Why don't gigantic companies build housing campuses? E.g. Google has billions in cash...

because they would be bankrupt
50,000 x 1 million is um 50B

yeah thats when u realise how insig tech companies are and companies in general

This, think before you post shitlords

People don't want to tie where they live with which company they work for. What if you get fired? Do you get kicked out?

Why don't they do it where it would be affordable? Whyat keeps Nebraska from being the the technological axis of the world?

The happy medium I'd say is 25-30mins from work by motorized transportation be it car or public. Public transportation is actually nice in Japan/Korea besides crowding during the busiest times.

Ports and people

Meaby not bluepilled facebook, but what about tesla?, Could be fun desu.

>hurr durr, electrons and pixels move by ship and airplanes don't real

most tech companies still produce physical product, but you also have the city which has housing and whatever else is needed for daily operations like food and corporate banks

go bring 10,000 people to nowhere and that's 10,000 more houses, more hospitals, police, restaurants etc etc. that is costly for an area that can be a trade hub. see old mining towns

dont give our wagecuck masters ideas user

Attached: 1543803656755.png (805x1199, 1.48M)

but that would mean less profit for management and the CEO

>googleplex

people live there.

>What if you get fired? Do you get kicked out?

This is the situation most people paying rent in America are in.

Not the people at these tech companies earning 400k a year.

Seriously? Not one post about how the most populated cities in the US have their land owned by jews and chinks? The only option would be to build a town in the middle of fucking nowhere and that would take decades to cultivate. And fucking lol at thinking tech companies have decades worth of collateral

You mean shareholders. Ceos and managers are employees.

I always thought about this: offices in big sky-scrapers downtown and having wagies from all the far-flung suburbs is VERY wasteful from financial (you have to compensate wagies for gas, mortgage, insurance, car payments etc etc) and environmental persepective (wagies burn lots of gas in traffic, allocate their salaries to some plastic garbage etc). For example let's say a floor in an office building is 10 feet high. What you do is install bunks with a foot print of 7' x 2' and stack them 3 high. Basically have entire floors dedicated to bunk spaces. Have your workers work and sleep in the same building. This eliminates several problems at once:
- you can have workers do 16 hour work shifts and still get plenty of sleep since they don't have to waste time on commute
- you can easily organize 24/7 operation of your organization by implementing shift system for example have half of the workers in your building do day shift and then the other half do night shift
- you substantially reduce your environmental impact by eliminating the need to commute for your workers
- you substantially reduce the pay rate for your workers since they don't have transportation and housing expenses
- you can negotiate with your local government to have your property taxes reduced since you are not putting lots of strain on the infrastructure by eliminating the need for your workers to commute
Plus if you employ H1b's they would still be happy to work for your company and you wouldn't have to listen to continuous whining if you hired some suburb-dwelling huweights. Fuck I'm smart.

Attached: 57337daedd08957d568b4697-750-562.jpg (750x562, 87K)

The idea of company towns is nothing new. Once you begin housing people you become liable for their living conditions and problems that arise. It is insanely expensive unless it is pure slave dormitory chinese/sea style housing.

The USA is full of ghost towns that were built by companies exploiting certain resources.

Spotted the jew

Only 1/4. Doesn't count.

Attached: 1549895164367.png (757x615, 329K)

Not as efficient as just never letting them out of the wage cage.

>Because it's not financially feasible to house that many people. I don't think you realize how much real estate would be needed, the cost to build, the infrastructure needed, and how much it costs to manage that much housing. It's way more than a few billion.
That's where you're wrong kiddo

Looks good user!

Cant wait for the moment my master designs one of these;

Attached: Screenshot 2019-04-21 at 09.14.24.png (679x496, 298K)

Holy shit, they don't lie when they say people don't learn from history so it's doomed to repeat.

There was this little point of time in history, around the time of the industrial revolution, where the owners of companies had things like on-site housing. They also had on-site stores of various kinds. It all probably started fairly inocuous, but in short order, it quickly got to the point where the only way you could afford things is if you put that money directly back into the company. Some of them even stopped paying people in real money, and instead gave them credits they could only use at company """"businesses"""".
Not only was this system only different from feudalism in name alone, it was also incredibly damaging to anyone else who want to compete in the market. Your option was to own a factory, or operate in a completely different environment. It locked out the introduction of competition pretty much entirely.
This kind of stuff is exactly what prompted workers' rights movements. This is the kind of stuff that motivated Karl Marx. What you're suggesting has already historically proven to lead to nothing more that debt-slavery. You think wage-slaving is bad now? It's only particularly terrible because the same sort of draconian thinking has renters believing their some sort of feudal lord.

I can't believe there are people this woefully uneducated about history that also have access to the internet and claim to know something about business. You've got to be some kind of industry plant.

Attached: 81234723842.jpg (3840x2160, 3.02M)

That's what shit like ICOn is wasting money on

It's only a matter of time, but they aren't going to be nice

thanks for the 411 college history class student fag

It could be that the corporations just facilitate that expansion mainly aimed at their employees, but with time start owning less and less. Or at the least, don't act as if they owned everything. Act as a local government in itself - an intermediary between the employees, and the real government and jew

This is true. But you have to realize communism or a similar derivative idea will eventually win out in the end simply because in any given society the poor are the majority of the population while the rich are a tiny minority. You might say something like HURR USA LE MIDDLE CLASS DURR YUROPOORS but you have to remember that the middle class is an artificial construct that was created in order to combat the threat of communism in the middle of 20th century. Since there's no real visible threat of communism around the elites are hard at work dismantling this construct.

I can already see the future where there is a Google City™, Facebook City™, Amazon City™ each one with their own "Terms and Agreements" aka laws.

Attached: ajpepe.jpg (847x1024, 86K)

What you're describing is feudalism lmfao

Nope

>This kind of stuff is exactly what prompted workers' rights movements. This is the kind of stuff that motivated Karl Marx.

Low IQ peasants being allowed to breed is what prompted "workers rights" movements or more accurately called Jewish Bureaucratic Hijacking movements

Found the aspiring peasant.

If the elite can have 100% non human armies/weapons, then at the end despotism might win. 5 millions humans with guns against 50 million robots/drones. Time is running out.

Attached: 1552789438222.jpg (700x525, 158K)

So?

So?

>Act as a local government in itself - an intermediary between the employees, and the real government and jew

Wow, an authority that protects you from other authorities in exchange for your labor and toil on land owned by your authority. This is revolutionary. Brilliant idea. Japan and Europe never tried that one before.

You basically want to be a slave to Google.

So?

So?
They're fun

Attached: 823472347823.jpg (1280x720, 137K)

*drools*
durr i luv ball
hurrrrrr *brain falls out of head*

Cheap post-soviet panel houses are a really shit example user. These were built for poor people and its not very comfortable to live in them.

Lmao, you probably think that you are very smart user

>These were built for poor people and its not very comfortable to live in them.
So?

These were not for poor people. In East Germany every body wanted to live in the blocks because they were new back then.

Shadowrun becomes real life

why not just let employees work remotely?

because work environments are designed to humiliate you.