Singularity is coming soon!

This thread and the massive autistic delusional behavior you can witness from retards or pajeets on Jow Forums constitute a real goldmine if you want to understand why there is so many FUD surrounding Chainlink. Just look at the desperate posts coming from Linkies bagholders who are mostly reaching for hope with their supposed partnerships or project implementations. It turns out the aforementioned companies only talked about smart contracts globally, but the hopeful brainlets automatically associated the term with their pitiful ERC20 overvalued token. I'm not joking, they are unable to provide actual evidence or big names.The rare times when Chainlink's name was actually dropped were insignificant, "what if" possibilities by literal who companies with no weight nor presence in the technology industry. Meaning that the massive adoption of their json parser will never happen - there is a plethora of projects who are actually trying to address and come up with a solution for the oracle problem with dedicated and more competent teams than the two man job we have with Chainlink. At least, I can salute the marketing effort and the memes who are really great and entertaining if you want to have a laugh. Sadly, it's the only value Link will ever have for most people who actually understand the current state of the crypto market.

The only way to arguably make it left in the crypto market is the BTC halvening happening in one year. And even that is not guaranteed, normies won't fall for the trap twice. Still, if you believe, you have approximately two years left to accumulate as much as BTC as possible for what may be the biggest bull run that will be coming.

But yeah, keep believing in your stinky linkies, your double or triple digits, and it will surely happen happen. Link will moon, guaranteed. It's only a matter of time. "Do not underestimate the power of collective thought... $1000 EOY!" soon™

Attached: dancing.gif (224x224, 1.52M)

Most pathetic piece of FUD I've read all day.

This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

By any chance, does anyone know the soundtrack

Listen I genuinely care about about Anons financial well being. Its hard as shit to get ahead in life now, not just working 9-5 for the rest of your life. The sooner you start saving the sooner you can get ahead in life. Chainlink is a meme started by Jow Forums (an infamous trolling board) to lead people to financial ruin. This is NOT A JOKE. Don't let your saved wealth be thrown away over night. Vitalik Buterin the creator of ethereum said himself the days of making x100 or x1000 are over, that right the guy who created the second most popular crypto said himself those days are over. Now Jow Forums is trying to get people to lose even more money after the December/January bloodbath. Smart money already exited the crypto world. Crypto is basically a highly specialized database, companies don't need this. They will just create their own private blockchains. There is no need for crypto chainlink isn't even needed to run the nodes. Think XRP when you think chainlink. The company ripple (smartcontracts) is doing well but the coin XRP(chainlink) isn't even needed for the companies technology. Considering what Vitalik said "The days of making x100 or x1000 returns are over." Chainlink needs a 399900% increase in price over the next couple of months to reach $1000 this is ludicrous. Don't fall for it, chainlink its a meme to fuck you over. Consider this for chainlink at current price to reach $1 you need an increase of 700% or a 233% increase every month until EOY. This is a Jow Forums meme to siphon money out of the hands of the already vulnerable.

Attached: 1552703016322.jpg (762x900, 161K)

Link, eh?
I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons.I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. Jow Forums hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit. Happy gambling though anons.

Attached: Raykt.jpg (226x281, 24K)

OP, I'm also on board. But there is something you must know if you truly seek to attain wealth.
I only have 100k Link which is nowhere near enough to actually make it.

All these Linklets with 10k stacks singing about 1k eoy are starting to piss me off with their propaganda. It was a joke and they are actually believing it and causing FOMO in newfags preventing the dump. I need to make it to 300k before mainnet for fucks sake. Link is only going to $10 max. Right now I might make 1MM before tax on that, but tax will take a big chunk out of that then inflation will fucking ruin me over the next decade.

Even if I chuck the 1MM into a dividend stock that pays out well and I get 70k a year of it, it's not enough to beat inflation unless I basically live in poverty as a neet and keep my wagecuck job in the meantime so I don't have to sell any retirement Link. In 10 years that 70k a year will feel like 20k a year. You need a minimum of 2MM, but more likely 3MM to make it. The upper predictions for Link where about $60 but that was made during the bullrun of last year, and it assumed that the overall crypto market cap would still be expanding and BTC would go on to 1MM a Bitcoin and that we would be in a full blown crypto FOMO hype bubble when mainnet came out and we got our price singularity. All of that isn't going to happen anymore.

The singularity is cancelled. Now we will have a slow growth to $10. And the sad but ironic thing is most people on this board will hold from 20 cents, to $10 and then hold all the way back to sub $1 again because you all believe the 1k eoy memes, and just like the retards who held BTC and didn't sell at 19k, you will do the same with Link at $10. Looking at the current charts depresses the fuck out of me when I know I only have 100k Link, nowhere near enough to make it.

At best I will have 1-2 sweet years, and then return to wagecucking after that. But it will be worse because I will have tasted freedom and know what I am missing out on.

Attached: voice.png (1280x720, 652K)

kek nice try op lol this thread

Honestly I hope moot does the right thing and impliments a Jow Forums exclusive suicide hotline for the salty bagholding link marines once they realize they won't be getting any price action.

indeed he'll need it, but for the nolinkers

Stale pasta literal pajeets. Best fud thread in a long time

Attached: 1552908761668.png (900x1600, 498K)

If you really want your mind to be blown, think about what Thomas Hobbes says in Leviathan. He goes into detail about social contract theory. It all begins with the natural state of man, which is a nasty, short, brutish life. Every man for himself, all against all. Any action is not only permissible, but is also a RIGHT. It's the first time that rights are seriously considered as an inherent quality of man.

Man voluntarily gives up some of his rights to escape from the dangerous and shitty conditions of the natural state of man. It must be mutual, however, he only promises not to kill anyone so long as everyone else agrees not to kill anyone. This is the basis of forming a society.

The important thing here, is that it's a contract. People enter into a mutual agreement, but in order for people to be accountable to that agreement, there needs to be an arbiter, or an enforcer. This is the role that government plays. If a man steals, and he gets caught, then the government enforces punishment against him for breaking the contract. The rules can only be followed if there is an arbiter.

Up until this point in history man has never escaped the necessity of an enforcer for contracts. Enter Sergey Nazarov. His vision is bigger than you can imagine. He's ushering in an entirely new era of human interaction. This can transform any digitally executable contracts. This is the first time in history when a contract won't necessarily need an external enforcer, because the contract itself is the enforcer. The philosophical implications of this are colossal.

Attached: 1514634692179.jpg (299x456, 114K)

Good pasta but he's wrong about the second to last sentence - The contract is not the enforcer - majority consensus between the individuals composing the society itself, brokered via blockchain, is the enforcer of the contract.

>falling for the delphi meme