*makes Jow Forums seethe*

*makes Jow Forums seethe*

Attached: based.jpg (840x485, 223K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=5SJm2ep3X_M
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Literally who

that is roger
he is pretty cool

*makes Jow Forums ultra seethe*

Attached: ultra based.jpg (1080x690, 22K)

rogers a great guy, driven by principles but somewhat misguided. on the other hand craig's a humungous faggot driven by a lust for bbc. wouldn't buy bitcoin cash or bitcoin cash sv in a million years though.

that is alcoholic degenerate craig
he is literally hitler

I don't know about SV but Bitcoin cash is pretty based. You ever use it? The fees are even lower than litecoin.

don't get me wrong bitcoin cash is pretty cool but i've never had a reason to use it. aren't the fees lower because the mempool is empty anyway?

no the fees are lower because the blocksize is bigger and therefore the network isnt as clogged. back when bitcoin cash was still hovering around number 2 and 3, and litecoin was 10 or 11, it was STILL cheaper than litecoin. pretty amazing, I paid like 1/20th of 1 cent to send hundreds of dollars

i have no BCH too but rogger has very smart approach
he insist on "gabling" games, in reality it is stunt to anonimise and launder coins, it is a mixer
so you end up with already integrated BCH that is effective vehicle for laundering money without advertising it as such
BCH is the next moonshot

he is cregs mini-me it was the most expensive gay divorce in history when they broke up

Bch could have the same fees with btcs volume and then a lot more.

no it wont
fees only go up if the blocks are full
BCH will increase the block size as they have a stated goal to be a currency

bitcoin needs 4 gigabyte blocks or bigger to scale as a worldwide payment system on layer 1. that is what btc devs meant as unsustainable not 8 and 16 mb blocks.

> aren't the fees lower because the mempool is empty anyway
yep, and with the scaling direction they've taken, it will always be empty, even if spammers arise.
I'd wait for a good entry (it just mooned so probably in a month or so) and stack up before Avalanche hits the main net, then it would be suited for a global currency. 0conf basically replaced by 1 second confirmations...

oh and that would be 210 terrabytes storeage per year and 14 exabytes of traffic

youtube.com/watch?v=5SJm2ep3X_M

1gb blocks were already sustainable with average hardware a couple of years ago. With 5g networks available 4gb blocks will be in the same position.
It was never about 4gb blocks being unsustainable for core, it was the need for VC capital to solve problems that don't need to be there in the first place, which is why they wouldn't even double the block size and they DELIBERATELY slowed down development of next-gen optimization such as xthinner compression and Graphene.
Yes, 1GB blocks don't work on the BTC network, but with uncrippled development, they would pretty well on BCH (if those optimisations are actively used).

Yeah. I'm saying fees on bch would remain how they are now with btcs volume plus more.

blockchain pruning and now you don't need the storage
as for the traffic it is literally nothing
it is all so easy, we have teams of 1, 2, 5 people that can do it and do do it

graphene is supposed to be 10x more efficient thats still fucking bad for ghe internet you still need the storeage in every full node altho bcash can go the heavy pruning route reducing it to a few terrabytes

I think the largest hurdle for miners is bandwidth, not storage. Storage is cheap af.

bandwidth
you are sending text messages
like 1 line stings
one second of streaming has multiple millions more data

So storage is a bigger hurdle?

none of it is any hurdle
there will be more of orphan blocks if the blocktime is less than 5 minutes
you could introduce reward for orphans too, like in ETH

>bitcoin needs 4 gigabyte blocks or bigger
technology always gets bigger boyo

block propagation is more like everyone is sending each others 400 byte messages around many times each one whil cash only has like 500 users this is fine try it wigh a few 100k nodes!

not when it comes to that size of a blockchai and utxo set

btw what happened with wormhole?

torrents do it all the time, it is peer to peer brainlet
you upload to 8 near nodes and they do the same

Attached: 1555000173313.jpg (1200x1000, 464K)

no with torrent there is no 1 chain everyone needs to sync but many many file small groups of people are interested in.

>none of it is any hurdle
Idk if I'd go that far. Technology always has constraints. Doesn't mean we cant progress past them though.

Meh, storage is one of those things we've done very well with. As for wormhole, idk senpai. Not something I paid attention to. I did pay attention to CashShuffle though. Shits dank af and comes with every Electron Cash wallet now.

BSV the retards do 1 GB blocks as we shitpost

Truth be told I like Roger, he is sincere
I don't like Craig

Roger is more likeable but Craig is Satoshi. Stiff

>Craig is Satoshi

wrong. i am satoshi

not words i would use in relation to that pocket sociopath he is like creg only less crazy and possibly actually means well unlike creg who just wants to see the world burn if it cant be his.

This guy makes me so mad! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa

Attached: 1553805942510.jpg (480x480, 46K)

Nice try bcashier but roger and bcash is irrelevant. People only care about craig

Who's craig?

>bcashier
Jow Forumsbitcoin pleb detected
stay seething

tell user, are you storing all existing torrent files in a node?
No?
Because that's exactly what BSV want to do.
Totally retard solution.

To be fair, on technological grounds, why would anyone choose BTC over BCH? BTC has nothing in its roadmap for a long time while BCH will have Schnorr signatures support in only 1 month from now. I'm seriously considering to convert my modest BTC holdings for BCH.

craig is sanjays snek

>blocklet detected

>reddit corecucks hate him
>Jow Forums sanjay's visioners are also triggered
the forkfest turned out literally perfect

/thread
roger is retarded in what he's doing but probably a good guy at heart, sanjay vishnu on the other hand is a typical mentally unstable faggot

have fun with your lack of supply cap when miners get no reward from fees in a few years and hashrate plummets to the floor

>last bitcoin is mined in 2140
>literally millions of tps (we'll say 10mil)
>transactions cost 1/10 penny maybe less
> $10000 a second, 600000 a minute in fees
>mining a block is $6000000
>heh, n-nobody will mine t-that

>>last bitcoin is mined in 2140
so what, the block reward will shrink so much within the next few halvings that it will be meaningless, don't jump out with you 2140BS because it works only on clueless normies.

>literally millions of tps (we'll say 10mil)
yeah, call me when it happens


>> $10000 a second, 600000 a minute in fees
>mining a block is $6000000
>heh, n-nobody will mine t-that

you think you will run a financial revolution based on some shitcoin with 0 security that can be attacked cheaply by anyone?

of course somone will mine that, a few miners and the hashrate will be laughable.
And when normies find out that bcash's inflation is higher than shitty fiat they will never hold that shit for longer than the time required to buy used panties in some japanese vending machine

muh nodes

You sound upset.

makes biz seethe by losing a bet?
his coin is 0.05 BTC

people keep spamming this board talking about him but no one cares except the 3 or 4 people spamming about him

The only one who cares about Craig or Roger is you aka the reddit pleb