CHECK THEIR WEBSITE
SWIFT IS INVOLVED? THEY FUCKING SAY THEY AREPARTNERS
for people who do not know; swift is LEADING company in bank transfers for more than 13000 (THIRTHEEN THOUSAND) banks and counting!
Fuck this im all fucking in holy fucking cancer
Other urls found in this thread:
smartcontract.com
en.wikipedia.org
forbes.com
businessdictionary.com
swift.com
twitter.com
I come here all the time and I've never seen this before.
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team
nice find op, been a long time since we had some real crumbs on here. it's awesome to know one day swift will be using my very own node to power their trillion dollar derivatives market.
Lol nice photoshop faggot
"work with" does not mean "partners" user
priced in
This is old, very old. Besides, you do realise that BSV will make SWIFT obsolete?
thank you serg
OP I eat at places LIKE "The Savoy and The Ritz". Mainly McD's.
partner1
NOUN
1Either of a pair of people engaged together in the same activity.
This is the correct reading.
Imagine wanting so desperately for your delusions of wealth to be true that you willfully read vague promotional material - in crypto no less - as absolute gospel. We're reaching delusional levels previously not thought possible.
lol. dude. in business "working with" and "partner" mean very different things.
This might not be priced in
>smartcontract.com
>We're proud to be working with SWIFT on their own SWIFT Smart Oracle
>on their own
OH NO NO NO
swift is the first breadcrumb there was
>in business "working with" and "partner" mean very different things
They really don't.
en.wikipedia.org
>A business partner can be:
>A supplier
>A customer
>A channel intermediary (such as an agent or reseller), or
>A vendor of complementary offerings (for example, one party sells the hardware, while the other sells the software)
You're just a retard who bought into the whole "muh partnership" schtick the Chinks started in crypto about two years ago.
lol how did what you quoted disprove what i said? talk about a non-sequitor
>Business relationships involve one participant seeking another to respond to and fill an immediate need. Partnerships, on the other hand, involve long-term commitments where each participant contributes to the success of the other. Business relationships can be moved from a zero-sum game to one where both entities strive for mutually beneficial long-term success.
chainlink and swift have a business relationship. sergey has "worked with" swift in the past to fill a need they had. there was no long-term commitment
oh, i understand. you think just because that page said a business partner CAN be one of those things, that that means everyone you work with that is one of those things, is your partner.
idiot.
>lol how did what you quoted disprove what i said?
Yes.
Even tenuous relationships like those I listed are often called partnerships.
>you think just because that page said a business partner CAN be one of those things, that that means everyone you work with that is one of those things, is your partner.
In a way, yes.
Only difference would be if the parties involved explicitly call each other "partner" or not. Which is entirely inconsequential.
I use swift to pay for big tittie anime porn.
They are my partner now.
>Only difference would be if the parties involved explicitly call each other "partner" or not. Which is entirely inconsequential.
strange. why does forbes disagree with you?
>strange. why does forbes disagree with you?
Forbes doesn't decide this.
In a general sense, "business partner" can mean a million things.
>business partner
>Definition
>An individual or company who has some degree of involvement with another entity's business dealings. The term 'business partner' can have a wide range of meanings (...) The term is also frequently used for two businesses that cooperate, to any degree
businessdictionary.com
we are talking about partnerships. not colloquialisms.
That doesn't make any sense.
You're babbling because of cognitive dissonance.
How new are you?
what is babbling?
Ffs sold 50k link the other day. I believed the fud and my own investigations showed me it’s a Cayman Islands scam by a fat Russian con artist and his American twink bf. But SWIFT? God fucking damn it. Had I know of that I’d have hodld on.
>hodld on.
kys for unironically saying hodl
I am partner with swift too, I sent a payment the other day using a swift code
You salty bro?
i hate this place
ya I can't wait for swift to use the hamburglar's erc-20 token network. honk honk
What coin do you sell?
the link ico was successful because they lied about swift partnerships. That alone should let you know that sergey is a liar and any claim of future working decentralized oracles are also lies. He's just biding his time before exit scamming
How did they lie?
HOW "NEW" ARE YOU?
i've been reading this shit for 2 years. What the fuck am i doing with my life.
they paid shill sites like coin telegraph to mention them and swift in the same article, when they had 0 relationship, which in turn created the Jow Forums link meme because bizralies are too stupid to know that news sites are paid and genuinely thought that link was working with swift. Link is all marketing, they spent tons on PR and cross promotion fake partnerships. People here are too dumb to recognize this as marketing and think it's real.
This retarded image reminds me of Powerpoint slides I put together at work to make my projects look good by glossing over details and playing up fake strengths. The only difference is I only have my salary on the line when I do it but Sergey has millions on the table. This is pure propaganda from a company without a product
>to mention them and swift in the same article, when they had 0 relationship
But Chainlink did a PoC for Swift. This was announced in 2016, developed for a year, and presented at Sibos 2017.
