So i have family friend in capital management and he said they are all going all in on 5G. part of me wants to invest in some of the 5g related stocks, but the Jow Forums in me is saying its a conspiracy against humanity to weaken our DNA.
Does this mean im growing up? that for the first time im putting my financial welfare over my conspiracy outlook of the world?
Yeah, what stocks are you looking at also if against 5g like I doesn’t mean I have to use it
>I don’t have to use it but it will be on every light pole in my neighborhood affecting my health every second of every day
absolute idiot
Are there any studies to support this? Also who's to say this didn't already start with 4g?
Also yes, to me this world we live in has changed for the worse. I am getting old.
5g is terrible for humans and is a Jewish weapon to weaken and spy on goyim there is no doubt about it.
That being said you still have to do things that are good for you and your family. If profiting off this will maybe one day give you an edge over your enemies then do it. It’s really no different then investing in (((cryptocurrencies))). The main thing is what you do with your newly found wealth to undermine their evil plans and genocide against us.
Here's the ultimate 4d chess plan
>invest in 5g stocks
>throw all your fucking money into it
>become fuck you rich
>lobby politicians to pass legislation prohibiting 5g
>you now have money and have reduced cancer rates
Why invest in 5G when I can invest in 6G.
see there is no escaping it once the networks are set up. I live in los angeles and its been one of 3 test pilot cities and ive already seen them installing the 5g towers in my neighborhood.
They started putting the first 5g boxes on fire stations and the guys started getting sick and many fire stations have already banned 5g towers from being placed on the roofs of their facilities. but i havnt actually seen the studies but Brussels belgium just became the first major city to ban it completely so thats not a good sign.
thanks user, this has been how i have been thinking for the most part. if my family friend who works on wallstreet is saying this is the next big thing then i should take advantage of this knowledge. If you have heard anything of the "4th industrial revolution" its completely going to be powered by 5g.
based
lol because 5g is going to roll out nation wide in 2020, i need my money asap not in 10-15 years.
Alright anons, I've seen all the videos on YT explaining how terrible 5G is for humans, the Jow Forums in me thinks they are going to mass exodus most of the population (The ones who have been most affected by chem trails, if you've seen the video connecting chemtrails and 5G you'll know what I'm talking about), so my question is, WHERE can I move to where the health effects will be reduced drastically? Do I have to move far far away from humanity? I don't want to leave the US and move to fucking sharia brussels to escape 5G, somewhere has to know somewhere to move to protect ourselves against this. 5G really is fucking terrible for us, 4G is bad enough. Where are we going lads?
5g is only a supplememt to 4g.
5g as it is portrayed today is totally overhyped by the media.
it has serious downsides and
will not replace any prior tech.
you need a direct line of sight for 5g.
it is unable to penetrate through already thin walls.
it has in general very short range.
it has low latency and ultra thick bandwith but as laid out above that comes as a cost.
4g will indefinitly be the standard you want. it has the optimum mix between bandwith,range, latency, obsticle penetration to feed you at "relative ease" with everything you need to do on a mobile device (eg text,audio,video).
don't go all in on 5g, it's not a killer.
remember also most people are just fine with 100-200kb/s, the use cases for close range 5-10mb/s are there but they are small in numbers compared to the average default user.
t. experienced electrical engineer / it project manager
also 5g is harmless and not a
danger to health as it's Electromagnetic waves. fucking up your health would be alpha/beta/gamma rays that occur at nuclear decay/separation/fission. EM is harmless. You could sleep directly next to an 5G tower you would not notice any impact. Yes: There's more energy in 5g waves as in 4/3/2g waves as the frequency is higher but overall it's still so low it doesnt even come close to the level of a microwave to be remotely seen tangible.
there's plenty of uneducated plebs and idiots with tinfoil hats out there who have zero clue on all this that think these towers are producing their headache and not the 3x BigMacs they just ate.
from someone who is into STEM these people appear like retarded flat earthers.
never underestimate that there's a huge chunk of very stupid people who are unable to do the science or even listen to it cause it's hard and unpleasant to think straight (eg democrat voters, greens, leftists, children, women, etc)
interesting perspective, thanks that actually is the most reasonable comment ive ever heard about 5g. Most people are totally polarized one way or the other.
im just going off info from a family friend who works in a capital investment firm on wallstreet. its someone i trust, but they said this is the biggest thing everyone on wallstreet is betting on for the short term future.
based and science pilled
there's very little actual need for 5g.
what people actually need and want is COVERAGE. meaning you can go anywhere and you have always good reception. for that 4g is better suited cause you need only 1/3 the amount of towers than you would need with 4g + penetration of walls.
most arguments for 5g are "future applications" like connected cars that communicate with each other.
dont underestimate that
most people have absolutly no clue on how much data this would need (!!!). the imagination of the average politician or salesman without tech background is that there would need to huge datatransfers. the reality would be that it's around 8-12kb/s per car (propably even less than that). thats currenly the amount each player eg on a csgo server needs. scale that up to 1000 cars stuck in a traffic jam in a dense area as a worst case and you're at 12mb/s which can be cut down by employing broadcasting protocols and other optimizations to ~5-6mb/s. 4g can handle that and latency would be still ok.
point i wanna make is: there's not that big of a need for 5g. the mainstream perception produced by the fake
media is: 5g = more coverage (which is wrong in most cases and right in very few: you would put a new 5g tower next to an existing 4g and not in an area that has no previous coverage at all. so in princie coverage will not increase with 5g.).
don't believe the hype. there's likely an entry enthusiams on the market but most people will figure over time that they don't need the expensive 5g contracts where the cheaper 4g ones are already sufficient.
