LOL. BSV is getting spam attacked

Guess they regret the push for unlimited blocks now. How long untill the chain collaps?

Attached: Capture.png (1244x653, 76K)

HAHA it don't seem to be slowing down. kek.

What I don't understand is how could they not see this would happen?

I mean, even a 6 year old could tell them this would lead to poison blocks and heavy bloating. Get rekt!

Attached: Capture.png (1262x559, 63K)

Piece of shit blockchain lmao

how exactly does the attack work?

Attached: 1501062835483.png (610x738, 422K)

Someone is spamming the chain with useless data to bloat the blocks. People have warned about this for a long time, but the curry coders Sanjey's Vision are too stupid to understand

Attached: 1550087769296.jpg (2528x1664, 1.68M)

Bloatchain technology.

They are just showing off they can mine 128mb block to have something to write on their desert Twitter, it's literally free for them to spam transactions, basically CSW and Ayre control the entire supply and they are the only miners collecting back the transaction fees.

So what does this actually do to the chain? Just slow response time or can it "break"?

It only makes the chain stronger. People don't understand what's happening. Craig is litterly giving it energy.

it wastes gigabytes of space on every machine running a full node

don't worry, i'm sure satoj has a patent for this, and will sue the spammer for copyright violation

This can go on for weeks and months. The SV chain could end up being multiple PETABYTES. At which point the average person couldn't run it. It will become a centralised database. Which is the exact opposite of the core Bitcoin idea.

Nice one you Aussie retard.

don't worry, he'll file a patent before it becomes a problem

>Someone
It's not attackers, it's CSW, no fucking one would spend transaction fees for this bullshit.
CSW/Ayre own most of the hashrate, so they get back transaction fees and it's literally free for them to do this kind of demo.

>It only makes the chain stronger.
No it only makes the chain bloated and centralised.

Daily reminder that BSV is not cash but an illegal storage token.
No one would ever even think to store legal data on a blockchain, since it's expensive, slow to fetch, and in one word, retarded.
To store data you can use cheaper services, dropbox, google drive, mega, all the amazon shits and they are infinitely superior in term of usability, speed and features. They have versioning, autosync and all the perks.

kek

no blocksize deosn't make any chain stronger hashrate does. and sv hashrate is like under the saddest frogs ass.

it looks like the attackers unironically managed to breake the chain. 40 min since last block now. Guess propagation is not possible with bloated blocks. Who would have thought? lol

the saddest thing about sv is it has one or two digit transaction count unless someone is spamming it.

I'm listening to Tales from the Crypt right now and they're talking about how someone should attack BSV. I unironically think a listener of this show who has some money to blow said fuck it and is messing with the chain

>know theres CP on your chain
>flood it with petabytes of data so realistically nobody can download the entire thing
heh

you fags dont even know

well actually any full node can just trim the fuck out of it and filter out and keep the content not publicly available via indexing services.

BTC went six hours the other day.

I've made thousands of TX on BSV. You can do a lot of cool stuff with it.

>I've made thousands of TX on BSV
so the user count is actually lower than 3... i see.

EVERYBODY POST TO BISTAGRAM LETS CRASH THIS CHAIN WITH NO SURVIVORS

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-03-26 at 2.37.25 PM.jpg (928x953, 114K)

SOMEBODY UPLOAD THE NEW ZEALAND VIDEO

People are clueless

>indexing services
so why not using a simple relational db?
you want to delete cp?
delete query and it's gone forever
tell me what is the point of storing data in a blockchain?
this is seriously retarded

epic pun, haha. you should have your own comedy show or something!

Attached: 1547888088851.jpg (640x640, 36K)

actually he has patented spam years ago and is right now suing the spammer

LISTEN EVERYONE

you can go to memo.sv and make a few posts for free even if you dont have any sanjays vision. and get this EVERY POST GOES ONTO THE BLOCK CHAIN FOREVER

if enough anons spam a bunch of posts we can bury this chain for ever

Attached: andreas.jpg (960x1280, 140K)

>tell me what is the point of storing data in a blockchain?
dunno man, it's an anathema to how the internet is. for some stuff like transactions it makes sense sort of. but for general data meh... but the sv cucks think this is the future. it reminds me of mongodb... mongodb took a hundred step backwards and one to the side and it's the "future".

