$0.10

>link wold have trouble with non deterministic computing tasks. but link pool could provide computations for non deterministic tasks if it was running on iexec marketplace.

Could you explain this to a retard
ed please?
Smart contract is deterministic, ok, I get it.
Providing a compunting calculation and then saying ''well the calculation has been made by me, no fake!'' (iExec) isn't it deterministic as well? Why not?
Any example please?

Yeah because it was the only thing that dumped right?

I dont know shit about link but it worries me how much /biz shills the fuck out of it and I see no real progress from the project.

Meanwhile RLC gets called a shitcoin on this board constantly yet has verified partnerships, one of the best teams in crypto, and tangible development results.

Seems like a no brainer where you should be all in if u wanna make it right?

>link wold have trouble with non deterministic computing tasks
The same holds for iExec. PoCo can't halde non deterministic calculations right now.

Actually yes they can, PoCo can be deactivated by provider. Dont know if LINK can do the same

I didn’t know that. According docs.iex.ec you are right.

>Actually yes they can, PoCo can be deactivated by provider
wouldn't this lead to untrustful results? How can a custmer believing in the computation made by the providerr if it doesn't follow the Poco algorithm?

they give No explaination

First Jow Forums browser that admit when he's wrong or didn't know something. May your sould be bleessed

They dont, this is thought for trusted cloud providers (IBM, Google, Alibaba, etc...) , you as a customer can accept a non PoCo task or not. Its not like you dont know it as a customer.

>measuring in $
satoshi is the only thing that matters.

>They dont, this is thought for trusted cloud providers (IBM, Google, Alibaba, etc...) , you as a customer can accept a non PoCo task or not. Its not like you dont know it as a customer.

so a result with Poco or without poco is the same thing? Is it that what are you saying? Then what if some bad actor provides fake results?

Not if you are investing from $ to RLC

If you don't trust an actor, why would you ask for a task without PoCo? You as a customer know which workers are in PoCo and which of them are not, you choose.

There is a market place. So for deterministic tasks you can use ‘untrusted’ (low rep) workers and PoCo, which are probably cheaper than trusted cloud providers you would use for non deterministic tasks.

Friends, I only have 5300...

Will it be enough if I hold until 2022 or even 2023?
Probably not, right?

How big is the marketcap of cloud computing again?

Just remember to sell it before the release. When all the people are buying in close to release, then I will sell my fat stack. Then you buy in again after the dump.

500b by 2021. But my bet is it's going to grow exponentialy for the next 10/15 years

Remember when it x2 in hours after Gilles speech in V2? Not selling before news. Some big shit will be released on V3 speech and it'll x2 or x3 again

>If you don't trust an actor, why would you ask for a task without PoCo? You as a customer know which workers are in PoCo and which of them are not, you choose.

We were talking about the differences between Link and iExec, and you told me that iExec has the advantage of non deterministic computation if it removed poco from the equation
But this is not an adavantage, because sure you can remove poco, but it won't be the same thing as if results were delivered with poco

Basically where would it be then the adv over Link?

>Sorry, I don't care enough about LINK to do any research into it
absolute brainlet

>If you don't trust an actor, why would you ask for a task without PoCo? You as a customer know which workers are in PoCo and which of them are not, you choose.

We were talking about the differences between Link and iExec, and you told me that iExec has the advantage of non deterministic computation if it removed poco from the equation
But this is not an adavantage, because sure you can remove poco, but it won't be the same thing as if results were delivered with poco

Basically where would it be then the adv over Link?

Not everyone here does math with USD.
Satoshi is my base currency.

INTP IQ160

buy this

Been eyeing this since winter even owned 3500 at some point, do companies really have to buy it to use?

based, no reason for this piece of shit when we have link

Can someone please answer me why linkshits have to shit up every thread with their retarded non arguments?

Sorry no fud no shill here but if big company can be trusted and therefore tasks run without Poco, why these big companies would stack rlc?

They will not in that case. Customers may require PoCo and % of ON time that can only be done using PoCo

Its a free marketplace so usage will determine the price. With 5G and smartcities my guess is that PoCo will be required for 100% security of the result

Also, iExec can do fog computing and LINK can't from what I understand.
Can link power dApps? I don't think it can.
From my quick research, LINK can't do anything at all yet.
Also, iExec can monetize data sets now.
There are many advantages and nuances that iExec has over LINK. Also first mover advantage will be iExec's.

I will repeat myself.
You are an absolute retard if you do not buy a bag or at least do SOME research.

How would it be profitable to mine through iexec? The fact that there is a middleman means that it's always more proftable for the server to just mine by himself.

dapps are a meme, as is fag computing

I like RLC, nice slow and steady gains.

Attached: 5adfc89059ef82df88486c96685304bf.jpg (2717x2448, 921K)

Because instead of dealing with the incredible costs of running and maintaining a larger mining operation and putting down upfront costs, maintaining costs, etc, you can just do a pay-per-task model and pay as you go. This allows for different approaches due to fluctuating costs around the world, and allows for smaller players to take part without all of the technical hurdles.

Also, it would make things interesting if(when) farms could compete against eachother in a secure marketplace. iExec allows this.

I'm probably missing on something in my details of why this is an interesting and possibly massive advancement in the space because it's late and I'm tired.

Mining requires betting your shitcoin will be more valuable in the future. Offering mining through RLC you collect the gains no matter the shitcoin or if your mining is successful.

Also starting a mining operation is a HUGE upfront risk. iExec essentially eliminates this risk completely.

5k iexecer here, very bullish on what this'll be worth in 2022.

5k is suicide bag territory, you'll be ok. By 2021 this coin will be top 10.

Okay, I didn't consider upfront investment.
Your first statement doesn't make sense unless you have no cash. Betting that a coin will be more valuable in the future is also a thing with buying; it's not exclusive to mining. And it's often more profitable to just buy the coin instead of mining it.

I'm sceptical for a v3 pump. RLC never pumped for real, despite all of the great news. Daily reminder that v3 may not be enough for its first real pump, and we might have to wait for v4.
The iexec slack got a recent influx of newbs coming in to discuss rlc price and charts when it's actually a place to discuss the project. I think it's starting to enter the radar of a broader audience.

I think waiting for new versions/news for iexec pumps is the wrong way of thinking about it.

I see iExec as one of those "well I didn't expect that" sort of thing. One day it'll probably pump extremely hard, garnering a ton of attention and mainstream media attention. It's pretty fucking relatively unknown at this point and it blows my mind.

As a investor I would rather mine it so goverments don't know how much I own. Having someone else to mine for you will be a thing when V4 comes.

Definitely another advantage. It would become sort of a way to "buy" certain cryptos anonymously through buying RLC first.

behold the chad folio

Attached: rl_clink.png (998x500, 407K)

I think it's even more Chad to go all in RLC because it's probably going to 5x before Link does, then put some profits into link.

This is the shittiest project in all of crypto with the most obnoxious shills. I would even buy XRP before this garbage.

STFU pajeet shoo shoo lame boy go poo in your street