Are these Dutch Chads for real or wtf is this?
Redpill please.
Why are kids larping this moonshot?
Xavier Bell
Isaiah Reyes
beautiful artistic pose
must take a lot of practice to perfect such a move
Ethan Flores
All women are whores.
Sebastian Taylor
>stretch marks
yike
Adam White
Where the fuck do you see stretch marks, user...
This one is still in her fertile prime.
Gavin Sanchez
Jace Sanders
Listen up frens, this isn't shilling or pajeeting or some shit, I legit think this will go to 30 million $ mc easily.
reddit.space.insert();
Hear me out, LTO went to 10 million $ mc, but LTO has 160 million coins on mainnet waiting to be converted to ERC 20 at anytime, so that's like holding your token on a hardware wallet or something, it should be counted as circulating supply, let's substract 30% troll bridge and we end up with 112 million ERC 20, this made the market cap at ATH at >3*10m$ = 30 million $
Now, LTO had a cheaper ICO, which would have motivated ICO investors to sell despite the troll bridge burn, that's what I believe caused the crash, and when I mentioned this in their tg that faggot Ivan banned me without a warning.
LTO saw two important pumps, one was when it was listed on CMC, the second pump was when they announced that a big part of the 450 million total supply will be burned and another part locked for years...
I believe the same will happen with VIDT, it will moon hard to 10 million $ when listed on CMC, then it will climb to 20 million $ after blockchain brad does an interview with the team and some suppofag or ian balina shilling. then the fomo will take it to potentialy 30 million $, this will happen over the course of a month max, the bear market is over, the bottom was when quant and chx were chilling at 0 and everyone was full of despair and never even thought about making money in the bear (except holo which many of us missed and attributed it to chance).
This is a project you can't fud, the only fud (will be dangerous later) is the fact companies pay in USD so if 1 verification costs 0.01$ and 1 vidt = 1$, then the company will use 0.01 VIDT to verify the document, but the token burns and market buys every quarter (happened a few days ago end of march) will paint green candles, plus the speculation revolves around the day when there are not enough tokens reserved for clients and the team starts buyins from the neets.
Leo Powell
The difference between VIDT and LTO is that VIDT is a lot less fuddable than LTO, LTO has the supply fud and the cheap ICO, and it managed to climb to what I believe was 30 million $ (unless someone proves my reasoning wrong), VIDT now has LTO as a partner, they send vidt token with every fucking LTO transaction, it has big as fuck clients, and now has LTO's clients, is GDPR compliant, etc. This is (no pajeeting) adoption happening, they're using the blockchain technology to solve a problem, companies care about this shit, 1 they want to appear as technologically progressive because they use the blockchain, 2 they do have that problem of document transparency.
I'm a top 15 holder, so it's in my interest to shill it, but in all seriousness, it is the best project out there if you compare risk with potential ROI. I'm a die hard linky and this shit has more chance to x100 than link right now (300 million $ mc vs 20 billion $ for link) (talking about bear market now a bullrun and a working chainlink mainnet, that's 1000$eoy stuff and out of scope here)
its not from me, just copy paste
but its true
John Ramirez
Can a shill please explain why you need the blockchain for this? You can already prove a document has not been tampered with using SHA
Zachary Harris
risky art