CLC shills, could you provide some insight. We know Timo the tranny isn't a scammer but most of the fud is still legit and needs to be addressed seriously if you want to keep healthy ties to the community. Right now you have a lot of atoning to do.
Isn't Honeycomb a single point of failure? Have you negotiated "exclusivity" with the providers or could they just provide per-call rates to competing services? What other products do you envision? A competing staking platform to LP, or something else? Will you be servicing competing oracle networks as they start popping up? How did you talk about this among 18 members and not a single one of you pointed out that the 7m valuation was retarded and would backfire? It's also obvious that 18 co-founders with limited skills and experience is a huge red flag, especially when you're claiming 60% for yourselves. That's 230k per head. I don't believe every member on the team's contribution is worth that much. Meanwhile the actual talent you'll have to hire to actually develop the product will get peanuts. What do the 5 or so R&D members actually do? This is another stark contrast to Jonny, who developed LP mostly by himself. I hope you'll succeed and what you're doing is more important than most realize but you won't succeed unless you make things right with the community. We're harsh critics and that's something you should see as a positive.
Why are there clc fudders acting as shills in a weak ass reverse psychology game? Having a normal breakdown and discussion of this service would be way better than just being dumb
Brody Young
I don’t think really anyone has a problem with their honeycomb service. It’s cool for the ecosystem to have a marketplace to buy data directly from.
I think the FUD stems from the Clc group shilling their token that exsists only to raise 7m in funds.
Owen Nelson
what does this pic have to do with CLC in particular? anyone who has ever built a web/mobile app knows how APIs work and understands that quality data isn't free, but what is the basis for their ludicrous 7MM valuation? you do realize that you could make 3MM+ monthly calls to the CMC API for less than $10k right?
Henry Martin
$10k/year that is
Daniel Turner
If you don't see how paying $10k up front to serve contracts that might not have even been written yet could potentially constitute a barrier to entry, then sure, you might not grasp why they're important
John Walker
Bump
Aiden Anderson
clc are the worst thing to happen to the chainlink community
Bentley Williams
it's not a barrier to entry because it's not paid upfront, it's paid in installments that correlate to the amount of stress your application (or smart contract in this case) causes on their resources, and it is an intentionally designed scaling system so that developers can test the viability of their applications before forking over a whole bunch of dough. but i'm just literal retard with a keyboard so maybe you can explain to me how the services offered by CLC justify a 7MM valuation so that people like myself and can be persuaded out of our present opinion?
Ryder Cook
they need to fire timo and cancel their pointless token sale for a start
Sebastian Morales
i'm in complete agreement with you there
Hudson Parker
>invest in LINK because of the value in disintermediation of middle men / trusted third parties > invest in pathetically low-effort middle man / trusted third party business pick one
Alexander Ortiz
Correct. Basically if they believed that the company was going to be successful, they wouldn't use a token raise. They're expecting retards to subsidise the risk.
friendly reminder that clcg started as a literal discord server with a recruitment thread on biz yikes and cringe I'm not giving these tranny goyim my money
Hudson Kelly
> im just testing how much my smart contract node is stressing your servers whats the big deal the launch of mainnet will be known as The Massacre of the Midwits
David Stewart
but nah they WANT us to succeed they let us test our nodes for FREEEEEE
