Want to be a billionaire

>want to be a billionaire
>am not a billionaire
wat do

Attached: 1551654548002.png (500x566, 72K)

Just kill a billionaire and assume his life. Like wear his clothes, do his career, fuck his wife. Pretend nothing is out of the ordinary and no one will question it.

Deep

The talented mr ripley

Become millionaire first

I just read the wikipedia synopsis. I'm glad I didn't watch the movie or read the book just to find out the main character was a fag the whole time.

1.13B takes 47 trades at 30% gain with a starting capital of $5.000. Get educated, move forward despite the fear and anxiety, and be prepared to take hits from everybody including the ones that you love. 3 things, that's it.

be a multi-millionaire in bitcoin/ethereum today. without that your chances are literally zero.

Being a billionaire is having a billion dollars of value or more.
I don't think you want to have a billion dollars, I think you want to spend a billion dollars. For this reason, you won't be a billionaire.

Put a million into Monero. 1% of bitcoin price with about 30% chance of overtaking bitcoin and USD as global reserve currency.

there is a 0% chance feature-tech coins like monero overtake money.

>feature coin argument
>again
Read it this time

sure, fungibility is great, but monero is absolutely not in the right time or place to take advantage of that. you can't just turn another tech-bound altcoin into money, money doesn't work like that. if it did, we'd be switching money every few decades, and that makes it worthless for long term value, which is what bitcoin is, long term money.

given 99.99+% of all transactions of bitcoin will be done outside of the base layer, which is a simple physical requirement, you can simply add fungibility to one of those layers, and get the exact same level of privacy (actually better due to much larger volume) as monero. base-layer privacy means literally nothing when all transactions are kept within the same layer. nobody complains about monero not being private when you convert it to btc/fiat to pay for something.

and besides, the "big boy" money is already squarely in bitcoin, and on-chain privacy improvements are a requirement for scaling in the first place, so they will have to arrive sooner or later, independent to layered scaling.

fact is, regardless of what bitcoin is doing, monero has significantly fundamental flaws that makes it a poor choice for day to day usage, and as a result, will never reach any kind of critical mass where anybody would trust storing large amounts of money in it long term.

add to the fact that monero is a ghostchain with barely any tx and not even used in dn markets lol.

What the fuck you retard 1990 was 29 years ago not 67

>you can't just turn another tech-bound altcoin into money
I don't understand this position. Monero isn't tech bound. It changes its tech as new tech emerges, to make it as close as possible to digital money. Bitcoin is tech bound. It seems impossible to get consensus to change any aspect of the tech. Your first paragraph seems like an argument for monero. I'll also note that in no way would Monero overtaking bitcoin be "switching money". Like I was saying in that other post, until bitcoin overtakes USD, it's still all up for grabs.

>99.99+% of all transactions of bitcoin will be done outside of the base layer
That's fine if you're including IOT and micro txs but if the average person wouldn't be able to open a lighting channel or buy a house on chain then it's hardly decentralised money that you control. "Be your own bank" rhetoric is already shifting to things like Saifedean's "there will more banks and freer bank competition". Hardly a revolution.

>nobody complains about monero not being private when you convert it to btc/fiat to pay for something
That's my point. It's the same with bitcoin and relatively speaking, bitcoin is just as far from becoming a standalone currency as monero is.

>the "big boy" money is already squarely in bitcoin
There are large amounts of money in bitcoin but not the as large as the amounts I'm thinking of.

>on-chain privacy improvements are a requirement for scaling in the first place
This is bitcoins best hope in my eyes. I intend to learn more about these so I can really think about how it could play out.

>monero has significantly fundamental flaws that makes it a poor choice for day to day usage
I disagree.

>and as a result, will never reach any kind of critical mass where anybody would trust storing large amounts of money in it long term.
I don't see why extra effort for day to day use would make it less trustworthy for long term storage. I'd be far more wary storing large amounts on a public chain where many people constantly monitor large addresses and the alternative is tricky, expensive and risky methods of obfuscation.

Monero is used in DNMs although bitcoin is still bigger there. The fact is that fiat is still the name of the game even in drug markets. Fiat is bitcoins best tumbler and Bitcoin becomes a very different and dystopian coin when it is a self contained system without the massive in and outflows of fiat that currently exist.

The last time I checked the 3 occupations that mint the most billionaires (China, India, Europe and America) are tech, hedge funds and private equities.
So that involves
>inventing something the market wants
>coming up with an investment strategy that will draw investors
>good luck doing PE without connections

funny twitch frog poster

>without (((connections)))