Chainlink was the absolute only (external) crypto company to present at that year's Sibos.
It's the definition of retardation that i still check in here after nearly 2 years of the bogs and this shit EVERY FUCKING DAY!!!
no, they never did anything for Swift, if you actually research there is not a single mention of Chainlink on any swift website. Sibos is not swift, it's some shitty convention that makes money by allowing people to PAY to present their products. Anyone can present there as long as they pay. Couldn't be further from working with swift.
>no, they never did anything for Swift
But they did.
you do realise this is a propaganda text to lure investers right? Created by chainlink. Presented at a possible invester crowd.
show proof from an actual swift owned website that they ever worked with link. I can create a swift compliant application on my own, then pay to present it at sibos (not swift), it doesn't mean i ever talked to anyone at swift. See, sergey is an expert at fooling brainlets like yourself to believing they worked with swift, when in fact, they did not.
Is 15,000 enough to make it? Asking for a friend.
Sibos is arguably THE largest international financial event in the world.
Are you saying Chainlink paid them off for a spot on the roster?
>show proof from an actual swift owned website that they ever worked with link
I just did.
Here's the link, since you're too lazy to google: swift.com
Basically digibyte mk2 by the sounds of it..
No, i'm saying chainlink can say whatever they want and make it plausible. It's called plausible deniability.
they didn't work with swift and they'll never will. Literally i'm typing this out for 2 years now. Can't believe you guys still haven't figured it out honestly
>No, i'm saying chainlink can say whatever they want and make it plausible. It's called plausible deniability.
But it's Swift saying it.
>they didn't work with swift and they'll never will
Except Swift says they did.
swift.com
he sure did pay them. Like I said, this is not proof, I too can create a complaint swift app on my basement, then pay to present at sibos and be featured on this crappy pdf. Did I ever talk to anyone at swift? No. Exactly what chainlink did.
I told you to show me a proof that they worked with swift, from a swift source. What you showed is a proof that they created a swift compliant app. I too can do that, it does not require a partnership of any kind.
I can create an app that is compliant with any company protocol or api, google, amazon, stripe, you name it. Then I can present this app at a convention. In no way does this represent any relationship between me and them.
>ctrl+f "chainlink"
>0 results
They looked in to the winner. They won't be using your ERC token of choice kid. Seriously. Think about it. They don't have a product in 2019. They sure didn't in 2017. The time of that brochure.
Swift system works perfect now, they're not going to use your shitty token friend. I'm really fucking done talking about this shit. Believe what you want, honestly sick and tired of this useless shitcoin.
>I told you to show me a proof that they worked with swift, from a swift source.
And I posted exactly that.
>What you showed is a proof that they created a swift compliant app.
No, I posted a link to Swift's own main website showing that smartcontract/chainlink developed a PoC for Swift.
This is so hilarious.
So you admit that they did work with Swift? Contrary to what you were trying to claim?
Pic related was one of the slides shown by Sergey at Sibos 2017.
>>I told you to show me a proof that they worked with swift, from a swift source.
>And I posted exactly that.
your IQ is sub 100. I can create a Swift compliant app in my basement alone in 1 hour. It does not me I have a working relationship with Swift.
Also, I can buy a big mac at mc donalds, it does not mean i have a working relationship with mcdonalds. Sibos makes money from people paying them to present. If you present, you are a customer, (like me at mc donalds), not a partner.
But to be honest your IQ is so low, there's no way you can understand what I just wrote.
Yeah, they might have talked. BUT SWIFT WILL NEVER USE YOUR SHITCOIN. IT'S A MULTI BILLION DOLLAR COMPANY WHICH ISN'T GOING TO USE A FUCKING ERC SHITTOKEN FROM A RUSSIAN FILOSOFER WHO CAN'T EVEN MAKE A FUCKING PAMFLET.
Is your brain literally to small for this?
99 fucking % of erc tokens are money grabs.
Yet you think your fucking cherry picked shittoken which can't deliver shit, is going to be used all over the fucking world.
ARE YOU FUCKING RETARDED?
Honestly. Now. Never fucking reply to me again. Literally filtering every fucking chainlink thread. You guys are fucking dumb.
Not even joking. Can't you think for 2 minutes?
>I can create a Swift compliant app in my basement alone in 1 hour.
And can you score a presentation at Sibos, and get mentioned on Swift's main website?
>shown by Sergey
so... not from swift?
>Yeah
Thank you for conceding.
yes, sergey made this to make low IQ people like yourself think they have a relationship with Swift. I can guarantee you Sergey has never had any contact with anyone at swift, and the only contact he has at sibos is the sales associate that charged him ~30k to let him present his shitty product.
Israel has no right to exist.
