My main concern is security

My main concern is security.

Blocking the whole network with spam transactions at this moment would only cost a few thousand dollars per hour. This has to be fixed.

Bloating the ledger with spam accounts(which cant be pruned btw.) is a huge concern of mine. I think a minimum amount of Nano like Ripples system will be mandatory in the future.

The centralized voting power has to be fixed. At this moment the whole network could be shut down by simply DDOSing a dozen of adresses.
Without a central blockchain its also easier to trick a node into a false ledger when it's out of sync.

Attached: nano.png (711x418, 59K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=pu5-Zji-uv8
github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/milestones
github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/search?q=subscription&unscoped_q=subscription
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

It's a free lunch coin. None of your concerns will ever be fixed. Only a plebbitor would be stupid enough to invest in this shit. Dump it.

Attached: 1524987360738.jpg (932x381, 39K)

youtube.com/watch?v=pu5-Zji-uv8

dynamic pow, inbred

plebbitors is the main reason you should actually have a part of your portfolio invested in nano.

Huge bbc
Huge black cock
Giant nigger dick cum daddy

the spam issues are getting fixed in the next two releases here github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/milestones

You can't really ddos addresses I don't know what you mean.

"We are currently implementing a subscription model where services pre-purchases a bundle of credits, such that each work requested costs them one credit. These funds will be then distributed to the workers regularly. This is still in testing and in the future we plan to explore a free community model. The cost to use the dPoW system is significantly cheaper then a service running its own work server."

THEY ARE TRYING TO ADD INCENTIVES NOW LOL

Yes very good coin sir it get hacked and lose 13% of supply yes very good sir please buy to make babu’s proud thank you have great day

>We are currently implementing a subscription model where services pre-purchases a bundle of credits, such that each work requested costs them one credit. These funds will be then distributed to the workers regularly. This is still in testing and in the future we plan to explore a free community model. The cost to use the dPoW system is significantly cheaper then a service running its own work server

Source?

github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/milestones

They completely gave up and decided to follow the path that Bitcoin started 10 years ago. What a complete and utter fucking failure of a project.

that just links to upgrade progress.....

>github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/milestones

Can you provide a direct link? All I see is the work they have been doing throughout the entire bear market. There is a lot of it.

I have heard no mention of a fee based model, outside of dynamic proof of work, which taxes electricity at an increasing rate when the sender is spamming the network.

damp eet

This is the next x100 and anyone who doesn't see it yet will bite his ass. Its so obvious.

You are correct, not sure what the other guy is going on about

I searched for 'subscription' in the github and all I came up with was this: github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/search?q=subscription&unscoped_q=subscription

Kek

IOTA will have the same fate
rely on a public cryptochain

hes making things up see

Nano will one day unironically be worth $300 per token. At LEAST. I could see it hitting $1000 per token.