For the doubters

What would it take for LINK to be $1000?

1) SWIFT made 2bn pmt msgs p/a in the mid 2000s = 8 million msgs per business day. (Source: fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/Appendix_D.pdf)

2) SWIFT transactions added = US$5 T p/day in the mid 2000s. (Same source).

3) SWIFT made 15mm pmt msgs daily on avg in '18 (Source: swift.com/about-us/swift-fin-traffic-figures/monthly-figures)

4) We can see the avg SWIFT transaction in the mid 2000s was 5000 [bn US$ transacted per day] / 0.008 [bn transactions per day] = 625k US$ per transaction. ON AVG.

5) Interbank transactions cost approx 1.5% in fees when transacting 100k us$. Let's say it's a fixed 150 dollars, just to be conservative, so let's assume even those 625k transactions cost 150 bucks to carry out.

6) This means that today, a conservative estimate for the payment market is 150 (us$ cost per transaction) * 15 million (transactions per day) * 250 (business days in a year) annually which is 562.5bn us$. Let's say 560. Very conservative because we considered a fixed cost and only SWIFT *payments*. Not other operators, and not SWIFT securities transactions which are also huge.

7) There will be 1bn link tokens in circulation. Let's assume all tokens will be staked on nodes, generating passive income. Therefore the value of each token will depend on how much dividend they produce each year, like any fixed income asset.

8) Assuming link's risk profile isn't particularly low, a return rate of 7% p/a wouldn't be out of the ordinary.

9) Thus, in order for each LINK token to be worth 1k, each one needs to generate 7% (us$70) p/year. So US$70 * 1bn tokens => Chainlink needs to capture a 70bn market participation.

10) 70/560 = 0.125. In order for LINK to be worth 1k, it needs to capture 12.5% of SWIFT's PAYMENT MARKET. The real market also includes other operators, and also securities transactions NOT INCLUDED IN THIS CALCULATION. Chainlink's real target in order to reach 1k is more like 6% of the market.

t. [redacted]

Attached: 1524850877472.png (1048x1034, 892K)

Other urls found in this thread:

swift.com/about-us/swift-fin-traffic-figures/monthly-figures?
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>there is only one user you can trust to bring you real news.

Attached: myroyalboodwah.jpg (2048x1536, 450K)

>1.5% in fees when transacting 100k us$. Let's say it's a fixed 150 dollars
You're off by an order of magnitude

enjoy a brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrap calcanon

Attached: bb234234.png (716x892, 781K)

Damn it, yes. A typo. I meant 0.15%

The rest still stands because I used the us$150 figure, not the 0.15% or 1.5%.

Link is shit

No worries

Attached: 1519465354613.jpg (800x905, 145K)

Holy fuck cringelord.

First of all, why would all the transactions made by swift needs a decentralized oracle answer.

Second look at Ethereum how many transaction per second it can process. Hurrdurr muh blockchain independent. Well have you already tought about if the nodes are blockchain independent ? How you get paid if you run on Hyperledger?

Third banks could simply copy Chainlink. And run nodes with already known and trusted dataproviders. You know providers you could keep liable in case of wrong data.

For fuck sake do you really think that some sweaty nerds will get rich by simply buying access to an already known datasource and running an node. You will bring anything new to table?

The

D E L U D E D
E
L
U
D
E
D

Attached: 1550272115727.jpg (500x322, 30K)

Link is lit

>imagine if we just get 1% of 1% of the total transactions! We’ll be billionaires!

Doing shit like this is a clear indicator you’re a college kid who has never run a business or accomplished anything in terms of financial success.