The last few larps have been saying "(you) guys weren't supposed to know about Chainlink" Wouldnt we just end up finding out about it regardless of Assblaster or riddle user? It seems all cryptos are poured over by autists and it would have worked its way on here anyways to face the crucible.
How much has biz actually affected chainlink and price?
yea its probably bullshit, but maybe we would not have known the extent of which different companies will be involved. overall yes people still would have bought link, i was all in before i really explored this place, and coming here just made me buy 4x as much.
Aiden Hall
>you guys weren’t supposed to know... Well, well, well looks like we’ve stumbled upon a gold mine >...that it’s going to be worth the price of a cup of coffee
Noah Richardson
>You guys weren't supposed to know about this >Top 50 in marketcap, valued at over one hundred and fifty MILLION dollars with no working product Yeah, you're all getting in on the ground floor user. Totally not getting scammed, well done.
I am afraid of a future where usage of chainlink and hence token ownership will be dominated by big corporates
Nicholas Diaz
You are supposed to know, they actually don't care. But they also don't care if you don't know. We are just along for the ride.
Nolan Clark
just like the world already is? nothing new, except LINK holders from here will be in the new 1% while the top stays the same. im alright with it.
William Robinson
im more worried about AI with link
Landon Parker
why? watch too many hollywood movies?
Xavier Lewis
not if you were lucky/smart enough to wait until it was in 115-120 rank.
Adam Kelly
are you trying to insult me so i can spoon feed you?
Jason Wood
LINK's javascript has been hacked and now all the nodes are being affected, meaning they will go offline one by one.
But here's the real trick; every node that goes offline first has to be validated by other nodes, Thus the first node won't go offline until EVERY SINGLE NODE has verified it actually has gone offline
LINK will be in an infinite javascript loop. Maybe if you're a programmer you will recognize FOR and WHILE loops. Well.. This is a FOR loop that NEVER ends.
The price will TANK to at least 50 satoshi Maybe even lower when the nodes are actually verified being offline.
Sergey is now busy setting up extra nodes to undo this process. Called contra-hacking. He has injected some GO-language code, pseudo-offline code, into the ChainLink network. This means nodes will appear the be online, while they are struggling to go offline, but in the meantime they cant because it isn't verified yet. Neat trick if you ask me, but it wont last long before the other nodes will know whats really going on. Get into something else now
I bought at 17 cents and sold at 63 cents. Current buy order is in at 22 cents based on TA. I'm a trader and businessman, not a bagholder like 99% of linkies on this board.
Cooper Allen
no. im being serious. there is no need to be afraid of AI, the world is perfectly terrible as it is, AI is probably not going to make anything worse. people will lose their jobs, so what? they should have bought 100 LINK the whole gawt damn year it was under 50 cents.
Hudson Cruz
you are incapable of critical thinking or a still trying to bait my thoughts out. If you cant imagine why ai would be bad with trust less data 24/7 then idk what to say to you
Julian Mitchell
This is user on mobile, hope it works out until it doesn't, its not worth the risk if you can just grind out a decent stack, believe you me, ive wanted to swing plenty of times, but that's literally gambling.
Juan Martin
>I'm a trader and businessman, stop playing pretend, pls
Colton Hernandez
Its not like they would ever release that before really testing it, it will be just finacial data at first. Theres just so much more to be gained from doing this right, are you sure you're not the one who struggles with critical thinking?
Chase Sanchez
fuck off timo
Blake Perry
>he hasn't looked at whats being tested on the testnet
ok you're smarter then me. You won the internet argument
Jaxon Rivera
ai's, especially superintelligent one like the supposed singularity will give birth to, won't have emotions dictate it's decisions.. meaning it won't 'hate' humans. but it might view their actions and survival mechanisms similar to a virus/cancer, it would also see the (((existential suffering))) we're faced with, and that eradicating us would be mercy, for us and the universe we're rapidly consuming for material pleasure
Aaron Clark
It is already public knowledge that not everything they are testing is on the pivotal tracker, also they will continue development beyond mainnet, surely this will all have a network effect. Try again.
Large corporations and elite families and so own the world. But with blockchain technology, it is even easier for them to control the world and people.
Kayden Cruz
where else are they testing?
Leo Adams
>thinking pivotal and the testnet are the same thing you know you look stupid right?
Ayden Rodriguez
As long as you understand where im getting at, i don't care how i look. Buy the tokens, don't buy them. I've already made my choice, i personally hope you hold none.
There won‘t be 1 AI that rules everyone but many different ones that get their orders from the top, all (((they))) have to do then to force a certain policy is just a few clicks to direct the AIs and they will do the rest.
Justin Davis
Argue about what? Ive already said what i wanted to say. What say you? You holding LINK or not faggot?
Jacob Lewis
Oh. You think i think highly of myself. Nigger. Just no. Im just here to get rich for me and my family. I don't care what the rest of you assholes do or think about me or LINK. Get rich or don't, it is literally that simple.
David Price
look all im saying is look at the actual test net where transactions are happening. Do what you want after that
Nathan Jenkins
Ragie discord tranny here. Don't give up and know my pronouns
if most of the network is in the hands of cloud providers then this whole thing is fucked and whatever AI that does get spawned will be controlled by those with the best data sets. Who do you think has the best data sets?
Dominic Reed
That's a sign of high IQ.. We should be. An AI controlled by (((them))) could control everything in your daily life through ITT and could use smart contracts to trigger real life consequences just by analyzing user data
John Williams
>If you cant imagine why ai would be bad with trust less data 24/7 then idk what to say to you Get a load of this guy, fuckin unbelievable. If an AI will reach the state where it's capable to fuck with trustless data you're fucked big times WAY BEFORE that and in a SHITTON OF DIFFERENT WAYS, period. >B-but muh linkies still Fuckin autismo, unironically
Owen Lopez
your effort to FUD ratio is way off
Joshua Flores
Federal prison for sergey and possibly other team members
Colton Jones
what do you mean? what exactly in testnet worries you?
>If an AI will reach the state where it's capable to fuck with trustless you're an actual retard. That wasnt the point.
Austin Lewis
>That wasnt the point. >Implying I should give a fuck And you're literally autistic indeed. What you'd define a sperg that worries about his matching outfit before leaving home during a fucking earthquake? Congrats, you're on the dictionary. Please note that the earthquake is an example, autismo.
David Campbell
god dam you're dumb haha. i didnt imply you should care. I didnt imply anything actually. You misunderstood my point and i corrected you. Now you're mad and making it about me being a sperg when i have an average iq. That say a lot about you.