Why is it taking so long to solve the the scaleability problem?

Why is it taking so long to solve the the scaleability problem?

Attached: 1555894693867.jpg (1024x819, 89K)

Because its not purely a technological/mathematical problem. It exists at the intersection of technology/game theory/human behavior, and thats a bitch to solve correctly.

Retard! Everything can be solved with technology.

Its unsolvable. Which is why Fantom is a no brainer.

ah yes the erc20

You can't solve a problem that can't be solved. Blockchains are inherently unscalable.

>>unscalable

Attached: IMG_20190418_131634.jpg (498x880, 46K)

Ethereum bagholder spotted.

He means without sacrificing security with centralized solutions like that shitcoin you have bought into, even though it is promoted by a professional scammer.

Attached: forged.jpg (798x1211, 281K)

Its easy for something to work well when its new and doesnt have 10 years of transactions on it

bitcoin is more than 10 years old you absolute retard. It's the BSV ticker that's new

It is solved. It's called Bitcoin(BCH)

(SV is the testnet, 32mb blocks are fine to get us to PayPal level of transactions)

Attached: images (32).jpg (595x515, 33K)

Roger?

>being this stupid

Attached: disgust.jpg (460x259, 22K)

This

For me it's the McChicken

You talking about Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV) and not Bitcoin (BTC). Stop scamming people. Your shitcoin is based around making new people in this space think it's related to real Bitcoin so it's a fucking SCAM just like bcash which it forked from. And I'm not even BTC holder.

because blockchain is a billion times less efficient and worse at scaling than the worst relational databaae

Attached: 1555668411153.jpg (537x640, 153K)

sv is the streetshitter variant

Not an erc20 you fuuuuuuuuuckin faggot.

Is the blockchain really uncrackable?

>he thinks btc is bitcoin
>he doesn't know about segwit

Attached: guxwezb3j6s11.jpg (902x842, 77K)

bitcoin is the only one trustless permissionless publicly audited ledger that is secure. but secure in practical therms yheoretical attacks are well documented segwit just added 1 more

what sort of drooling imbecile you have to be to say that?

BTC is just a fork of Bitcoin. The only reason why it's currently considered the "real Bitcoin" is because the real Bitcoin died with the fork. If BTC died when SV was made, then it'd be considered the "real Bitcoin".

btc is the main fork of bitcoin yes

here is what i want you to do to stop embarrass yourself: go and read about bip16! it was in 2012 and every fucking body was perfectly happy with it.

Bump

Can someone elaborate on this

he is wrong tho scale is purely a technical problem. blocksize storeage and network propagation times don't scale very well. they allow for a natural growth with the underlying infrastructure (which btc blatantly missed to take advantage of) but it's not fucking enough long term for significant adoption figures.

btc could have doubled the block size with every halving and be fine. it was a fuckup of historical proportions not to do that. bch went full retard, but looking back seeing what sv does they start to look like the moderates in this clusterfuck.

Except that is the wrong naive approach. Each time you double the block size you increase the centralization factor of a crypto by two. You can't solve a problem with the same type of thinking used to create it

>1 node

idk what you are talking about NANO has already solved it