Fucking link faggots still discussing 2017 shit. IT WAS NOTHING
You've been lied too. Yet these fucking retards are so smug to fucking think they are right.
>checks price.
dumped another 10%
>EOY 0.33$
>i would be surprised if it isn't 3$ by may 2018
Honestly fucking gas yourself fucking retards. You've been wrong 1453 times. Literally and yet you're still smug defending a fucking 5 lines of text written in 2017
I hope you hang yourself all
>And can you score a presentation at Sibos
You don't score a presentation at Sibos, you pay for it.
agreed
Honestly if i see someone with a fucking link t-shirt i'll fucking punch him in the face.
What?
>think they have a relationship with Swift
>I can guarantee you Sergey has never had any contact with anyone at swift
He developed and presented a PoC for them.
>You don't score a presentation at Sibos, you pay for it.
lmao, someone's jealous.
You sound upset.
still not a single proof of swift mentioning chainlink ever
the fake url you gave has 0 mentions of chainlink. the charade is up buddy, only a sub 40 IQ tard would fall for that at this point
>still not a single proof of swift mentioning chainlink ever
>0 mentions of chainlink
See
That's still not Swift mentioning Chainlink... haha wtf are you broken?
>a presentation by sergey
man, you really are dumb. Sergey mentioning swift is not the same as SWIFT mentioning chainlink
JUST POST PROOF ALREADY
I'm fucking raging.
You literally have been wrong for 2 years. 2 years straight, everything about link has been false.
And you are fucking smug defending a 5 sentences piece of text from 2017.
I can't grasp how deluded you are. Seriously. You can't even admit you have been wrong for all this years.
Yet you have to come smear this smug shit in my face every fucking day, every fucking day the same threads. Every fucking day new lies.
OOOOOOH but 130000 banks will use chainlink.
no you fucking retard, no one will use chainlink. Even if they deliver. News flash, nobody uses crypto after 10 years.
Nobody will use your shitty fucking fuck moneygrab token.
>He developed and presented a PoC for them.
No, he did not do it for them. At least they were never aware that he did it for them, because they never had any contact with him.
Nobody reading this conversation will agree with you, your arguments are completely retarded.
jfc what the fuck is going on here
Oh boy, look at those goalposts fly.
The discussion was about whether Sergey did work for Swift, not whether Swift literally mentioned Chainlink.
>No, he did not do it for them. At least they were never aware that he did it for them, because they never had any contact with him.
Except he developed and presented a PoC for them.
Source: swift.com
/r the copypasta about "I wake up at 6am, I need no alarm" and paying whores .0003 REQ or something
that is a source that he did a PoC on his own, using swift technology publicly available to anyone. It is not a source that he did it for them. He did not do it for them. He did it for himself, by himself. Then paid to present it at sibos.
>Sergey did work for Swift
WHERE IS THE PROOF?? THE LINK YOU POSTED DOESN'T MENTION SERGEY OR CHAINLINK OR ANYTHING. YOU HAVE 0 PROOF
Rolling
Do you not know what smartcontract.com is?
please put all your money in this. Sell everything you have. Do it.
it says they made a presentation. where does it say they worked for swift?
fyi Rory has said they've maintained the relationship outlined on the website.
That user is sweating rn lmao
so no relationship lol
They developed the PoC for Swift.
>They developed the PoC for Swift.
I also developed a PoC for swift. They never saw it, cause I have no relationship with them, neither does chainlink.
did swift ask them to? no. a bunch of companies won some random contest one of them smartcontracts and as part of their reward they got invited to make a presentation. swift never asked them to do anything
I only jumped in at the tail end of the discussion to point out that a poster made by Chainlink mentioning Swift, is not Swift Mentioning Chainlink, which I still haven't seen proof of
Where in that Blockchain Sibos 2017 pdf I downloaded, does it mention Chainlink???
I developed an app for Swift. Swift is completely unaware I did. They don't care about it. They won't use it. We have no working relationship. But I still developed it FOR Swift.
>I also developed a PoC for swift
>I developed an app for Swift
Did you also get to present at Sibos?
>did swift ask them to?
Of course.
They even paid them 100k for it.
>They even paid them 100k for it.
proof?
>Did you also get to present at Sibos?
No because I don't have 30k to pay them to present there. But I sure could if I did.
>30k
>to present at the biggest financial event in the world
You sure are cute, user.
You're probably thinking of being an exhibitor at Sibos, that's open to anyone.
Not presentations though.
Google it.
Not him, but here you go faggot.
It's actually fucking amazing how perfectly Link orchestrate their scam to fool low IQ investors.
They created an app using publicly available swift APIs making people think they're actually working with them, then pay to present it at a convention organized by Swift, to further reinforce this false fact.
Truly masterful scam.
Nigger, this has been old news for a long time now.
It was a good whitepaper.
That's it. Clever whitepaper/marketing. Enjoy your bags