are trash-talking Classic NPC behavior >MFW retard-user doesn't understand that frequent forking of a ledger is a sign of robustness and the desirability/entrenchment of the ledger, rather than weakness. If you weren't such a brainlet you would be ashamed, not proud, of the fact that ETH has only forked once. And I say this as someone who holds a massive suicide insurance policy in ETH/ETC left over from 2015.
Maybe you can make that argument today but even in 2019 most people have only heard the name and know literally nothing about how it works lol. That's how most my friends are. My boomer grandparents probably still haven't even heard about it desu. So yeah just because you were lucky enough to hear about it in 2012 doesn't mean everyone else was lol.
Kayden Turner
From Planaria docs: scalability claim >Minimalism: Bitcoin's minimal UTXO data structure makes it THE MOST scalable technology ever. Obsoletes centralized cloud systems claim >All other approaches of trying to store more redundant data will cost more than Bitcoin therefore inferior. And the economies of scale will make sure that one superior open technology will win in the long term. Can you explain me if blockchain have 10000 tb or whatever, how can you host it until you have 10000 tb of hardware to host it? Look, I'm open minded, and I would like to hear a genuine explanation rather than some mexican laughing meme and WRONG XDDD.
Ethan Hernandez
CAN YOU PAID SHILLS STOP PUSHING BS FUCKING V IN EVERY FUCKING THREAD. This shit is getting out of hand. Link 2.0. You're not going to be able to pump your bags.