>unable to do the science or even listen to it cause it's hard and unpleasant to think straight (eg democrat voters, greens, leftists, children, women, etc)
incredibly based
I work at Keysight Technologies, stock has been slowly increasing over the last year or so. We heavily are investing in producing 5G, take a look at it user
Know of any companies listed on the ASX that are working on 5g by any chance? Know it might not be your exchange.
>EM is harmelss
Yeah this. A strong 4g signal can get 30+ mb download speeds. If it was cheaper with better coverage it's fast enough to just replace broadband. That's a better goal than fucking 5g memes.
T- used 4g as my main internet in Asia some places getting 45mb download in a fucking third world country.
Hence why they'll put countless small cell boxes everywhere
>give you an edge over your enemies then do it
this desu art of war.
isn't the main use case for 5g in office/commercial setting? IoT, AI, that type of scheiße
>but i havnt actually seen the studies
So you are a fucking nutcase
t. kike
They might combine 5G with the substances sprayed in chemtrails to affect human bodies.
It would affect their physiology and psychology. Make them weak, sick, or depressed, angry, disoriented.
It's a tool to finally control the cattle.
I'm really sick of central governments, and i hope that with P2P networks (connected with optical fibre...) we get rid of them.
It could happen very fast, only 10-15 years.
What companies to target for my family's portfolio desu? I'm all aboard the 5G train. Ericcson, Nokia, and Qualcom seem okay.
verizon, skyworks solutions, corning inc.... those are just a few i have found myself through searching. My family friend didnt tell me and specific companies just that 5g was their absolute main bet for the short term.
i asked him about bitcoin/crypto and he said he thinks the technology is definitely the future but wasnt as bullish on it in the short term as he was for 5g.
Thanks fren. Will do more research today
t. schizo
kys faggots, you're already trying to make money off chainlink, which will bring forth the era of the robots to enslave us all, you all keep talking about sex robots, and now 5G? wtf is wrong with you, you're literal jews frens.
not buying any link or 5g stocks or sex robots, I invest my money in shrimp farming and other god allowed businesses, I also don't do usury, so I sleep happy at night, you faggots are all depressed and use drugs, and watch porn, and you all deserve it
Wow speak for yourself you delusional linkie
Nice "science understanding" you have there. X-rays and gamma rays are also electromagnetic radiation.
lol...i wouldnt touch chainlink with a ten foot pole you dipshit.... also on no fap. Im a happy Chad European that sleeps like a baby.
Are you niggers fucking dumb? This thread is litteraly sub zero IQ.
You niggers are like Karen2.0, telling me to shut down my wifi because it harms her little nigger child. 5G CANT harm you.
This world needs a second australia, where we can put all retards who believe in chemtrails, 5g being harmful or any of that degen shit.
>investing in 6g duuuuuuurgh grug smart
T. rabbi Shekelberg
Holo plans to increase bandwidth too, along with internet. Something like this with 4g would probably be good but we will see in next year or two.
The Jow Forums in you is a schizoposting idiot
Bad idea
>there is no escaping it once the networks are set up
I live in the country though user =) nearest cell tower is miles away
the fact of the matter is that EMR has already been labelled carcinogenic by the WHO. there are no longterm studies and most of the studies that claim EMR is harmless are sponsored by the telecom industry. fact is nobody knows what this shit is gonna do to us longterm and frankly I find it terryfying that Im being blasted with radiation 24/7 from WIFI, cell phone towers and soon even 5G. I dont need any of this shit and woudl be happy to use ethernet cables and good old corded phones but as a consumer nobody is even asking me. insect population has been dropping off a cliff ever since they rollout out mobile networks and the levels of brain cancer, depression and allergies have skyrocketed. I hope to God this shit is as "safe" as the telco industry wants you to believe but as a consumer I would at least like to have a choice whether or not I want to be exposed to this radiation 24/7 and the white spots on maps get smaller and smaller. some scientists say the radiation effects could be cumulative and that a big percentage of the population is already suffering from harmful effects without even realizing it. and dont give me this bullshit about ionizing vs non-ionizing radiation its complete bullshit and I can pull up the studies that show this argument is a hoax.
>t. will probably have to live in an underground bunker if this shit turns out to be harming.