Imagine being so retarded you think the miners making more money at market rates is a bad thing for a coin and then imagine being so obsessed you circle-jerk about your lack of fundamental understanding on Jow Forums.

Attached: boomerpath.png (745x726, 336K)

>The Bitcoin SV blockchain is not a place for
>criminal activity – and if you use it for illegal
>purposes, you will leave a digitally signed
>evidence trail that cannot be erased. We stand
>ready to work with global law enforcement
>authorities to stamp out this and any other illegal
>misuse of Bitcoin.

I mean, even CSW has a lot of irony.
You provide the perfect tool to upload cp, and then you troll the authorities because they cannot enforce anything since BSV is a fork of BTC and BTC is:

pure

expensive

ANARCHY.

Only really good use for huge blocks is to store banned and wrongthink material. otherwise it's retarded though

not only that but creg wrote a 10 page cringe pleading essay on how ownership of a private key is no proof of identity nor proof of past ownership when it was about him signing with the genesis keys.

>banned and wrongthink material
so basically CP

>>etc
calling it an attack doesn't make it an attack

Attached: Grappling Hook.jpg (3260x2180, 1.69M)

saying an attack isn't an attack doesn't stop it from being an attack

>Only really good use for huge blocks is to store banned and wrongthink material
i'm all down for bashing sv but i don't think there is a connection there big blocks does not necessarily equate to storing random shit on a blockchain. it's just specifically sv and a few other retardcoins that are like that.

>user: "hey can i pay you to put this in a block?"
>miner: "ok"
>you: "wow look at that attack"
with constant 100 MB blocks the chain would grow at 14 GB per day. an "attacker" would need to pay miners 140 BSV per day to keep that up.
yeah this "attack" won't last for long.

Attached: The Counter of Time.jpg (1024x1314, 684K)

some btc whales have literally tens of thousands of free sanjays they got from the fork. yes, this can go on for a very long time.

key word is can. it won't. even if it did all it will accomplish is show the world that BSV can do what it promises.

Attached: sea battle.jpg (2067x1400, 878K)

i'm with this cuck on this specific subject spamming the sv chain is only an advertisement to their retarded ways. and it is probably a publicity stunt and also an attempt to distract people from

hey now, words hurt you know.

Attached: harry potter2.jpg (2000x2829, 3.19M)

Attached: 1424807322909.jpg (850x586, 183K)

Muh vishun

How much would it cost an attacker if he was also a miner?

but it's "over" after like 10GB, isn't it.

Attached: 2xdb5i.jpg (500x509, 80K)

WHY IS THIS FUCKING BLOCKCHAIN STILL RUNNING REEEEEEE

YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO SPAM IT TO DEATH YOU FAGGOTS

Attached: roger_wojak.jpg (167x250, 4K)

Except BCH and BSV have been more profitable to mine before, and not once did this cause them to gain majority hashrate. Network effect is strong, friend.

Nothing outside of lost block fees to competitors

Imagine quoting so many people to make an empty point about something that's not even the core argument, imagine, the utter retarded Dunning Kruger effect going on in such an individuals mind.

I hope you're adding a 6th HDD to your RAID array by next weekend, you're going to need it.

>blockchain audited only by (((Datacenters)))
what could go wrong

Attached: craij.png (649x463, 234K)

Except that it happens to Bitcoin too.

>It's not attackers, it's CSW, no fucking one would spend transaction fees for this bullshit.

When it happens to Bitcoin, Bitcoin maximalists blame it on bad actors. When it happens to alts, Bitcoin maximalists blame it on self-sabotage. Fucking schizos.